DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Transcriptomic Analysis of Genes Modulated by Cyclo($\small{L}$-Phenylalanine-$\small{L}$-Proline) in Vibrio vulnificus

  • Kim, In Hwang (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University) ;
  • Son, Jee-Soo (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University) ;
  • Wen, Yancheng (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University) ;
  • Jeong, Sang-Min (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University) ;
  • Min, Ga-Young (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University) ;
  • Park, Na-Young (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University) ;
  • Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Joon (Chunlab, Inc., Seoul National University) ;
  • Chun, Jongsik (Chunlab, Inc., Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Kun-Soo (Department of Life Science and Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University)
  • Received : 2013.08.23
  • Accepted : 2013.10.02
  • Published : 2013.12.28

Abstract

Diketopiperazine is produced by various organisms, including bacteria, fungi, and animals, and has been suggested as a novel signal molecule involved in the modulation of genes with various biological functions. Vibrio vulnificus, which causes septicemia in humans, produces cyclo($\small{L}$-phenylalanine-$\small{L}$-proline) (cFP). To understand the biological roles of cFP, the effect of the compound on the expression of the total mRNA in V. vulnificus was assessed by next-generation sequencing. Based on the transcriptomic analysis, we classified the cFP-regulated genes into functional categories and clustered them according to the expression patterns resulted from treatment with cFP. From a total of 4,673 genes, excepting the genes encoding tRNA in V. vulnificus, 356 genes were up-regulated and 602 genes were down-regulated with an RPKM (reads per kilobase per million) value above 3. The genes most highly induced by cFP comprised those associated with the transport and metabolism of inorganic molecules, particularly iron. The genes negatively regulated by cFP included those associated with energy production and conversion, as well as carbohydrate metabolism. Noticeably, numerous genes related with biofilm formation were modulated by cFP. We demonstrated that cFP interferes significantly with the biofilm formation of V. vulnificus.

Introduction

Diketopiperazines (DKPs, or cyclic dipeptide molecules) are produced by various organisms, including bacteria, sponges, algae, and animals [22]. These molecules have attracted a great deal of attention owing to recent findings showing that members of this molecular family have various physiological effects, including antimicrobial [13,18] and antitumor activities [8,17], the promotion of plant growth [11], signaling for quorum sensing [14], and modulation of the expression of virulence factors [3,37]. Nevertheless, the biochemical or molecular biological bases for the actions of these molecules have yet to be elucidated.

Vibrio vulnificus is a Gram-negative, halophilic bacterium, and an opportunistic pathogen causing septicemia in humans who are immunocompromised or have underlying conditions [9]. This pathogen produces cyclo(L-phenylalanine-L-proline) (cFP), which activates a quorum-sensing bioindicator [20]. The production of cFP from V. vulnificus reaches the highest level when cell growth enters the stationary phase. Purified cFP from culture supernatant or chemically synthesized cFP enhances the expression of ompU encoding a porin in V. vulnificus [37]. This molecule has also been identified in V. cholerae, and affects the expression of the virulence factor, cholera toxin [3,37]. cFP was also identified in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. putida, and the compound activates several quorum-sensing bioindicators [12,20]. Based on these findings, cFP has been suggested as a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule [27,37].

cFP has also been reported to have additional activities. This molecule exhibits antibacterial and antifungal activities [33,41,45], and inhibits DNA topoisomerase [40]. The compound also inhibits cancer cell growth and induces apoptosis in colon cancer cells [4,5]. More recently, it has been shown that cFP produced by the human vaginal Lactobacillus strain represses the production of toxic shock syndrome toxin in Staphylococcus aureus by quenching the quorum-sensing signal [30], and that cFP produced by plant-associated bacteria mimics auxin activity, promoting plants growth [36]. Although the promiscuous biological activities of cFP are being reported, the mode of action of the compound at the molecular level remains to be investigated.

