DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Training Requirements for Control Room Operators of an Advanced Nuclear Power Plant

Park, Hong Joon;Park, Geun Ok;Kim, Sa Kil;Byun, Seong Nam

  • 투고 : 2013.01.21
  • 심사 : 2013.01.25
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28

초록

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the training requirements of new nuclear power plant by a comprehensive literature review. Background: The design of instrumental and control systems for New NPP is applied fully digitalized systems. For example, soft-control, large display panels(LDP), and an advanced alarm system were applied to the APR-1400 or SMART. Method: The NUREG-0711 and international guideline of training program was analyzed from the following four phases of SAT(Systemic Approach to Training): Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation. Results: To identify the requirement of training program, 'Feedback' phase was considered and each phase of SAT was classified. Conclusion: A more systematic requirement of training program is needed which considers the computerized system was applied to the new NPP. Application: The results of the publishing can be useful for standardization of the systematic training program for the operators of NPP.

키워드

Training program;Systemic Approach to Training(SAT);SAT requirements;Human errors

참고문헌

  1. Annett, J. & Duncan, K., Task analysis and training in design, Occupational Psychology, 41, 1967.
  2. ANSI/ANS-3.1, Selection, qualification, and training of personnel for nuclear power plants, 1993.
  3. ANSI/ANS-3.5, Nuclear power plants simulator for use in operating training and examination, 1994.
  4. Bailey, R.W., Human Performance Engineering: Using human factors/ ergonomics to achieve computer system usability, 2nd edition Prentice-Hall International Edition, 1989.
  5. IAEA-TECDOC 995, Selection, specification, design and use of various nuclear, 1998.
  6. INPO, Control Room Teamwork Development Training: Course Administration and Facilitation Guide, National Academy for Nuclear Training, Atlanta, GA, 1993.
  7. INPO, Human Performance Tools for Workers (INPO 06-002), 2006.
  8. Kim, S.K. et al., "Crew Resource Management Training for Improving Team Performance of Operators in Korea Advanced Nuclear Power Plant", Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 2055-2059), Hong Kong, 2009.
  9. Kirkpatrick, D.L., Evaluation training programs: The four levels, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler, 1994.
  10. Lee, D.H. et al., Short-Term Human Factors Engineering Measures for Minimizing Human Error in Nuclear Power Facilities, ESK Journal, 26(4), 121-125, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2007.26.4.121
  11. Roth, E. and O'Hara, J., Integrating digital and conventional HSIs: Lessons learned from a control room modernization program, BNL letter Report J6012-T3-4-5/98, Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1998.
  12. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C. & Jenkins, D.P., Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design, Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2005.
  13. U.S.NRC, 10CFR50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities, 1998.
  14. U.S.NRC, 10CFR52, Licensing, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants, 2007.
  15. U.S.NRC, 10CFR55, Operator's Licenses, 2007.
  16. U.S.NRC, NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, 2007.
  17. U.S.NRC, NUREG-0711, Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model, 2004.
  18. Zohar, D., A, group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on micro accidents in manufacturing jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587-596, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Research Foundation of Korea