DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Role of Wnt signaling in fracture healing

  • Xu, Huiyun (Key Laboratory for Space Biosciences & Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Duan, Jing (Key Laboratory for Space Biosciences & Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Ning, Dandan (Key Laboratory for Space Biosciences & Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Li, Jingbao (Key Laboratory for Space Biosciences & Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Liu, Ruofei (Key Laboratory for Space Biosciences & Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Yang, Ruixin (Key Laboratory for Space Biosciences & Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Jiang, Jean X. (Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio) ;
  • Shang, Peng (Key Laboratory for Space Biosciences & Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.05
  • 심사 : 2014.09.29
  • 발행 : 2014.12.31

초록

The Wnt signaling pathway is well known to play major roles in skeletal development and homeostasis. In certain aspects, fracture repair mimics the process of bone embryonic development. Thus, the importance of Wnt signaling in fracture healing has become more apparent in recent years. Here, we summarize recent research progress in the area, which may be conducive to the development of Wnt-based therapeutic strategies for bone repair.

INTRODUCTION

‘Wnt’ was named after both the Drosophila Wg (wingless) gene (1) and the homolog of mouse mammary oncogene Int-1 (2). Wnts now comprise a family of secreted glycoproteins and play critical roles in embryonic development, carcinogenesis, and other important physical processes, such as bone metabolism. To date, 19 different Wnt proteins have been found in humans and mice, including WNT1-WNT11, and WNT16 (3). It is well known that the Wnt signaling pathway plays several major roles in skeletal development and homeostasis (4, 5). To a certain degree, the process of fracture repair is similar to that of embryonic bone development (6). Thus, in recent years, increasing attention has been placed on the role of Wnt signaling in fracture healing (4,7,8).

As a regenerative tissue, bone is able to repair itself after a fracture. However, ~3-10% of fractures fail to heal properly, with issues such as delayed union and non-union (9). In the United States, it is estimated that 100,000 fractures lead to non-union each year (10). Thus, it is important to find new anabolic agents that enhance bone regeneration and promote bone repair to improve the quality of treatment for fracture patients. In this article, we summarize some of the findings on the role of Wnt signaling pathway in fracture healing.

 

WNT SIGNALING PATHWAY

In the canonical Wnt signal pathway, the Wnt protein binds to the membrane receptor ‘Frizzled’ (Fzd) (11), which is a seven-transmembrane protein. Then, together with other coreceptors, LRP5 and LRP6 (low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein) (12), the protein activates ‘disheveled’ (Dsh), which inhibits the activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β). Inactive GSK-3β is unable to phosphorylate β-catenin, so the unphosphorylated β-catenin escapes degradation by the proteasome complex, then translocates into the nucleus and associates with transcription factors ‘T cell factor 7’ (Tcf7) and ‘lymphoid enhancing factor 1’ (Lef1) to regulate the expression of relevant genes (13). In the β-catenin-independent non-canonical Wnt signal pathway, calcium signaling is thought to be the central mediator (14-16). The interaction of Wnts and Fzd leads to the formation of a tri-protein complex of Dsh-Axin-GSK, which mediates the phosphorylation of co-receptor tyrosine-protein kinase transmembrane receptor 1/2 (Ror1/2). The binding of Wnts to Fzd and Ror1/2 activates membrane-bound phospholipase C (PLC) and causes an increase in the concentration of inositol triphosphate (IP3), 1,2 diacylglycerol (DAG), and intracellular calcium. This leads to alterations in downstream cellular function (17). Additionally, some secreted proteins, such as Dkk (dickkopf), Sost (sclerostin), and Sfrp (secreted frizzled-related proteins), may interact with LRP5/6 or Fzd receptor, and act as antagonists, inhibiting the Wnt signaling pathway (18-20).