In order to obtain basic information to understand the physiological roles and working mode of cFP in V. vulnificus, we investigated and compared the transcriptomes of the pathogen grown in the presence or absence of exogenous cFP using the RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) technique. Here, we report that numerous genes are modulated by cFP and suggest possible biological roles of cFP based on this analysis.

 

Materials and Methods

Strain and Growth Conditions

The pathogenic V. vulnificus strain MO6-24/O [38] was employed for this study. V. vulnificus MO6-24/O was grown aerobically in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Neogen, Baltimore, MD, USA) at 30℃. To examine the effect of cFP, V. vulnificus MO6-24/O cells were prepared as follows: V. vulnificus MO6-24/O was streaked onto a solid LB plate, and on the next day, the cells from the solid medium were inoculated in LB broth. The cells were cultured overnight, and then subcultured in the same medium. The cFP stock (Bachem, Switzerland) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and u sed at a f inal concentration of 5 mM for the cFPtreated group. For the non-cFP-treated group, the same volume of DMSO was added to the medium. Cells in both the cFP-treated and cFP-non-treated media were further cultured at 30℃ until the stationary phase (OD600 of ~1.5) and then used for RNA extraction.

RNA Extraction, Sequencing, and Data Analysis

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy midi kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Contaminated DNA was eliminated by RNase-free DNase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the quantity and quality of the total RNA were evaluated using RNA electropherograms (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer) and assessing the RNA integrity number (RIN) [43]. Ten micrograms of the total RNA from each sample over a RIN value of 8.0 was used as a starting material and treated with the MICROBExpress mRNA enrichment kit (Invitrogen). The resulting mRNA samples were processed for the sequencing libraries using the Illumina mRNA-Seq sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following themanufacturer’s protocols.

One lane per sample was used for sequencing by the Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx (Illumina) to generate non-directional, single-ended 36-base-pair reads. Quality-filtered reads were mapped to the reference genome sequences (NCBI BioProject ID PRJNA62243) using CLC Genomics Workbench 5.5 (CLC bio, Denmark). The relative transcript abundance was computed by counting the reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped sequence reads (RPKM) [35]. The Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) database was used to cluster the genes into functionally related groups [47].

Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The primers for quantitative real-time PCR are listed in Table 1. Total RNA was extracted as described above and cDNA was synthesized using a Prime Script RT reagent kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s directions. Real-time PCR was carried out using the LightCycler 480 system with SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche Applied Sciences, Basel, Switzerland). Relative gene expression was quantified using the 2-ΔΔCT method.

Quantitative Assessment of Biofilm Formation

Biofilm formation assay was performed as described previously [26]. In brief, overnight culture of V. vulnificus in LB medium was subcultured to fresh AB broth with 1% sodium fumarate as a carbon source after washing. When the cell density reached a value of A600 0.5–1.0, the culture was washed twice with ABfumarate broth, and then subcultured to the adjusting value of A600 0.05 in AB-fumarate broth containing various concentrations of cFP (0–5 mM) in a borosilicate bottle. After 48 h of incubation, the biofilm of the wall was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and then stained with 1.0% crystal violet for 30 min. The stained biofilm was washed twice with distilled water and air dried, and then resuspended in 100% ethanol. The amount of crystal violet in the stained biofilm was quantified by the value of A550, and normalized by dividing the planktonic cell density (A600).

 

Results and Discussion

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of Total mRNA

The concentration of cFP detected in the culture supernatant of wild-type V. vulnificus is approximately 0.7~1 mM [37]. We have observed that phenotypes associated with cFP are observed at 1 mM, but the phenotypes are more clearly manifested at 5 mM. For previous studies [3,30,36], cFP at the concentration of even higher than 10 mM was used. Therefore, we added 5 mM of cFP for cFP-treated cells to obtain clear results in this study.

