DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synthesis and Characterization of Superparamagnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 Nanoparticles

  • Kulkarni, Sachnin A. (Department of CEES, MIT College of Engineering) ;
  • Sawadh, P.S. (Department of Physics, B.D. College of Engineering) ;
  • Palei, Prakash K. (Department of CEES, MIT College of Engineering)
  • Received : 2013.10.28
  • Accepted : 2014.01.16
  • Published : 2014.02.20

Abstract

Magnetite nanoparticles were prepared by co-precipitation method and then silica was coated onto the surface of $Fe_3O_4$ by hydrolysis of TEOS. The silica coated magnetite nanoparticles were characterized for its structural, microstructural, optical, vibrational and magnetic properties by X-ray diffraction analysis, Scanning electron microscopy, UV-visible spectroscopy, Infrared spectroscopy and Vibration sample magnetometer, respectively. XRD study confirmed the presence of $SiO_2$ on the surface of magnetite nanoparticles. SEM study indicated that with increase in TEOS content the particles become bigger and mono-disperse. It was also found that the silica coating prevents magnetic particles from aggregation and imparts excellent stability.

Keywords

$Fe_3O_4$;Co-precipitation;Superparamagnetic;Aggregation

INTRODUCTION

Magnetite nanoparticles have received a great deal of attention because of their potential use in various biomedical applications, including contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic separation and sorting of cells and proteins, immunoassay in pathology laboratories, hyperthermia treatment for cancer tumors, controlled and targeted delivery of pharmaceuticals and therapeutic genes.1−10 Looking at the importance of magnetite nanoparticles, in recent years, much attention has been focused on the synthesis of uniformly sized magnetic nanoparticles.11−21

In spite of named benefits, there are some basic challenges in order to make magnetite nanoparticles suitable for various potential applications. One major problem associated with these nanoparticles (NPs) is that these are highly prone to aggregation because of their large specific surface area, high surface energy and high magnetization value. Therefore, they show poor dispersion in water as well as in organic solvents. Another problem with these NPs is that because of having Fe2+ ions, it oxidizes easily and is vulnerable to lose magnetism. Moreover, it is difficult to graft the surface of Fe3O4 NPs with organic materials since there are few hydroxyl groups present on their surface. 22 In order to solve these problems, coating of magnetite nanoparticles surface with various inorganic materials such as noble metals, metal oxides and silica within core/ shell structures, has been suggested. Among these coating materials, silica has allocated a special place to itself because of its unique properties such as chemical stability, biocompatibility, strong affinity towards magnetite and reactivity with various coupling agents.23−28

There are many reports in the literature which are focused on the synthesis of agglomeration free magnetite-silica composite nanoparticles, but most of the report shows illdefined structure and morphology as a result of ignoring pretreatment of magnetite before coating with silica.29 Very few works have been directed to study systematically the formation of well-defined silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles using TEOS.

It has been reported that the structure and morphology of the resultant nanocomposites cannot be well controlled if the prepared magnetite NPs by co-precipitation method were used directly without any treatment as seeds. According to the reports of Wang et al. Fe3O4 NPs coagulate during coating process which results in the formation of large aggregates of silica-coated magnetite NPs.30 Hence, the stabilization of magnetite NPs is necessary to enhance their dispersing stability in reaction media during the coating process prior to fabrication of the core/shell nanostructures. For this purpose, researchers have used various surfactants and stabilizers for surface modification of magnetic NPs during the synthesis process. This stability is based on creating electrostatic (due to ionic compounds) and steric (due to long-chain hydrocarbons) repulsion between NPs that can overcome the magnetic and surface-related attractions.31

Therefore, in this work, the silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles with different TEOS content have been synthesized by using a two step synthesis route. The magnetite nanoparticles are prepared by co-precipitation method. The as prepared magnetite nanoparticles are used to synthesize the Fe3O4@SiO2 nanocomposite using modified Stöber method. Initially, ammonium hydroxide was used to stabilize magnetite NPs. The surface morphology of the NPs was captured to confirm the formation of uniform silica- coated magnetite particles with core-shell structure. The structural, microstructural, optical and magnetic properties were studied to extract more detail information about the nanocomposite.

 

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Materials

For the synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles in this study, all chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Ferric chloride hexa-hydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), ferrous chloride tetra-hydrate (FeCl2·4H2O), tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), and ammonium solution (26% of ammonia) were purchased from Aldrich.

Co-precipitation Method

Ferric chloride and ferrous chloride were mixed in 2:1 molar ratio. The solutions of Fe2+ and Fe3+ were prepared by making their aqueous solutions in distilled water and this solution containing both ions was then heated up to 50 ℃ for 10 min. After heating, the solution was precipitated by ammonia solution with continuous stirring on the magnetic stirrer at 50 ℃. Black colored particles of iron oxide were precipitated. These particles were then separated from the solution by using a strong magnet and then were washed many times with distilled water. The precipitated magnetite is black in color. The powder was then dried in hot air oven at 100 ℃ for overnight. The overall reaction can be written as

Preparation of Fe3O4/SiO2 Nanoparticles

The Fe3O4 nanoparticles (0.25 g) were ultrasonicated for 1 h to make them uniformly disperse in anhydrous ethanol (40 mL). Concentrated ammonium hydroxide (4.5 mL) was diluted to the above solution, and TEOS (1 mL) was quickly added under vigorous stirring. The solution was left to stir for 12 h. The product was collected by centrifugation and washed with anhydrous ethanol three times. Now further Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles are synthesized at different TEOS volume of 1.5 mL and 2 mL.