 

FRACTURE HEALING

Fracture healing is a complex biological process that involves different types of bone cells and the interactions between cells, growth factors, and extracellular matrix. The repair consists of four overlapping stages: inflammatory response (also known as hematoma formation), soft callus formation, hard callus formation, and bone remodeling (21). During the process, bone cells are sequentially activated to form new bone. After hematoma formation, mesenchymal stem cells are recruited and proliferate and differentiate into osteogenic cells: chondrocytes and osteoblasts. The chondrocytes form a soft callus, which gives the fracture a stable structure. Later, the soft callus is mineralized and replaced with bone through endochondral ossification. At the same time, osteoblasts mineralize, generating a hard callous through intramembranous ossification. Finally, osteoclasts and osteoblasts are responsible for the bone remodeling process, which establishes new bone tissues (21-24).

 

WNT SIGNALING AND FRACTURE HEALING

During the repair process, the expression of many Wnt ligands (WNT4, 5b, 10b, 11, and 13) and receptors Fz1, 2, 4, and 5 are upregulated during fracture healing (25). Also, some target proteins of the Wnt pathway, such as c-myc and connexin 43, are activated (26, 27). These results have shown the role of Wnt signaling in regulating bone formation during the repair process.

β-catenin

Several studies have shown the activation of β-catenin signaling at fracture sites (28-31). Chen et al. have shown that β-catenin protein is highly expressed during the entire period of fracture repair (25). They used loss-of-function and gain-offunction approaches and found that in the early stage of healing, β-catenin controls the differentiation of mesenchymal cells, into osteoblasts and chondrocytes. Either an increase or a decrease of β-catenin interferes with the early stage of bone healing. In the later stages, when cells are committed to be osteoblasts, β-catenin promotes the differentiation of osteoblasts into bone and stimulates fracture healing (25).

LRP

LRP5 and LRP6 are required for successful fracture repair. The common genetic variants of LRP5 and LRP6 lead to decreased bone mass and bone mineral density (BMD). Furthermore, these variants have been shown to increase fracture risk in large cohorts of elderly Australian women (32) and Caucasian men (33). LRP5 mutations in mice have been shown to delay the repair of mandibular bone (28). Lrp5-/- mice show impaired bone repair, with reduced callus area, bone mineral content (BMC), BMD, and biomechanical properties (34). A gain-offunction mutation in LRP5 delayed mandibular (28) and tibial (31) skeletal repair due to early repair stage exuberant cell proliferation, which postponed osteoblast differentiation at the injury site.

GSK-3β

The function of GSK-3β during fracture healing has been investigated using inhibitors of GSK-3β. Oral treatment with lithium chloride (LiCl), a known inhibitor of GSK-3β (35), can activate Wnt signaling and accelerate fracture repair. However, this effect only occurred in the later phases of repair when mesenchymal cells have committed to become osteoblasts. Early lithium treatment, before the fracture, causes the aggregation of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells and reduces bone at fracture sites (25). LiCl attenuates the damaging effects of alcohol exposure on healing by restoring cartilaginous callous formation and endochondral ossification at fracture sites (36). For human cases, LiCl treatment is associated with a decreased risk of fractures (37). The oral administration of AZD2858, a bioactive GSK3 inhibitor, heals fractures rapidly and increases the strength of healed bone versus vehicle-treated controls (38).

Sfrp1

Sfrp1 interacts directly with Fzd or Wnts to antagonize canonical Wnt signaling (39). The expression of sfrp increases in Wnt-dependent early bone formation, along with the enhancement of β-catenin expression. Sfrp1-deficient mice have increased BMD, bone volume, and mineral apposition in the trabecular region, but not in the cortical region (40). Microarray expression analysis shows a significant decrease in the expression of sfrps 4 days after fracture. However, sfrp1 and sfrp4 are upregulated at both day 8 and day 14 after fracture, indicating negative regulation of bone formation during the osteogenic phase of repair at the injury site (29). The loss of sfrp1 function in vivo improves fracture repair by directly shifting progenitor cells into osteoblast lineage to promote early bone union. The sfrp1-/- mice showed a dramatic reduction in the cartilage callous, and increased intramembranous bone formation at day 14 after fracture. These mice also exhibited earlier bone remodeling during the 28 day fracture repair process than wild-type mice (41).

