DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Potential Effects of Climate Change on Streamflow in Rivers Basin of Korea Using Rainfall Elasticity

Kim, Byung Sik;Hong, Seung Jin;Lee, Hyun Dong

  • Received : 2012.03.06
  • Accepted : 2013.01.16
  • Published : 2013.03.30

Abstract

In this paper, the rainfall elasticity of streamflow was estimated to quantify the effects of climate change on 5 river basins. Rainfall elasticity denotes the sensitivity of annual streamflow for the variations of potential annual rainfall. This is a simple, useful method that evaluates how the balance of a water cycle on river basins changes due to long-term climate change and offers information to manage water resources and environment systems. The elasticity method was first used by Schaake in 1990 and is commonly used in the United States and Australia. A semi-distributed hydrological model (SLURP, semi-distributed land use-based runoff processes) was used to simulate the variations of area streamflow, and potential evapotranspiration. A nonparametric method was then used to estimate the rainfall elasticity on five river basins of Korea. In addition, the A2 (SRES IPCC AR4, Special Report on Emission Scenarios IPCC Fourth Assessment Report) climate change scenario and stochastic downscaling technique were used to create a high-resolution weather change scenario in river basins, and the effects of climate change on the rainfall elasticity of each basin were then analyzed.

Keywords

Climate change;Nonparametric estimation;Rainfall elasticity

References

  1. Schaake JC. From climate to flow. In: Waggoner PE, ed. Climate change and U.S. water resources. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1990. p. 177-206.
  2. Chiew FH, McMahon TA. Modelling the impacts of climate change on Australian streamflow. Hydrol. Process. 2002;16:1235-1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1059
  3. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS; the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
  4. Xu CY. Climate change and hydrologic models: a review of existing gaps and recent research developments. Water Resour. Manag. 1999;13:369-382. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008190900459
  5. Nash LL, Gleick PH. Sensitivity of streamflow in the Colorado basin to climatic changes. J. Hydrol. 1991;125:221-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90030-L
  6. Revelle RR, Waggoner PE. Effects of a carbon dioxide-induced climatic change on water supplies in the western United States. In: Changing climate: report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee. Washington: National Academy Press; 1983.
  7. Vogel RM, Wilson I, Daly C. Regional regression models of annual streamflow for the United States. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 1999;125:148-157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1999)125:3(148)
  8. Sankarasubramanian A, Vogel RM, Limbrunner JF. Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States. Water Resour. Res. 2001;37:1771-1781. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900330
  9. Fu G, Charles SP, Chiew FH. A two-parameter climate elasticity of streamflow index to assess climate change effects on annual streamflow. Water Resour. Res. 2007;43:W11419.
  10. Niemann JD, Eltahir EA. Sensitivity of regional hydrology to climate changes, with application to the Illinois River basin. Water Resour. Res. 2005;41:W07014.
  11. Sankarasubramanian A, Vogel RM. Hydroclimatology of the continental United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003;30:1363. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015937
  12. Block PJ, Souza Filho FA, Sun L, Kwon HH. A streamflow forecasting framework using multiple climate and hydrological models. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2009;45:828-843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00327.x
  13. Hamlet A, Snover A, Mote P, Salathe E, Lettenmaier D. Climate change streamflow senarios for water planning sutides [Internet]. Seattle: Climate Impacts Group; c2012 [cited 2013 Feb 28]. Available from: http://cses.washington.edu/cig/res/ hwr/ccscenarioplanning.shtml.
  14. Wood AW, Maurer EP, Kumar A, Lettenmaier DP. Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2002;107:4429. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000659
  15. Kite G. Application of a land class hydrological model to climate change. Water Resour. Res. 1993;29:2377-2384. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00582
  16. Kim BS, Kim BK, Kwon HH. Assessment of the impact of climate change on the flow regime of the Han River basin using indicators of hydrologic alteration. Hydrol. Process. 2011;25:691-704. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7856
  17. Kwon HH, Kim BS. Development of statistical downscaling model using nonstationary Markov chain. J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. 2009;42:213-225. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.3.213
  18. Kim BS, Kim HS, Seoh BH, Kim NW. Impact of climate change on water resources in Yongdam Dam basin, Korea. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2007;21:355-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0070-5
  19. Kite G. Manual for the SLURP hydrological model, ver. 12.7. Colombo: International Water Management Institute; 2007.
  20. Rosenblatt M. Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function. Ann. Math. Stat. 1956;27:832-835. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728190

Cited by

  1. Environmental Engineering Research in March 2013 pp.2005-968X, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2013.18.1.001
  2. Sensitivity assessment of the impacts of climate change on streamflow using climate elasticity in Tigris River Basin, Iraq pp.1029-0400, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018.1494924