Discussion about the approach to Police Identity

경찰 정체성 접근론에 관한 논의

  • 박한호 (원광대학교 경찰행정학과) ;
  • 김성환 (동국대학교 경찰행정학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.05
  • Accepted : 2013.08.06
  • Published : 2013.09.28


It is the fact that Korean police has not focused on establishing identity but focused on establishing system due to the war under the confused situation which accepted police system of continental law in the period of Japanese Colony and then accepted the police system when being governed by USA. Afterward, as political, economic, and social atmospheres outside became stable, police identity, the philosophy of police activity through internal introspection in order to orient police activity in modern society, is needed. However, most of approaches for establishing police identity have focused on phased measurement by emphasizing to find major variables. Such identity of police organization through certain measurement study could not only carry out replication but also showed its limit to internalize ideal identity. Therefore, this study analyzed the reflectivity of police activity according to how it depends on certain means and depending means as a recognition to internalize the identity in order to discuss the formation of necessity and approach in establishing police identity, and suggested its results.


Police Identity;Approach;Depending Means;Police Activity;Police Philosophy;Police System


  1. 박한호, 여성경찰공무원 직무개선에 관한 연구, 박사학위논문 원광대학교 대학원, pp.1-3, 2013.
  2. D. W. Perez, Paradoxes of Police Work, DELMAR CENGAGE Learning, pp.159-175, 2001.
  3. 한상암, 박한호, 경찰 정체성확립방안, 경찰청 미래발전과, 경찰청, pp.76-77, 2011.
  4. C. R. Swanson, L. Territo, and R. Taylor, Police Administration : Structures. Processes. and Behavior, Prentice-Hall, p.390, 2007.
  5. 오석홍, 인사행정론 제5판, 서울: 박영사, 2005, pp.21-102
  6. 한상암, 김명대, "경찰조직 정체성의 인식에 관한 연구", 한국경찰학회보, 제14권, 제1호, p.182, 2012.
  7. S. S. Souryal, Police Organization and Administration, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp.11-12, 1981.
  8. E. H. Erickson, Identity: Youthandcrisis, Norton, p.211, 1968.
  9. 송은미, 공군기술부사관 집단정체성척도 개발, 박사학위논문, 경북대학교대학원, p.9, 2011.
  10. H. J. Skolnick, Justice Without Trial. National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence, Ballantine Books, 1969.
  11. 남궁근, 행정조사방법론 제4판, 서울: 법문사, p.15, 2010.
  12. 이황우, 비교경찰제도론, 서울: 법문사, 1997, pp.3-37.
  14. 조지형, 역사의 진실을 찾아서 랑케 & 카, 서울: 김영사, pp.34-50, 2007.
  15. J. L. Sullivan, Introduction to Police Science, Mcgraw-Hill Book Co., pp.1-2, 1997.
  16. 조철옥, 경찰학개론, 대영문화사, pp.51-57, 2007.
  17. 박한호, 한상암, "경찰공무원 치안서비스제공의 일관된 행태 저해 요인에 관한 논의", 공안행정학회보, 통권47(21권2호), pp.341-365 2012.
  18. D. K. Henderson, Interpretation and Explanation in the Human Sciences, State University of New York Press, pp.14-34, 1993.
  19. 마리아나 발메르데, 법치란 무엇인가, 행성:B온다, pp.48-50, 2011.
  20. P. Winch, The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, p.121, 1958.
  22. 이황우, 경찰학개론 제4판, 서울: 법문사, 2005, p.478
  23. 배정훈, 동기부여론, 서울: 형설출판사, 2006, p.16
  24. Kast. F. E.. and Rosenzweig. J. E., Organization and management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill: 1985, p.286
  25. 김태곤, "경찰문화가 여성경찰관의 역할인식에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 동국대학교 대학원, pp.1-7, 2009.
  26. 류채형, "한국 여성경찰관의 직업정체성과 직무 태도와의 관계에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 동국대학교 대학원, pp.1-42, 2010.