Through the NGS technique, a total of 27,716,116 sequence reads were obtained from the control cFP-non-treated and cFP-treated samples. From these, we mapped 1.4 million (12%) and 2.1 million (13%) mRNA reads from total RNA. Most of the remaining reads were from rRNA. A total of 4,562 genes other than the genes encoding tRNA were assigned to the COG classification [47], and were classified into 17 groups. These suggest that cFP affects the expression of numerous genes with various functions. Major COGs to which genes modulated by exogenous cFP belong are those for cellular processes, signaling, carbohydrate transport, metabolism, and energy production and conversion (Fig. 1).

Table 1.aThe order of these genes is as shown in Fig. 2. bUsed as a negative control for qRT-PCR.

The expressions of a total of 958 genes, including those with unknown functions with size ranging from 100 to 3,000 bp, were affected by exogenous cFP by at least 3-fold. This number of genes corresponds to 47.5% of the RefSeq protein-coding genes in the genome of V. vulnificus MO6- 24/O. A total of 356 genes were positively regulated and the rest of genes were negatively regulated by cFP (Supplementary data in Tables S1 and S2). These results showed that cFP affects the regulation of a vast number of genes in the V. vulnificus genome.

Genes Up-Regulated by cFP

Thirty-one genes were up-regulated by cFP with an RPKM value higher than 100, excluding those annotated as “hypothetical protein” and these are summarized in Table 2. Among these, 17 genes belong to the group of inorganic ion transport and metabolism among the COG categories (Table 2). Of these genes, 15 genes are related with iron, specifically heme utilization, iron acquisition, and the regulation of these genes. It is noteworthy that two groups of genes (VVM06_01206~01212 and VVM06_04197~04211), which were closely mapped in the chromosome, were highly induced by cFP. The former gene sets are responsible for the assembly of pilus, whereas the latter are responsible for vulnibactin biosynthesis. Flp pilus mediates adhesion to surfaces and is essential for colonization and pathogenesis [42]. This type of pilus has not yet been studied in V. vulnificus. It is possible that, induced by cFP, this type of pilus contributes to the pathogenicity of V. vulnificus.

Fig. 1.The COG grouping of putative proteins encoded by genes modulated by cFP. Each bar represents the number of genes belonging to the different functional categories. All proteins were assigned to the COG database and classified functionally into 17 molecular families. C: Energy production and conversion; D: Cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning; E: Amino acid transport and metabolism; F: Nucleotide transport and metabolism; G: Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; H: Coenzyme transport and metabolism; I: Lipid transport and metabolism; J: Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; K: Transcription; L: Replication, recombination, and repair; M: Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; O: Post translational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; P: Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; T: Signal transduction mechanisms; U: Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; and V: Defense mechanism.

Vulnibactin is a siderophore responsible for the uptake of extracellular iron in V. vulnificus [44]. This protein is important for the virulence of V. vulnificus. We recently showed that the expression of vulnibactin is coordinately regulated by iron and the quorum-sensing pathway [48]. In an iron-rich condition, genes for vulnibactin are repressed by the Fur-iron complex. However, in an iron-depleted condition, those genes are induced only in low cell density. It is possible that cFP may exert a regulatory effect on vulnibactin expression via Fur-dependent or quorumsensing regulatory pathways. Alternatively, there may be another regulatory pathway associated with the cFP-dependent regulation of these genes. The biological significance of the induction of iron-related genes by cFP has not yet been elucidated. If cFP plays a role as a quorum-sensing signal, then it supports the expression of iron-related genes at a high cell density where intracellular iron is scarce in the host environment. Future studies on cFP function need to focus on its relationship with iron metabolism and related regulatory mechanisms.

Genes Down-Regulated by cFP

In contrast to genes up-regulated by cFP, many of the genes down-regulated by cFP are for glycolysis, anaerobic energy metabolism, and fermentation (Table 3). The expression of some of these genes (alcohol dehydrogenase, pyruvate formate lyase) promotes biofilm formation in bacteria [15,19]. The expression of the gene encoding tryptophanase is also significantly repressed by cFP. Tryptophanase is an enzyme that hydrolyzes tryptophan into pyruvate, ammonia, and indole. Indole plays various physiological roles in bacteria [21]. It is noteworthy that biofilm formation is among those roles. In Escherichia coli, indole controls biofilm formation by repressing motility and inducing the sensor protein for a quorum-sensing signal [21,28]. These results suggest that cFP may inhibit biofilm formation by repressing the genes associated with biofilm.