Sost

Sost is a secreted glycoprotein expressed primarily by osteocytes in bone tissue. Sost binds to the extracellular domain of LRP5 and LRP6 and disrupts the formation of Wnt-LRP complex (42). Sost knockout mice have increased BMD, bone volume, bone formation, and bone strength (43, 44). Also, these mice have more bone in the fracture healing defect, which is due to an enhancement of the thickness of trabecularized spicules and osteoblast numbers (44, 45). Kambiz Sarahrudi et al. showed the first evidence demonstrating that Sost increases significantly during human fracture repair (46). Several in vivo studies have shown that systemic administration of Sost antibodies increased bone formation significantly at the site of fractures in several animal models, including mice, rats, and cynomolgus monkeys (44, 47-53). Antibody treatment improved bone density and the strength of non-fractured bones (47, 52). Anti-Sost therapy represents a promising approach for osteoporosis and fracture healing.

Dkk1

Dkk1 forms a complex with Lrp5/6 and disrupts the Wnt signaling pathway (54). Dkk1 allele deletion mice have increased bone mass without affecting the bone resorption process (55). Kim et al. showed that adenoviral expression of Dkk1 effectively prevented the differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells and blocked bone formation at the injury site (31). Also, Dkk1 treatment caused a large amount of undifferentiated mesenchymal-like tissues and reduced chondrogenic differentiation at fracture sites (25). Dkk1 antibodies significantly promoted fracture repair only when treated on the first day, not 4 days after the operation (34). Inhibition of Dkk1 enhanced the healing process, resulting in mechanically stronger bone at the fracture site (56).

 

INTERACTION BETWEEN WNTS AND OTHER BONE REGULATORY MOLECULES DURING FRACTURE HEALING

There are also other molecules that play roles in fracture healing process also via interactions with Wnt signaling.

Cx43

As the most abundant gap junction protein in bone, connexin43 (Cx43) is essential for bone homeostasis. Also, recent studies by Loiselle et al. have shown the role of Cx43 in fracture repair. Targeted deletion of Cx43 in osteoblasts/osteocytes delayed bone formation and impaired mechanical properties during fracture healing. In Cx43-deficient fractures, β-catenin expression was attenuated, while Sost expression was increased. The changes in fracture healing in Cx43-deficient mice can be rescued by restoring β-catenin expression through inhibition of GSK-3β activity with LiCl treatment (57, 58). Cx43 may be a potential therapeutic target to enhance fracture healing via regulating β-catenin expression.

PTH

As a clinically approved anabolic drug used to treat osteoporosis, parathyroid hormone (PTH) is thought to also be effective for fracture repair (59), which is at least partially Wnt dependent (60). PTH enhances the expression of several Wnts and nuclear localized βcatenin protein (30). It also induces Lrp5/6 expression in the fracture callus, and promotes levels of Dkk1 and Sost during fracture healing.

BMP

Another growth factor used to accelerate bone healing is bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) (61-64), which can also cooperate with the Wnt signaling to promote osteoblast differentiation and new bone formation (65, 66). Wnt signaling is involved in chondrogenesis process induced by BMP-2. LiCl treatment decreased the upregulation of LEF-1 and βcatenin induced by BMP-2 during later chondrogenesis (67). BMP-induced bone formation could be inhibited by Sost, both in vitro and in vivo (68, 69). Yan Yiu Yu et al. have shown that in BMP-treated calluses, the Wnt pathway is activated (70).

