A Study on the Standard Model of Entrepreneurship Index

우리나라 기업가정신 모델 수립에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2013.06.30


Many institutes such as Bank of Korea, Samsung Economic Research Institute and Chamber of Commerce announced Entrepreneurship Index models. But, due to the arbitrary measurement model and the survey of each institute, there is a misled in the understanding and model of entrepreneurship. In addition, there is no research about comparative study of Entrepreneurship Index until now. In this study, we suggest our own Entrepreneurship Index model based on the literature review of Entrepreneurship Index. This model enables the objective measurement of Entrepreneurship Index. Above all, we suggest advantages and disadvantages of existing Entrepreneurship Index model systematically and the direction of Entrepreneurship Index.

그간 우리나라에서는 한국은행, 삼성경제연구소, 대한상의 등에서 기업가정신 측정모델을 발표한 바 있으나, 각 기관의 임의적인 측정모델 개발 및 단편적인 조사로 인해, 우리나라 기업가정신 측정 및 이해에 혼선이 초래되었다. 아울러, 기업가정신지수에 대한 국내외 비교연구의 부재로 글로벌 기업가정신지수 모델 수립이 현실적으로 어려웠다. 이에 본 연구에서는 무엇보다 기존 기업가정신 지수 관련 국내외 연구에 대한 선행연구분석과 이를 기초로 한 기업가정신 지수 모델, 즉, 기업가정신의 객관적 측정과 국제적 비교를 가능하게 하는 공통지표를 제시했다. 무엇보다 기존 연구 내용 및 장단점을 체계적으로 정리, 향후 기업가정신 지수의 방향성을 제안했다.