Two groups of genes, each of which is closely mapped in the chromosome, are highly repressed by cFP; one group comprises the genes for nitrate reductase (VVM06_01962~01967), and the other forms an operon responsible for sialic acid biosynthesis (VVM06_04101~04107). Downregulation of the former genes may allow cells to adapt to an oxygen limitation in the host, providing favorable circumstances for pathogens to survive in the host intestine [49]. The latter genes are associated with the acquisition, transport, and biosynthesis of sialic acid from the host’s intestinal environment in V. vulnificus [1,31,23]. Sialic acid, which is rich in the epithelial surfaces of the intestine, is a good carbon and energy source for infecting pathogenic bacteria; hence, sialic acid is important for the pathogenesis of enteropathogens, including V. vulnificus [25]. In accordance with this study, these gene sets are only present in clinical isolates, and not in environmental isolates [34]. Recently, it was shown that the regulator NanR represses the expression of these genes in carbon-rich conditions [23]. cFP may play a role in the fine control of these genes to facilitate the survival and pathogenicity of the pathogen in sialic-acidrich conditions in the host intestine, in accordance with the cell density of the pathogen. Taken together, these results suggest that cFP controls the expression of genes crucial for the adaptation and pathogenicity of V. vulnificus in host environments.

Table 2.aGenes with RPKM values over 100 except for those annotated “hypothetical protein” are listed in the order of their GenBank accession numbers. Shadowed genes denote those closely mapped in the chromosome. bFold calculated as quotients of RPKM values (cFP-treated / cFP-untreated).

Regulatory Genes Whose Expression Was Affected by cFP

Numerous genes possibly involved in the regulatory functions are modulated by cFP. Among these, several genes putatively encoding diguanylate cyclases that synthesize c-di-GMP have been identified (Table 4). Noticeably, one putative diguanylate cyclase (VVMO6_01151) is the most highly repressed. Diguanylate cyclase contributes to biofilm formation, as previously reported [10, 24]. As mentioned above, numerous genes possibly involved in biofilm formation are down-regulated by cFP. It is possible that the diguanylate cyclase may be related with the down-regulation of those genes. However, 10 other putative diguanylate cyclases are positively regulated by cFP, with RPKM values above 3. In the V. vulnificus genome, there exist more than 40 genes possibly encoding diguanylate cyclases (data not shown). However, none of these genes’ roles have been systematically studied. Among these genes, VVMO6_01151 would be the best candidate for future functional study in connection with cFP and biofilm.

Table 3.aGenes with RPKM value below 30 except for those annotated “hypothetical protein” are listed in the order of their GenBank accession numbers. Shadowed genes denote those closely mapped in the chromosome. bFold calculated as quotients of RPKM values (cFP-treated vs. cFP-untreated).

Table 4.aFold calculated as quotients of RPKM values (cFP-treated/cFP-untreated); +, fold induction level; -, fold repression level. For induced genes, genes with RPKM values over 3.0 are shown, whereas for repressed genes, genes with RPKM values below -2.6 are given in this table.

The iron-sulfur cluster regulator (IscR) is positively regulated by cFP. It is responsible for the regulation of genes for the [Fe-S] protein [16], and has an unusual characteristic in that both apo- and iron-sulfur-bound holoforms regulate transcription with different DNAbinding specificities and affinities [39]. In V. vulnificus, this regulator appears to form an operon with six structural genes, specifically VVMO6_02434~02439 (encoding cysteine desulfurase IscS, iron-sulfur cluster assembly scaffold protein IscU, iron-binding protein IscA for iron-sulfur cluster assembly, chaperone protein HscB, and chaperone protein HscA, respectively). All of these genes are positively regulated by cFP (Supplementary data S1). It is likely that the cFP induction of these genes is mediated by IscR. As mentioned above, cFP induces numerous genes associated with iron (Table 2). In this context, the regulation of IscR by cFP would provide invaluable information on the relationship between iron and its metabolism.