 

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge on Wnt signaling during the fracture repair process, which involves a well-organized interaction of various bone cells and activated regulatory factors (Table 1). Generally, activation of Wnt signaling is helpful to accelerate bone repair, and mutations in β-catenin or LRP5/6 reduce bone healing. Moreover, inhibition of negative regulators in the Wnt signaling pathway, such as GSK-3β and Sost, can improve bone formation at fracture sites. Thus, inhibitors of GSK-3β and Sost neutralizing antibodies may be promising and feasible targets for bone repair. Unfortunately, efforts to develop Sost antibodies for fracture healing have been abandoned by Amgen and their partner UCB, mainly due to the high investment requirement and the smaller market for fracture healing than osteoporosis. Thus, more hope should be placed on inhibitors of GSK-3β for developing drugs to promote bone repair. Nonetheless, there is a long way to go. More work remains to be done in clinical and basic research to optimize treatment strategies. For example, the disparate roles of Wnts in different phases of fractures should be considered in the future development of therapeutic strategies.

Table 1.Summary of the published in vivo studies of the role of Wnt signaling in fracture healing

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Welch Foundation

참고문헌

  1. Nusslein-Volhard, C. and Wieschaus, E. (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287, 795-801. https://doi.org/10.1038/287795a0
  2. Rijsewijk, F., Schuermann, M., Wagenaar, E., Parren, P., Weigel, D. and Nusse, R. (1987) The Drosophila homology of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell 50, 649-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90038-9
  3. Nusse, R. and Varmus, H. (2012) Three decades of Wnts: a personal perspective on how a scientific field developed. EMBO J. 31, 2670-2684. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.146
  4. Regard, J. B., Zhong, Z., Williams, B. O. and Yang, Y. (2012) Wnt signaling in bone development and disease: making stronger bone with Wnts. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a007997.
  5. Chen, Y. and Alman, B. A. (2009) Wnt pathway, an essential role in bone regeneration. J. Cell. Biochem. 106, 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.22020
  6. Bruder, S. P., Fink, D. J. and Caplan, A. I. (1994) Mesenchymal stem cells in bone development, bone repair, and skeletal regenaration therapy. J. Cell. Biochem. 56, 283-294.
  7. Silkstone, D., Hong, H. and Alman, B. A. (2008) ${\beta}$-Catenin in the race to fracture repair: in it to Wnt. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 4, 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0838
  8. Einhorn, T. A. (2010) The Wnt signaling pathway as a potential target for therapies to enhance bone repair. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 42ps36.
  9. Tzioupis, C. and Giannoudis, P. V. (2007) Prevalence of long-bone non-unions. Injury 38, S3-S9.
  10. Hak, D. J., Fitzpatrick, D., Bishop, J. A., Marshd, J. L., Tilpe, S., Schnettlere, R., Simpsonf, H. and Alte, V. (2014) Delayed union and nonunions: Epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects. Injury 45, S3-S7.
  11. Bhanot, P., Brink, M., Samos, C. H., Hsieh, J. C., Wang, Y., Macke, J. P., Andrew, D., Nathans, J. and Nusse, R. (1996) A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature 382, 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1038/382225a0
  12. He, X., Semenov, M., Tamai, K. and Zeng, X. (2004) LDL receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/${\beta}$-catenin signaling: arrows point the way. Development 131, 1663-1677. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01117
  13. Eastman, Q. and Grosschedl, R. (1999) Regulation of LEF-1/TCF transcription factors by Wnt and other signals. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80031-3
  14. Slusarski, D. C., Corces, V. G. and Moon, R. T. (1997) Interaction of Wnt and a Frizzled homologue triggers G-protein-linked phosphatidylinositol signalling. Nature 390, 410-413. https://doi.org/10.1038/37138