  1. 김원규, 성장잠재력 확충과 기업가정신, e-KIET 산업경제정보 제341호, 산업연구원, 2007.
  2. 반성식 외, 글로벌기업가정신연구 2007 보고서, 국립진주산업대학교, 2008.
  3. 반성식 외, 글로벌기업가정신연구 2008 보고서, 국립진주산업대학교, 2009.
  4. 반성식 외, 글로벌기업가정신연구 2009 보고서, 국립진주산업대학교. 2010.
  5. 반성식 외, 글로벌기업가정신연구 2010 보고서, 경남과학기술대학교. 2011.
  6. 양현봉 외, 기업가정신의 발현실태와 함양방안, e-KIET 산업경제정보 제420호, 산업연구원, 2008.
  7. W. Cho and M. Song, "Selecting Information Technology Projects in Non-linear Risk/Return Relationships of IT Investment," Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, Vol. 9. No. 1, pp. 21-31, 2012.
  8. Y. Hahm, S. Lee, H. Kang, and J. Kim, "Business Model Components and Challenges in Korean IT Companies: A Comparative Case Study," Journal of Information Technology and Architecture Vol. 9. No. 1, pp. 95-110, 2012.
  9. S. Park and W. Lee, "Task Assignment and Assessment based on Hierarchical Knowledge Structure as a Reference Model," Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, Vol. 8. No. 4, December 2011, Pages 395-401
  10. Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, and D. S. Evans, "Why does the self-employment rate vary across countries and overtime?" CEPR Discussion Papers 871, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers, 1994.
  11. Acs, Z. J. and L. Szerb,. "The Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEINDEX)," Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 341-435, 2009.
  12. Ahmad, Nadim, and Anders N. Hoffman, A framework for addressing and measuring entrepreneurship, OECD statistics directorate, working paper, 2008/2, OECD publishing, 2008.
  13. Audretsch, D., Innovation and industry evolution, MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
  14. Audretsch, D. B. and R. Thurik, Linking entrepreneurship to growth, STI working paper 2001/2 Paris: OECD, 2001.
  15. Audretsch, D. B., Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature, Prepared for the European Commission, Enterprise Directorate General, 2002.
  16. Avanzini, Diego B., Designing composite entrepreneurship indicators- An application using consensus PCA, United Nations University, 2009.
  17. Avanzini, Diego B., Composite Entrepreneurship Indicators: theoretical derivation and general methodology, unpublished manuscript, Catholic University of Chile, 2008.
  18. Blanchflower, D. G., Self-employment in OECD countries, Labor economics, Vol. 7, pp. 471-505, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00011-7
  19. Blanchflower, D. G., A. Oswald, and A. Stutzer, Latent entrepreneurship across nations, European economic review, Vol. 45, pp. 680-691, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00137-4
  20. Bruce, D. and D. Holtz-Eakin, Who are the entrepreneurs? Evidence from taxpayer data, Journal of entrepreneurial finance and business ventures, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-10, 2001.
  21. Caree, M, A. van Stel, R. Thurik, and S. Wennekers, Economic development and business ownership, EIM business and policy research, Mimeo, 2000.
  22. DEACA, 2009 Entrepreneurship Index - Entrepreneurship condition in Denmark, Danish Enterprise and construction authority, 2009.
  23. Earle, J. S. and Z. Sakova, Business start-up or disguised unemployment? Evidence on the character of self-employment from transition economics. Labor Economics, Vol. 7, pp. 575-601, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00014-2
  24. Evans, D. S. and L. S. Leighton, Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship, American economic review, Vol. 79, pp. 519-535, 1989.
  25. Fairlie, Robert W., Kauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity 1996-2009, Kauffman Foundation, 2010.
  26. Fonseca, R., P. Lopez-Garcia, and C. A. Pissarides, Entrepreneurship, start-up costs and employment, European economic review Vol. 45, pp. 692-705, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00131-3
  27. FORA, InnovationMonitor 2006 - Denmark's Innovation Capacity - From Benchmarking to Policy, FORA, 2006a.
  28. FORA, Quality assessment of entrepreneurship indicators version 2, International Consortium for dynamic benchmarking of entrepreneurship, The national agency for enterprise and construction's division for research and analysis, FORA, 2006b.
  29. Garrett, Thomas A. and Howard J. Wall, Creating a policy environment for entrepreneurs, Cato Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 525-552, 2006.
  30. Georgellis, Y. and H. J. Wall, Entrepreneurship and policy environment, Federal reserve bank of St. Louis working paper 2002-019A, 2002.
  31. Georgellis, Yannis and Howard J. Wall, Entrepreneurship and the policy environment, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, March/April, Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 95-111, 2006.
  32. Godin, K., J. Clemens and N. Veldhuis, Measuring entrepreneurship conceptual frameworks and empirical indicators, Studies in entrepreneurship markets 7, June Fraser Institute, 2008.
  33. Hamilton, B. H., Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment, Journal of political economy, Vol. 108, No. 3, 604-631, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1086/262131
  34. Kreft, Steven F. and Russell S. Sobel, Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom, Cato Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 595-614, 2005.
  35. OECD, Fostering Entrepreneurship. Paris, 1998.
  36. OECD, Labor Force Statistics, 1979-1999. Paris, 2000.
  37. OECD, Measuring Entrepreneurship, A collection of indicators 2009 edition, OECD-Eurostat Entrepreneurship Indicators Programme, OECD Statistics Directorate, 2009.
  38. OECD, OECD Factbook 2010: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, OECD Publishing, 2010.
  39. Saisana, Michaela and Stefano Tarantola, State-ofart report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development, EUR 20408 EN, European Commission-JRC; Italy, 2002.
  40. Salgado-Banda, Hector, Entrepreneurship and economic growth: An empirical analysis, Journal of developmental entrepreneurship, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 3-29, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946707000538
  41. Van Stel, A., COMPENDIA: Harmonizing business ownership data across countries and over time, International entrepreneurship and management Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 105-123, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-6678-y
  42. Wennekers, Sander, Andre van Stel, Martin Caree and Roy Thurik, The relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development: Is It UShaped?, Foundation and trends in entrepreneurship, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 167-237, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000023