Several regulators related with sigma-B and anti- and anti-anti-sigma functions are also positively regulated by cFP. The biological meaning of this result remains to be elucidated. It is noteworthy that a LeuO homolog (VVMO6_02645) is also positively regulated by cFP. We recently found that this regulator, once induced by cFP, induces the expression of a series of genes with pathogenic roles (unpublished results). We assume that this LeuO homolog is a major regulator for a cFP-dependent signal pathway(s), and we are currently studying the biological roles of this regulator.

cFP also affects the expression of vpsR, which encodes the positive transcriptional regulator required for the expression of Vibrio polysaccharides (vps) genes [2]. The action of VpsR is epistatic to that of the quorum-sensing master regulator HapR in V. cholerae. VpsR affects pathogenic phenotypes of V. cholerae, such as biofilm formation. cFP modulates the expression of sensor kinase vieS and response regulator vieA, which contributes to motility and biofilm formation by adjusting the cyclic diguanylate level [32]. The VieSAB three-component signal transduction system is also closely involved in cholera toxin production [46]. These findings imply that a complex regulatory interplay among cFP, VieS, VpsR, and other functions control the genes responsible for biofilm and virulence factor production in V. vulnificus.

The expression of ToxRS is also regulated by cFP. These membrane proteins have been well studied as sensor proteins responsible for the expression of virulence factors in V. cholerae [7]. In V. vulnificus, a mutation in toxR decreases the production of the virulence factor vvhA encoding a hemolysin [29]. These membrane proteins appear to be responsible for a cFP-mediated signal transduction [37]. The induction of the expression of ompU by cFP is dependent on ToxRS. In a mutant lacking in ToxR function, cFP-dependent induction of ompU is abolished. The relationships among cFP, toxRS, ompU, and vvhA still need to be investigated. The gene luxS, responsible for the biosynthesis of quorum-sensing autoinducer-2 signal molecule (AI-2), is also repressed by cFP. In well-studied V. vulnificus strains, such as YJ016 and MO6-24/O, whose genome sequences have been completely determined [6,38], the effort to identify a homoserine lactone signal molecule (AI-1) compound or a gene responsible for AI-1 biosynthesis has been unsuccessful. Therefore, AI-2 appears to be a major quorum-sensing signal in this pathogen. If cFP represses the expression of luxS, it suggests that cFP antagonizes the AI-2-dependent quorumsensing signal circuit. The production of cFP in Vibrio spp. is also enhanced at the early stationary phase, as is AI-2 production [3,37]. It is possible that cFP affects not only its cognate signaling pathway, but also the AI-2-dependent quorum-sensing pathway, which interplay with each other to modulate sets of genes in accordance with complex environmental conditions, including cell density.

Fig. 2.Comparisons of expression levels of representative genes from V. vulnificus MO6/24-O grown in the presence or absence of exogenous cFP. Transcriptional levels of selected genes from Tables 2 to 4 in cells grown in the absence or presence of cFP were compared by quantitative RT-PCR. (A) Genes positively regulated by cFP. (B) Genes negatively regulated by cFP. RNA levels were quantified using the comparative threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method, and RNA fold change was normalized to the value for the expression level of the gene encoding NADPH-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a control. The data are the average values from three independent samples; error bars denote standard deviation.

Fig. 3.Effect of cFP on biofilm formation of V. vulnificus. The biofilm formation was quantitatively measured as described in Materials and Methods. The data are the average values from three independent samples; error bars denote standard deviation.