  15. Nusse, R. (1999) WNT targets: repression and activation. Trends Genet. 15, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01634-5
  16. De, A. (2011) Wnt/$Ca^{2+}$ signaling pathway: a brief overview. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 43, 745-756. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmr079
  17. Kuhl, M. (2004) The WNT/calcium pathway: biochemical mediators, tools and future requirements. Front. Biosci. 9, 967-974. https://doi.org/10.2741/1307
  18. Nakamura, R. E. I. and Hackam, A. S. (2010) Analysis of Dickkopf3 interactions with Wnt signaling receptors. Growth Factors 28, 232-242. https://doi.org/10.3109/08977191003738832
  19. Hoeppner, L. H., Secreto, F. J. and Westendorf, J. J. (2009) Wnt signaling as a therapeutic target for bone diseases. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 13, 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728220902841961
  20. Patthy, L. (2000) The WIF module. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01504-2
  21. Einhorn, T. A. (1998) The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 355, S7-S21.
  22. Marsell, R. and Einhorn, T. A. (2011) The biology of fracture healing. Injury 42, 551-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031
  23. Schindeler, A., McDonald, M. M., Bokko, P. and Little, D. G. (2008) Bone remodeling during fracture repair: The cellular picture. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.004
  24. Phillips, A. M. (2005) Overview of the fracture healing cascade. Injury 36, S5-S7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.027
  25. Chen, Y., Whetstone, H. C., Lin, A. C., Nadesan, P., Wei, Q., Poon, R. and Alman, B. A. (2007) Beta-catenin signaling plays a disparate role in different phases of fracture repair: implications for therapy to improve bone healing. PLoS Med. 4, e249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040249
  26. Hadjiargyrou, M., Lombardo, F., Zhao, S., Ahrens, W., Joo, J., Ahn, H., Jurman, M., White, D. W. and Rubin, C. T. (2002) Transcriptional profiling of bone regeneration Insight into the molecular complexity of wound repair. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 30177-30182. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M203171200
  27. Zhong, N., Gersch, R. P. and Hadjiargyrou, M. (2006) Wnt signaling activation during bone regeneration and the role of Dishevelled in chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Bone 39, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.12.008
  28. Leucht, P., Kim, J. B. and Helms, J. A. (2008) Beta-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling in mandibular bone regeneration. J. Bone Joint. Surg. 90, 3-8.
  29. Macsai, C. E., Georgiou, K. R., Foster, B. K., Zannettino, A. C. W. and Xian, C. J. (2012) Microarray expression analysis of genes and pathways involved in growth plate cartilage injury responses and bony repair. Bone 50, 1081-1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.013
  30. Kakar, S., Einhorn, T. A., Vora, S., Miara, L. J., Hon, G., Wigner, N. A., Toben, D., Jacobsen, K. A., Al-Sebaei, M. O., Song, M., Trackman, P. C., Morgan, E. F., Gerstenfeld, L. and Barnes, G. L. (2007) Enhanced chondrogenesis and Wnt signaling in PTH-treated fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22, 1903-1912. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.070724
  31. Kim, J. B., Leucht, P., Lam, K., Luppen, C., Ten Berge, D., Nusse, R. and Helms, J. A. (2007) Bone regeneration is regulated by wnt signaling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22, 1913-1923. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.070802
  32. Bollerslev, J., Wilson, S. G., Dick, I. M., Dick, I. M., Islam, F. M. A., Ueland, T., Palmer, L., Devine, A., Prince, R. L. (2005) LRP5 gene polymorphisms predict bone mass and incident fractures in elderly Australian women. Bone 36, 599-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.01.006
