DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physicochemical Properties of Topsoil Used for River Improvement and Non-Improvement Areas

  • Received : 2013.06.20
  • Accepted : 2013.10.21
  • Published : 2013.10.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the physicochemical properties and perform a feasibility analysis of planting material composed of topsoil from river improvement and non-improvement areas. The results showed that the physicochemical properties of topsoil from river improvement areas were on the average sandy loam~loamy sand in soil texture, 5.6~6.8 in pH, 0.01~0.06 dS/m in EC, 0.9~2.1% in OM, 0.02~0.12% in T-N, 8~14 $cmol^+/kg$ in CEC, 0.01~0.08 $cmol^+/kg$ in Ex. $K^+$, 2.55~11.11 $cmol^+/kg$ in Ex. $Ca^{2+}$, 0.34~2.06 $cmol^+/kg$ in Ex. $Mg^{2+}$, and 3~396 mg/kg in Av. $P_2O_5$. And non-improvement areas showed on average sandy clay loam~sand in soil texture, 5.7~6.7 in pH, 0.02~0.08 dS/m in EC, 0.9~4.4% in OM, 0.02~0.23% in T-N, 7~18 $cmol^+/kg$ in CEC, 0.01~0.08 $cmol^+/kg$ in Ex. $K^+$, 3.81~12.67 $cmol^+/kg$ in Ex. $Ca^{2+}$, 0.60~1.95 $cmol^+/kg$ in Ex. $Mg^{2+}$, and 3~171 mg/kg in Av. $P_2O_5$. Meanwhile, the results of an applied valuation of topsoil- based planting were as follows. Ex. $K^+$ levels were low grade in all survey areas. OM was low grade in 12 improvement areas and 11 non-improvement areas. Av. $P_2O_5$ levels were low grade in 10 improvement areas and 10 non-improvement areas. T-N was low grade in six improvement areas and four non-improvement areas. Ex. $Mg^{2+}$ levels were low grade in two improvement areas.

Keywords

Topsoil;River improvement;Physicochemical properties;Planting base

References

  1. Park, E. J., Kang, K. Y., Yi, S. R., 2008, The status of soil exposure and management practices for soil conservation in urban watersheds, 06/2008, Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  2. Jeong, J. H., Kim, C. S., Goo, K. S., Lee, C. H., Won, H. G., Byun, J. G., 2003, Physico-chemical properties of Korean forest soils by parent rocks, Korean Forest Society, 92(3), 254-262.
  3. Rural Development Administration, 2000. Soil and Plant analysis method, Rural Development Administration, 113-119.
  4. Yoo, S. H., 2000, Soil dictionary, Seoul National University Press, 369.
  5. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2007, Landscape Design Standard, Kimoondang Press, 356.
  6. Cho, Y. H., Kim, G. S., 2000, A preliminary study on application of alluvial deposit in the Han river for planting soil, The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 3(4), 60-73.
  7. Kim, W. T., Yoon, Y. H., Cho, Y. H., Kang, H. K., Park, B. J., Shin, K. J., Eo, Y. J., Yoon, T. S., Jang, K. E., Kwak, M. Y., Song, H. S., 2012, Comparison of phusicochemical properties of topsoil from forest development and non-development area, Journal of the Enviromental Sciences, 21(11), 1389-1394. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2012.21.11.1389