Confirmation Using qRT-PCR

To validate the reliability of the RNA-Seq results, 12 genes (six up-regulated by cFP and six down-regulated by cFP) were subjected to quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). These selected genes were chosen because they are of special interest in our research and are currently under investigation for their roles in connection with cFP. Even though the values of the relative ratios of transcription levels between the cFP-treated group and non-cFP-treated group are overall much smaller in qRT-PCR than those observed in RNA-seq, the results of qRT-PCR coincide well with those of RNA-Seq (Fig. 2). This suggests that the RNA-seq results are biologically significant.

cFP Inhibits Biofilm Formation in V. vulnificus

As mentioned above, numerous genes related with biofilm formation are modulated by cFP. Recently, several DKPs have been shown to be capable of removing the biofilm architecture [13]. However, the effect of cFP on biofilm formation has not been studied. We assessed the effect of cFP on the biofilm formation of V. vulnificus using the crystal violet staining method. As shown in Fig. 3, the formation of biofilm of V. vulnificus was reduced when treated with cFP. Even 1 mM of cFP reduced biofilm formation more than 30%, and 5 mM of cFP was responsible for up to a 55% reduction. These results showed that cFP inhibits the biofilm formation of V. vulnificus. The molecular genetic basis of the effect of cFP on biofilm formation still needs to be elucidated.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References