  33. van Meurs, J. B. J., Rivadeneira, F., Jhamai, M., Hugens, W., Hofman, A., van Leeuwen, J. P., Pols, H. A. and Uitterlinden, A. G. (2006) Common genetic variation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 and 6 genes determines fracture risk in elderly white men. J. Bone Miner. Res. 21, 141-150.
  34. Komatsu, D. E., Mary, M. N., Schroeder, R. J., Robling, A. G., Turner, C. H. and Warden, S. J. (2010) Modulation of Wnt signaling influences fracture repair. J. Orthop. Res. 28, 928-936.
  35. Phiel, C. J. and Klein, P. S. (2001) Molecular targets of lithium action. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 41, 789-813. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.789
  36. Lauing, K. L., Sundaramurthy, S., Nauer, R. K. and Callaci, J. J. (2014) Exogenous activation of Wnt/${\beta}$-Catenin signaling attenuates binge alcohol-induced deficient bone fracture healing. Alcohol. Alcohol. 9, 399-408.
  37. Vestergaard, P., Rejnmark, L. and Mosekilde, L. (2005) Reduced relative risk of fractures among users of lithium. Calcif. Tissue Int. 77, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-004-0258-y
  38. Sisask, G., Marsell, R., Sundgren-Andersson, A., Larsson, S., Nilsson, O., Ljunggren, O. and Jonsson, K. B. (2013) Rats treated with AZD2858, a GSK3 inhibitor, heal fractures rapidly without endochondral bone formation. Bone 54, 126-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.019
  39. Kawano, Y. and Kypta, R. (2003) Secreted antagonists of the Wnt signalling pathway. J. Cell Sci. 116, 2627-2634. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00623
  40. Bodine, P. V. N., Zhao, W., Kharode, Y. P., Bex, F. J., Lambert, A. J., Goad, M. B., Gaur, T., Stein, G. S., Lian, J. B., and Komm, B. S. (2004) The Wnt antagonist secreted frizzled-related protein-1 is a negative regulator of trabecular bone formation in adult mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 18, 1222-1237. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2003-0498
  41. Gaur, T., Wixted, J. J., Hussain, S., O'Connell, S. L., Morgan, E. F., Ayers, D. C., Komm, B. S., Bodine, P. V., Stein, G. S. and Lian, J. B. (2009) Secreted frizzled related protein 1 is a target to improve fracture healing. J. Cell. Physiol. 220, 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21747
  42. Semenov, M., Tamai, K. and He, X. (2005) Sost is a ligand for lrp5/lrp6 and a wnt signaling inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 26770-26775. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504308200
  43. Li, X., Ominsky, M. S., Niu, Q. T., Sun, N., Daugherty, B., D'Agostin, D., Kurahara, C., Gao, Y., Cao, J., Gong, J., Asuncion, F., Barrero, M., Warmington, K., Dwyer, D., Stolina, M., Morony, S., Sarosi, I., Kostenuik, P. J., Lacey, D. L., Simonet, W. S., Ke, H. Z. and Paszty, C. (2008) Targeted deletion of the sclerostin gene in mice results in increased bone formation and bone strength. J. Bone Miner. Res. 23, 860-869. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.080216
  44. McGee-Lawrence, M. E., Ryan, Z. C., Carpio, L. R., Kakar, S., Westendorf, J. J. and Kumar, R. (2013) Sclerostin deficient mice rapidly heal bone defects by activating ${\beta}$-catenin and increasing intramembranous ossification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 441, 886-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.155
  45. Li, C., Ominsky, M. S., Tan, H. L., Barrero, M., Niu, Q. T., Asuncion, F. J., Lee, E., Liu, M., Simonet, W. S., Paszty, C. and Ke, H. Z. (2011) Increased callus mass and enhanced strength during fracture healing in mice lacking the sclerostin gene. Bone 49, 1178-1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.012
  46. Sarahrudi, K., Thomas, A., Albrecht, C. and Aharinejad, S. (2012) Strongly enhanced levels of sclerostin during human fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 30, 1549-1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22129
  47. Ominsky, M. S., Li, C., Li, X., Tan, H. L., Lee, E., Barrero, M., Asuncion, F. J., Dwyer, D., Han, C. Y., Vlasseros, F., Samadfam, R., Jolette, J., Smith, S. Y., Stolina, M., Lacey, D. L., Simonet, W. S., Paszty, C., Li, G. and Ke, H. Z. (2011) Inhibition of sclerostin by monoclonal antibody enhances bone healing and improves bone density and strength of nonfractured bones. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 1012-1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.307
