DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predicted Optimum Efficiency due to Changes in the Design Parameters of the Small Electrostatic Precipitator

설계인자 변화에 따른 소형 전기집진장치의 최적효율 예측

Suh, Jeong-Min;Yi, Pyong-In;Jung, Moon-Sub;Park, Jeong-Ho;Lim, Woo-Taik;Park, Chool-Jae;Choi, Kum-Chan
서정민;이병인;정문섭;박정호;임우택;박출재;최금찬

  • Received : 2013.04.17
  • Accepted : 2013.06.03
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

The result of a small electrostatic precipitator which is in order to decrease indoor air pollution for optimal efficiency was shown as follows. Although the closer distance between the discharge electrode and dust collecting electrode shows the better throughput efficiency by forming strong electrostatic Field, it does not have profound impact in case of optimal dust collecting area. G.P(gas passage) which is the distance from dust collecting electrode to dust collecting electrode is a crucial factor to decide dust collecting efficiency. The narrower distance of G.P shows the better throughput efficiency whereas it decreases when the distance is too narrow since sparks ensue by increasing the capacity of electrostatic charging system 5 mm regards as optimal efficiency in this experiment. Although the higher voltage shows the higher dust collecting efficiency overall, the experiment was not able to keep performing since the sparks which decrease dust collecting efficiency ensue over 40 kV. The efficient and safe voltage state is considered 3.6 kV in this experiment. The most crucial factor for dust collecting efficiency of an electrostatic precipitator which is in order to decrease indoor air pollution is applied voltage. In addition, optimal raw gas flow rate(2.4 m/sec) is more important factor than the excessive increase of dust collecting area.

Keywords

Electrostatic precipitator;Indoor air pollution;DOP penetration test;Discharge electrode;Discharge electrode

References

  1. Atmospheric Environment Research co-authorship, 1995, Introduction to Air Pollution, Donghwa Technology Publishing, 81-106.
  2. EPA, 1992, Respiratory health effects of passive smokin, EPA publication 600, 6-90.
  3. Hines, A. L, 1933, Indoor Air Quality and Control, New Jersey PTR PrenticeHall.
  4. Joma, J, 1992, Aerosol Formation in real Scale Pulverized Coal Combustion, J. of Aero Sci & Tech, 23(1), S241-S244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(92)90394-B
  5. Kim, Y. S., Roh, Y. M., Hong, S. H., Lee, C. M., Kim, J. C., Cho, J. H., 2005, A Survey of Indoor Air Quality in Public Facilities, Korean Society for Indoor Environment, 1(2), 144-155.
  6. Lee, C. M., Kim, Y. S., 2004, Analysis of Research Trend for Indoor Air Pollutants and Health Risk Assessment in Public Facilities, Korean Society for Indoor Environment, 1(1), 39-60.
  7. NAS, 1993, Human Exposure Assessment for Airborne Pollutants, Washington DC.
  8. Robinson, J., Nelson, W. C, 1995, "National Human Activity Pattern Servey Data Base", United States Environemtal Protecton Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  9. Tichenor, B. A., Sparks, L. A., White, J. B., and Jackson, M. D., 1990, Evaluation sources of indoor air pollution, J. Air & Waste Management Association, 40, 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466703
  10. Wade, W. A., Cote, W. A., and Yocom, J. E., 1975, A study of indoor air quality, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 25(9), 933-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1975.10468114