An Analysis of the Differences in Research-related Constructs: Serial Comparson of the Graduate Students in Global Ph. D Fellowship and Brain Korea 21 Projects

대학원생들의 연구관련 성과 변인들의 차이 분석: 글로벌 박사양성 프로젝트와 두뇌한국21사업을 중심으로

  • Received : 2013.03.24
  • Accepted : 2013.05.16
  • Published : 2013.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the key research-related constructs, research insterest, research self-efficacy, research productivity, and research outcome expectation of the graduate students, who are participating in Global Ph.D Fellowship (GPF) and Brain Korea (BK) 21 projects. The overall results show that the mean scores of GPF students in research interest, research self-efficacy, research productivity, and research outcome expectation are higher than those of BK21. However, the higher mean scores of doctoral students in both GPF and BK21 projects imply that the longer you stay in graduate program, the better researcher you can be. Although GPF program selected higher potential students and they seem to work very hard with high expectation to be competent researchers, compatible outcome also could be possible by BK21 project.

Keywords

research interest;research self-efficacy;research productivity;research outcome expectation;graduate students;Global Ph.D Fellowship (GPF);Brain Korea (BK) 21

References

  1. 교육과학기술부(2011). Global Ph.D Fellowship 추진계획(안). 교과부 발표자료.
  2. 김병주(2006). BK21사업 재정지원의 상대적 효율성 분석. 교육재정경제연구, 15(2): 221-245.
  3. 김병주 ․ 최손환 ․ 서지영(2005). 두뇌한국21(BK21) 사업에 대한 학생 만족도 분석. 23(4): 321-342.
  4. 백일우 ․ 박경호(2007). 1단계 BK21 사업이 대학의 연구성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 교육행정학연구, 25(4): 435-453.
  5. 김세균(1999). 두뇌한국21(BK21) 사업의 문제점. 사회비평, 21: 140-150.
  6. 나승일 ․ 박희철 ․ 김연정 ․ 장규선 ․ 장현진 ․ 이은경(2009). 산업교육 분야 전공 대학원생의 연구역량 형성과정. 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 41(3): 87-121.
  7. 박경호 ․ 백일우(2008). 패널자료를 이용한 BK21 사업과 대학의 연구성과분석을 위한 새로운 접근방식의 모색, 교육행정학연구, 26(3): 233-249.
  8. 정우진 ․ 김경연 ․ 조보경 ․ 이영미(2008). 제2단계 BK21사업에 대한 학생들의 만족도조사: 인문 ․ 사회계열을 중심으로. 한국교육학연구, 14(2): 155-279.
  9. 이영(2012). 대학교qor육체제의 현황과 문제. 지식의 지편, 12: 40-55.
  10. 한국연구재단(2013). BK21 ․ WCU 후속사업 계획(안) 공청회 자료. 한국연구재단(2013.3.22일).
  11. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop R. M., & Garcia. V. L.(1996). The utility of the research self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4: 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400104
  12. Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J.(1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(2): 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.2.182
  13. Jones, L. N.(2006). The role of faculty and peer research mentoring in research productivity, self-efficacy, and satisfaction of doctoral students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City.
  14. Kahn, J. H., & Scott, N. A.(1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25: 38-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097251005
  15. Vaccaro, N.(2009). The relationship between research selfefficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research in counselor education doctoral student and ex-post-facto, cross-sectional correlational investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida.
  16. 미국 연방과학재단, http://www.nsf.gov/funding.
  17. 일본 과학진흥처, http://www.jsps.go.jp.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 상명대학교