  48. Virk, M. S., Alaee, F., Tang, H., Ominsky, M. S., Ke, H. Z. and Lieberman, J. R. (2013) Systemic administration of sclerostin antibody enhances bone repair in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model. J. Bone Joint. Surg. 95, 694-701. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00285
  49. Gamie, Z., Korres, N., Leonidou, A., Gray, A. C. and Tsiridis, E. (2012) Sclerostin monoclonal antibodies on bone metabolism and fracture healing. Exper. Opin. Inv. Drug 21, 1523-1534. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2012.713936
  50. Jawad, M. U., Fritton, K. E., Ma, T., Ren, P. G., Goodman, S. B., Ke, H. Z., Babij, P. and Genovese, M. C. (2013) Effects of sclerostin antibody on healing of a non-critical size femoral bone defect. J. Orthop. Res. 31, 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22186
  51. Suen, P. K., He, Y. X., Chow, D. H. K., Huang, L., Li, C., Ke, H. Z., Ominsky, M. S. and Qin, L. (2014) Sclerostin monoclonal antibody enhanced bone fracture healing in an open osteotomy model in rats. J. Orthop. Res. 32, 997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22636
  52. Agholme, F., Li, X., Isaksson, H., Ke, H. Z. and Aspenberg, P. (2010) Sclerostin antibody treatment enhances metaphyseal bone healing in rats. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 2412-2418. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.135
  53. Alaee, F., Virk, M. S., Tang. H., Sugiyama, O., Adams, D. J., Stolina, M., Dwyer, D., Ominsky, M. S., Ke, H. Z. and Lieberman, J. R. (2014) Evaluation of the effects of systemic treatment with a sclerostin neutralizing antibody on bone repair in a rat femoral defect model. J. Orthop. Res. 32, 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22498
  54. Glinka, A., Wu, W., Delius, H., Monaghan, A. P., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1998) Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature 391, 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1038/34848
  55. Morvan, F., Boulukos, K., Clement-Lacroix, P., Roman, S. R., Suc-Royer, I., Vayssiere, B., Ammann, P., Martin, P., Pinho, S., Pognonec, P., Mollat, P., Niehrs, C., Baron, R. and Rawadi, G. (2006) Deletion of a single allele of the Dkk1 gene leads to an increase in bone formation and bone mass. J. Bone Miner. Res. 21, 934-945. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060311
  56. Li, X., Grisanti, M., Fan, W., Asuncion, F. J., Tan, H. L., Dwyer, D., Han, C. Y., Yu, L., Lee, J., Lee, E., Barrero, M., Kurimoto, P., Niu, Q. T., Geng, Z., Winters, A., Horan, T., Steavenson, S., Jacobsen, F., Chen, Q., Haldankar, R., Lavallee, J., Tipton, B., Daris, M., Sheng, J., Lu, H. S., Daris, K., Deshpande, R., Valente, E. G., Salimi-Moosavi, H., Kostenuik, P. J., Li, J., Liu, M., Li, C., Lacey, D. L., Simonet, W. S., Ke, H. Z., Babij, P., Stolina, M., Ominsky, M. S., Richards, W. G. (2011) Dickkopf-1 regulates bone formation in young growing rodents and upon traumatic injury. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 2610-2621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.472
  57. Loiselle, A. E., Lloyd, S. A. J., Paul, E. M., Lewis, G. S. and Donahue, H. J. (2013) Inhibition of GSK-3${\beta}$ rescues the impairments in bone formation and mechanical properties associated with fracture healing in osteoblast selective connexin 43 deficient mice. PloS one 8, e81399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081399
  58. Loiselle, A. E., Paul, E. M., Lewis, G. S. and Donahue, H. J. (2013) Osteoblast and osteocyte-specific loss of Connexin43 results in delayed bone formation and healing during murine fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 31, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22178
  59. Aspenberg, P. (2013) Annotation: Parathyroid hormone and fracture healing. Acta. Orthop. 84, 4-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.771301