  1. Almagro-Moreno S, Boyd FF. 2009. Insights into the evolution of sialic acid catabolism among bacteria. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-118
  2. Beyhan S, Bilecen K, Salama SR, Casper-Lindley C, Yildiz FH. 2007. Regulation of rugosity and biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae: comparison o f VpsT and VpsR regu lons and epistasis analysis of vpsT, vpsR, and hapR. J. Bacteriol. 189: 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00981-06
  3. Bina XR, Bina JE. 2010. The cyclic dipeptide cyclo(Phe-Pro) inhibits cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus production in O1 El Tor Vibrio cholera. J. Bacteriol. 192: 3829-3832. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00191-10
  4. Brauns SC, Dealtry G, Milne P, Naude R, Van de Venter M. 2005. Caspase-3 activation and induction of PARP cleavage by cyclic dipeptide cyclo(Phe-Pro) in HT-29 cells. Anticancer Res. 25: 4197-4202.
  5. Brauns SC, Milne P, Naude R, Van de Venter M. 2004. Selected cyclic dipeptides inhibit cancer cell growth and induce apoptosis in HT-29 colon cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 24: 1713-1719.
  6. Chen CY, Wu KM, Chang YC, Chang CH, Tsai HC, Liao TL, et al. 2003. Comparative genome analysis of Vibrio vulnificus, a marine pathogen. Genome Res. 13: 2577-2587. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1295503
  7. Childers BM, Klose KE. 2007. Regulation of virulence in Vibrio cholera: the ToxR regulon. Future Microbiol. 2: 335-344. https://doi.org/10.2217/17460913.2.3.335
  8. Chu M, Truumees I, Rothofsky ML, Patel MG, Gentile F, Das PR, et al. 1995. Inhibition of c-fos proto-oncogene induction by Sch 52900 and Sch 52901, novel diketopiperazine produced by Gliocladium sp. J. Antibiot. 48: 1440-1445. https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.48.1440
  9. Chiang SR, Chuang YC. 2003. Vibrio vulnificus infection: clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, and antimicrobial therapy. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 36: 81-88.
  10. Cotter PA, Stibitz S. 2007. c-di-GMP-mediated regulation of virulence and biofilm formation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10: 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2006.12.006
  11. Cronan JM, Davidson TR, Singleton FL, Colwell RR, Cardellina JH. 1998. Plant growth promoters isolated from a marine bacterium associated with Palythoa sp. Nat. Prod. Lett. 11: 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10575639808044959
  12. Degrassi G, Aguilar C, Bosco M, Zahariev S, Pongor S, Venturi V. 2002. Plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas putida WCS358 produces and secretes four cyclic dipeptides: crosstalk with quorum sensing bacterial sensors. Curr. Microbiol. 45: 250-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-002-3704-y
  13. de Carvalho MP, Abraham WR. 2012. Antimicrobial and biofilm inhibiting diketopiperazines. Curr. Med. Chem. 19: 3564-3577. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712801323243
  14. de Kievit TR, Iglewski BH. 2000. Bacterial quorum sensing in pathogenic relationships. Infect. Immun. 68: 4839-4849. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.9.4839-4849.2000
  15. Finelli A, Gallant CV, Jarvi K, Burrows LL. 2003. Use of inbiofilm expression technology to identify genes involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J. Bacteriol. 185: 2700-2710. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.9.2700-2710.2003
  16. Giel JL, Nesbit AD, Mettert EL, Fleischhacker AS, Wanta BT, Kiele PJ. 2013. Regulation of iron-sulfur cluster homeostasis through transcriptional control of the Isc pathway by [2Fe- 2S]-IscR in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 87: 478-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12052
  17. Graz CJ, Grant GD, Brauns SC, Hunt A, Jamie H, Milne PJ. 2000. Cyclic dipeptides in the induction of maturation for cancer therapy. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 52: 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1211/0022357001773535
  18. Graz M, H u nt A , Jamie H, G rant G , Milne P. 1 999. Antimicrobial activity of selected cyclic dipeptides. Pharmazie 54: 772-775.
  19. Gualdi L, Tagliabue L, Landini P. 2007. Biofilm formationgene expression relay system in Escherichia coli: modulation of sigmaS-dependent gene expression by the CsgD regulatory protein via sigmaS protein stabilization. J. Bacteriol. 189: 8034-8043. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00900-07
  20. Holden MT, Chhabra SR, de Nys R, Stead P, Bainton NJ, Hill PJ, et al. 1999. Quorum-sensing cross talk: isolation and chemical characterization of cyclic dipeptides from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 33: 1254-1266.
  21. Hu M, Zhang C, Mu Y, Shen Q, Feng Y. 2010. Indole affects biofilm formation in bacteria. Indian J. Microbiol. 50: 362-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0142-1
  22. Huang R, Zhou X, Xu T, Yang X, Liu Y. 2010. Diketopiperazines from marine organisms. Chem. Biodivers. 7: 2809-2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200900211
  23. Hwang J , Kim BS, Jang SY, L im JG, You DJ, Jung HS, et al. 2013. Structural insights into the regulation of sialic acid catabolism by the Vibrio vulnificus transcriptional repressor NanR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: E2829-E2837. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302859110
  24. Jenal U, Malone J. 2006. Mechanisms of cyclic-di-GMP signaling in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40: 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090423
  25. Kim BS, Hwang J, Kim MH, Choi SH. 2011. Cooperative regulation of the Vibrio vulnificus nan gene cluster by NanR protein, cAMP receptor protein, and N-acetylmannosamine 6-phosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 25: 40889-40899.
