Daytime and Night-time Noise Exposure Assessment for Soldiers at a Military Rifle Range

군대 소총사격장에서 군인들의 주야간 소음노출평가

Hwang, Sung Ho;Park, Jae Bum

  • Received : 2013.04.10
  • Accepted : 2013.08.07
  • Published : 2013.08.31


Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate exposure levels to K2 rifle noise at a military rifle range among soldiers in training, the left and right ears of shooters, and control managers in the day and night times. Methods: For this study, we visited military rifle ranges and measured the noise of a K2 rifle with a sound level meter (3M Quest SoundPro$^{TM}$) at four different locations with values of Peak (dB(A)) and Max (dB(A)). Results: The highest peak value of impulse noise level averaged 150.4 dB(A), ranging from 149.7 to 150.5 dB(A) at the left-ear side. Impulse noise levels in the daytime were also recorded as higher than during the night. This result was significantly different between daytime and nighttime locations, such as soldier training, right ear of shooter, and control manager (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study confirmed that there is a need for proper management of impulse noise at military rifle ranges.


Military;noise exposure;impulse noise;daytime;nighttime


  1. Henselman LW, Henderson D, Shadoan J, Subramaniam M, Saunders S, Ohlin D. Effects of noise exposure, race, and years of service on hearing in U.S. Army soldiers. Ear Hear. 1995; 16(4): 382-391
  2. Savolainen S, Lehtomaki KM. Impulse noise and acute acoustic trauma in Finnish conscripts. Number of shots fired and safe distances. Scandi Audiol. 1997; 26(2): 122-126.
  3. Pillips YY, Zajtchuk JT. Blast injuries of the ear in military operation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1989; 140: 3-4.
  4. Temmel AF, Kierner AC, Steurer M, Riedl S, Innitzer J. Hearing loss and tinnitus in acute acoustic trauma. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1999; 111(21): 891-893.
  5. Labarere J, Lemardeley P, Vincey P, Desjeux G, Pascal B. Acute acoustic trauma in military personnel evaluation of one year epidemiologic surveillance. Press Medi. 2000; 29(24): 1341-1344.
  6. Czerw RJ. Army Hearing Program. United States:Department of the Arm Press; 2008. p.2-44.
  7. Kim JS. A study on subjective noise evaluation of residential area on aircraft noise near airport: case study on Teagu airport. Korean Soc Noise Vib Eng. 2000; 10(1): 41-48.
  8. Kang DJ, Kim JM, Park JC. Road traffic noise status and prediction. Kor Soc Noise Vib Eng. 2004; 14(10): 1015-1020.
  9. Ahn MS, Kim JD, Hwang SJ. A case study to minimize effect of blasting vibration and noise on animal casualties. Kor Soc Noise Vib Eng. 2001; 11(1): 104-110.
  10. Keim RJ. Impulse Noise and Neurosensory Hearing Loss-Relationship to Small Arms Fire. Calif Med. 1970; 113(3): 16-19.
  11. Federal Register. Occupational Noise Exposure: Hearing Conservation Amendment. United States: Occupational Safety and Health Administration press; 1981. p.1-48.
  12. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, 7 th ed. United States: ACGIH Press; 2012. p.118-120.
  13. Henshaw JL. Hearing conservation program, United State: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Press; 2010. p.8.
  14. Ministry of Employment and Labor. Threshold limit values of Chemical and physical substances, South Korea; Ministry of Employment and Labor press; 2010. p.81-82.


Supported by : 국방부