  60. Bodine, P. V. N., Seestaller-Wehr, L., Kharode, Y. P., Bex, F. G. and Komm, B. S. (2007) Bone anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone are blunted by deletion of the Wnt antagonist secreted frizzled-related protein-1. J. Cell. Physiol. 210, 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.20834
  61. Ronga, M., Fagetti, A., Canton, G., Paiusco, E., Surace, M. F. and Cherubino, P. (2013) Clinical applications of growth factors in bone injuries: experience with BMPs. Injury 44, S34-S39.
  62. Bostrom, M. P., Lane, J. M., Berberian, W. S., Missri, A. A., Tomin, E., Weiland, A., Doty, S. B., Glaser, D. and Rosen, V. M. (1995) Immunolocalization and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 13, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100130309
  63. Fourman, M. S., Borst, E. W., Bogner, E., Rozbruch, R. and Fragomen, A. T. (2014) Recombinant human BMP-2 increases the incidence and rate of healing in complex ankle arthrodesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 472, 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3261-7
  64. Lissenberg-Thunnissen, S. N., de Gorter, D. J., Sier, C. F. and Schipper, I. B. (2011) Use and efficacy of bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture healing. Int. Orthop. 35, 1271-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1301-z
  65. Mbalaviele, G., Sheikh, S., Stains, J. P., Salazar, V. S., Cheng, S., Chen, D. and Civitelli, R. (2005) ${\beta}$-Catenin and BMP-2 synergize to promote osteoblast differentiation and new bone formation. J. Cell. Biochem. 94, 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20253
  66. Chen, Y., Whetstone, H. C., Youn, A., Nadesan, P., Chow, E. C. Y., Lin, A. C. and Alman, B. A. (2007) ${\beta}$-catenin signaling pathway is crucial for bone morphogenetic protein 2 to induce new bone formation. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M602700200
  67. Fischer, L., Boland, G. and Tuan, R. S. (2002) Wnt signaling during BMP-2 stimulation of mesenchymal chondrogenesis. J. Cell. Biochem. 84, 816-831. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10091
  68. Lowik, C. and Van Bezooijen, R. L. (2006) Wnt signaling is involved in the inhibitory action of sclerostin on BMP-stimulated bone formation. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal. Interact. 6, 357.
  69. van Bezooijen, R. L., Svensson, J. P., Eefting, D., Visser, A., van der Horst, G., Karperien, M., Quax, P. H., Vrieling, H., Papapoulos, S. E., ten Dijke, P. and Lowik, C. W. (2007) Wnt but Not BMP signaling is involved in the inhibitory action of sclerostin on BMP-stimulated bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22, 19-28.
  70. Yu, Y.Y., Lieu, S., Miclau, T., Colnot, C. and Marcucio, R. (2011) Effects of bone morphogenetic proteins on tgf-beta, wnt and bmp pathways during tibial fracture repair. FASEB J. 25 (Meeting Abstract Supplement), 680.

피인용 문헌

  1. Increased Runx2 expression associated with enhanced Wnt signaling in PDLLA internal fixation for fracture treatment vol.13, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4216
  2. High Plasma Concentrations of Sclerostin, an Inhibitor of the Wnt Signaling Pathway, in Young Horses Affected by Osteochondrosis vol.04, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2014.412051
  3. CKIP-1 silencing promotes new bone formation in rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis vol.123, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.07.013
  4. Local and targeted drug delivery for bone regeneration vol.40, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.029
  5. The role of CKIP-1 in osteoporosis development and treatment vol.7, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.72.BJR-2017-0172.R1
  6. Cortistatin inhibits arterial calcification in rats via GSK3β/β-catenin and protein kinase C signalling but not c-Jun N-terminal kinase signalling vol.223, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13055
  7. Wnt Pathway in Bone Repair and Regeneration – What Do We Know So Far vol.6, pp.2296-634X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00170