DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Short Form of the Korean Version- the Boston Naming Test (K-BNT-15) Based on Item Response Theory

문항반응이론을 적용한 한국판 보스톤 이름대기 검사 단축형(K-BNT-15) 개발

  • 김향희 (연세대학교 언어병리학 협동과정/연세대학교 의과대학 재활의학교실) ;
  • 김수련 (연세대학교 언어병리학 협동과정)
  • Received : 2013.08.19
  • Accepted : 2013.11.26
  • Published : 2013.12.28

Abstract

Impaired naming difficulty is common in normal elderly as well as in patients with neurological impairment. The 60-item Korean version-Boston Naming Test(K-BNT) is one of the most commonly used test for measuring confrontational naming ability. However, age-related cognitive decline may make the elderly difficult concentrating during the 60-item test, therefore, item reduction of the K-BNT would improve test validity and reliability. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop a short form of the K-BNT based on Item Response Theory(IRT). Considering item-fit index, sex factor, and item difficulty through Rasch analysis, the 15-item K-BNT(i.e., K-BNT-15) was developed. Via administration of the K-BNT-15, we observed age-related decline in naming ability and significantly different performance between the normal elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment. This study demonstrates the utility of IRT for developing a short-form language evaluation tool. The K-BNT-15 can be effective as a language screening tool to differentiate between normal aging and pathological diseases.

Keywords

Item Response Theory;Rasch analysis;Korean version-Boston Naming Test;Item Reduction

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. O. Pedraza, B. C. Sachs, T. J. Ferman, B. K. Rush, and J. A. Lucas, "Difficulty and discrimination parameters of Boston Naming Test Items in a consecutive clinical series," Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol.26, No.5, pp.434-444, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr042
  2. R. F. Zec, S. Markwell, N. R. Burkett, and G. Pyo, "Effects of age, education and gender on the Boston Naming Test in a large elderly normative sample," Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol.18, No.7, pp.697-697, 2003.
  3. L. Gordon and N. Kindred, "Word retrieval in ageing: An exploration of the task constraint hypothesis," Aphasiology, Vol.25, No.6, pp.774-788, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.539699
  4. M. Albert, H. S. Heller, and W. Milberg, "Changes in naming ability with age," Psychology and aging, Vol.3, No.2, pp.173-178, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.3.2.173
  5. H. Tsang and T. M. C. Lee, "The effect of ageing on confrontation naming ability," Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol.18, No.1, pp.81-89, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/18.1.81
  6. C. Papagno and E. Capitani, "Slowly progressive aphasia: A four-year follow-up study," Neuropsychologia, Vol.39, pp.678-686, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00007-0
  7. K. King, M. Hough, P. Vos, M. Walker, and G. Givens, "Word retrieval following mild TBI: Implications for categorical deficits," Aphasiology, Vol.20, No.2, pp.233-245, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500473155
  8. C. Papagno and S. Muggia, "Naming people ignoring semantics in a patient with left frontal damage," Cortex, Vol.35, pp.537-548, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70817-7
  9. A. E. Lansing, R. J. Ivnik, C. M. Cullum, and C. Randolph, "An empirically derived short form of the Boston naming test," Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol.14, No.6, pp.481-487, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/14.6.481
  10. J. Saxton, G. Ratchliff, C. A. Munro, C. E. Coffey, J. T. Becker, L. Fried, and L. Kuller, "Normative data on the Boston Naming Test and two equivalent 30-item short forms," The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol.14, pp.526-534, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.14.4.526.7204
  11. W. J. Mack, D. M. Freed, B. W. Williams, and V. W. Henderson, "Boston Naming Test: Shortened versions for use in Alzheimer's disease," Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, Vol.47, pp.154-158, 1992.
  12. G. T. Smith, D. M. McCarthy, and K. G. Anderson, "On the sins of short-form development," Psychological Assessment, Vol.12, pp.102-111, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
  13. R. E. Graves, S. C. Bezeau, J. Fogarty, and R. Blair, "Boston Naming Test short form: A comparison of previous forms with new Item Response Theory based forms," Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol.26, No.7, pp.891-902, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490510716
  14. B. Thompson, "Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: A guidelines editorial," Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.55, pp.525-534, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055004001
  15. 김향희, 나덕렬, 한국판 보스톤 이름대기 검사 (K-BNT), 서울: 학지사, 1997.
  16. 강연욱, 김향희, 나덕렬, "치매진단을 위한 단축형 Korean-Boston Naming Test(S-K-BNT)의 개발", 한국심리학회지: 임상, 제18권, 제2호, pp.125-138, 1999.
  17. W. Hula, N. J. Donovan, D. L. Kendall, and L. J. Gonzalez-Rothi, "Item response theory analysis of the Western Aphasia Battery," Aphasiology, Vol.24, No.11, pp.1326-1341, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903422502
  18. G. Rasch, Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. [Original work published in 1960].
  19. C. M. Del Toro, L. P. Bislick, M. Come시, C. Velozo, S. Romero, L. J. G. Rothi, and D. L. Kendall, "Development of a short form of the Boston Naming Test for individuals with aphasia," Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol.54, pp.1089-1100, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0119)
  20. 지은림, 채선희, Rasch모형의 이론과 실제, 파주시: 교육과학사, 2000.
  21. 강연욱. "K-MMSE의 노인 규준 연구", 한국심리학회지(일반), 제25권, 제2호, pp.1-12, 2006.
  22. J. M. Linacre, WINSTEPS version 3.68.2., 2009.
  23. 채선희, 지은림, 백순근, 설현수, 문항반응이론의 이론과 실제, 고양시: 도서출판 서현사, 2003.
  24. R. C. Peterson, R. Doody, A. Kurz, R. C. Morris, P. V. Rabins, K. Ritchie, M. Rossor, L. Thal, and B. Winblad, "Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment, Vol.58, No.12, pp.1985-1992, 2001.
  25. R. C. Peterson, "Mild Cognitive Impairment as a diagnostic entity," Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol.265, No.3, pp.183-194, 2004.
  26. T. G. Bond and C. M. Fox, Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human science (2nd ed.), NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher London, 2007.
  27. 김성해, 박재현, "항암화학요법을 받는 암환자 간호핵심역량 측정도구 개발 및 타당화", 대한간호학회지, 제42권, 제5호, pp.632-643, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.5.632

Cited by

  1. Characteristics of Confrontation Naming Ability according to Word Frequency in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Preliminary Study vol.22, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17391
  2. Comparison of Error Types and Qualitative Analysis of Correct Responses in a Confrontation Naming Test for Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment vol.22, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17421
  3. Diagnostic Value of Time-Constrained Naming Test in Mild Cognitive Impairment vol.44, pp.3-4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1159/000479149
  4. A Validation Study of Korean Version of Personality Beliefs Questionnaire-Short Form (PBQ-SF) vol.55, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2016.55.2.103
  5. Global Coherence Analysis of Discourse in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Associated Cognitive Function vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18561