  26. Kim HS, Park SJ, Lee KH. 2009. Role of NtrC-regulated exopolysaccharides in the biofilm formation and pathogenic interaction of Vibrio vulnificus. Mol. Microbiol. 74: 436-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06875.x
  27. Klose KE. 2006. Increased chatter: cyclic dipeptides as molecules of chemical communication in Vibrio spp. J. Bacteriol. 188: 2025-2026. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.188.6.2025-2026.2006
  28. Lee JT, Jayaraman A, Wood TK. 2007. Indole is an interspecies biofilm signal mediated by SdiA. BMC Microbiol. 7: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-42
  29. Lee SE, Shin SH, Kim SY, Kim YR, Shin DH, Chung SS, et al. 2000. Vibrio vulnificus has the transmembrane transcription activator ToxRS stimulating the expression of the hemolysin gene vvhA. J. Bacteriol. 182: 3405-3415. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.12.3405-3415.2000
  30. Li J, Wang W, Xu SX, Magarvey NA, McCormick JK. 2011. Lactobacillus reuteri-produced cyclic dipeptides quench agrmediated expression of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 in staphylococci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 3360-3365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1017431108
  31. Lubin JB, Kingston JJ, Chowdhury N, Boyd FF. 2012. Sialic acid catabolism and transport gene clusters are lineage specific in Vibrio vulnificus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 3407-3415. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07395-11
  32. Martinez-Wilson HF, Tamayo R, Tischler AD, Lazinski DW, Camilli A. 2008. The Vibrio cholerae hybrid sensor kinase VieS contributes to motility and biofilm regulation by altering the cyclic diguanylate level. J. Bacteriol. 190: 6439-6447. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00541-08
  33. Milne P J, Hu nt A L, R ostoll K, V an der W alt JJ, Graz CJ. 1998. The biological activity of selected cyclic dipeptides. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 50: 1331-1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb03355.x
  34. Morrison SS, Williams T, Cain A, Froelich B, Taylor C, Baker-Austin C, et al. 2012. Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of Vibrio vulnificus environmental isolates. PLoS One 7: e37553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037553
  35. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. 2008. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 5: 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1226
  36. Ortiz-Castro R, Díaz-Perez C, Martínez-Trujillo M, del Río RE, Campos-García J, López-Bucio J. 2011. Transkingdom signaling based on bacterial cyclodipeptides with auxin activity in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 7253-7258. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006740108
  37. Park DK, Lee KE, Baek CH, Kim IH, Kwon JH, Lee WK, et al. 2006. Cyclo(Phe-Pro) modulates the expression of ompU in Vibrio spp. J. Bacteriol. 188: 2214-2221. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.188.6.2214-2221.2006
  38. Park JH, Cho YJ, Chun J, Seok YJ, Lee JK, Kim KS, et al. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Vibrio vulnificus MO6- 24/O. J. Bacteriol. 193: 2062-2063. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00110-11
  39. Rajagopalan S, Teter SJ, Zwart PH, Brennan RG, Phillips KJ, Kiley PJ. 2013. Studies of IscR reveal a unique mechanism for metal-dependent regulation of DNA binding specificity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20: 740-747. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2568
  40. Rhee KH. 2002. Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I by cyclo(L-prolyl-L-phenylalanyl) isolated from Streptomyces sp. AMLK-335. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 12: 1013-1016.
  41. Rhee KH. 2004. Cyclic dipeptides exhibit synergistic, broad spectrum antimicrobial effects and have anti-mutagenic properties. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 24: 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.05.005
  42. Roux N, Spagnolo J, de Bentzmann S. 2012. Neglected but amazingly diverse type IVb pili. Res. Microbiol. 163: 659-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2012.10.015
  43. Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, Salowsky R, Leiber M, Gassmann M, et al. 2006. The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol. Biol. 7: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-3
  44. Simpson LM, Oliver JD. 1983. Siderophore production by Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 41: 644-649.
  45. Strom K, Sjogren J, Broberg A, Schnurer J. 2002. Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo(L-Phe-L-Pro) and cyclo(L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3- phenyllactic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 4322-4327. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.9.4322-4327.2002
  46. Tischler AD, Lee SH, Camilli A. 2002. The Vibrio cholerae vieSAB locus encodes a pathway contributing to cholera toxin production. J. Bacteriol. 184: 4104-4113. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.15.4104-4113.2002
  47. Tutusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacob AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, et al. 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-41
  48. Wen YC, Kim IH, Son JS, Lee BH, Kim KS. 2012. Iron and quorum sensing coordinately regulate the expression of vulnibactin biosynthesis in Vibrio vulnificus. J. Biol. Chem. 287: 27727-26739.
  49. Xu Q, Dziejman M, Mekalanos JJ. 2003. Determination of the transcriptome of Vibrio cholerae during intraintestinal growth and midexponential phase in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1286-1291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337479100