Characterization

The phase formation of Fe3O4/SiO2 nanoparticles were analyzed using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Brukeraxs, D8 Advance) over the 2θ ranges from 20-70ᴼ at scan rate of 2°/min, using Cu-Káradiation (1.5408 A). The surface morphology of the samples was taken by using JEOL JSM 6480 LV scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained using Nicolet FTIR Avatar 360 (Nicolet, USA) with the KBr method. The Optical properties were studied by using UV CARY 100 Scan UV-visible Spectrophotometer. Magnetic properties (M-H curve) were measured with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Quantum Design) at room temperature.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of pure and modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles. XRD peaks of pure magnetite sample are found to be sharp and distinct indicating good crystallinity and homogeneity of the sample. The absence of secondary peaks ensures the good purity of the sample. However, in the Si doped magnetite samples, with the increase in dopant concentration the intensity of the peaks are found to decrease which may be due to the amorphous nature of Si. In case of doped samples a broad peak ~25 degree is observed which confirms the presence of Si in the sample. The SEM micrographs of the pure and modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles are shown in Fig. 2. It is found that with the increase in TEOS content clear and distinct spherical shaped particles are obtained. It can also be seen that the particle size is increased with the increase in TEOS content. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles are agglomerated seriously and the size is very small. But the composite nanoparticles are almost monodisperse with uniform size. It proves the dispersion of Fe3O4@SiO2 composite nanoparticles is apparently improved.

Figure 1.XRD pattern of pure and modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

Figure 2.SEM micrographs of (a) pure Fe3O4 (b) 1 ml TEOS (c) 1.5 ml TEOS and (d) 2 ml TEOS modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

Figure 3.UV-vis Spectra of pure Fe3O4 and Si modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

To determine the optical properties of the synthesized Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles the UV-vis Spectra (with DRS) were collected and are shown in Fig. 3. It can be observed that with increase in TEOS content the absorption peak is shifted towards the higher wavelength side i.e. red shift is observed. It is a well known fact that with the increase in particle size the band gap of a material decreases which results in the shifting of the absorption peak towards the higher wavelength side. This phenomenon occurs, since in a nanomaterial the energy levels are discretely defined and the energy level shifts according to the quantum size effect (QSE) but when the size of the particle increases the energy levels are no more discrete which decreases the band gap of the material.

Figure 4.FTIR Spectra of pure Fe3O4 and Si modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

In the present study it is observed that with the increase in TEOS content in the composite, the particle size of the composite was found to increase and hence the band gap decreases.

Fig. 4 shows the FTIR patterns of pure and SiO2 modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles. In case of pure magnetite nanoparticles, the presence of vibrational stretching band at ~570 and 400 cm−1 are attributed to the Fe−O bonding. With increase in TEOS concentration another band at ~1100 cm−1 is observed. In the SiO2 modified magnetite nanoparticles the presence of peaks at ~1100 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibration of Si−O bond. Along with Si−O band another bands at ~3400 and 1630 cm−1 is also observed. The absorption bands near ~3400 and 1630 cm−1 is attributed to the absorbed water or OH− on the surface of sample. Inset of Fig. 4 shows expanded view of this region. This figure clearly indicates that for pure Fe3O4 nanoparticles O−H or Si−O bonds are absent which confirms the formation of phase pure magnetite nanoparticles. However, O−H and Si−O related bands are observed with incorporation of TEOS. This data supports the formation of SiO2 shell on Fe3O4 nanoparticles. It is evident here that with the Increase in TEOS content the strength of Si−O bond increases.

Fig. 5 shows the magnetization vs. magnetic field loops of the pure and SiO2 modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Development of saturated loop confirms the magnetic nature of all the samples. The absence of hysteresis and remnant magnetization indicates that these particles are superpara-magnetic in nature.32 The saturation magnetization (Ms) is found to be strongly dependent on the particle size as well as TEOS content. The value of Ms (63.5) is found to be higher in case of pure Fe3O4 whereas with the increase in TEOS content it decreases. The decrease of Ms value with the increase of TEOS content in the composite can be attributed to the non-magnetic nature of SiO2 nanoparticles. The increase of the height of the Si−O band in the FTIR pattern at ~1100 cm−1 (Fig. 4) also supports this fact. The decrease of Ms value can also be explained in terms of the increase of particle size. The decrease in Ms value at smaller particles sizes is attributed to the noticeable surface effects in these nanoparticles. The surface of the nanoparticles is considered to be composed of some canted or disordered spins that prevent the core spins from aligning along the field direction resulting in decrease of the saturation magnetization of the small sized nanoparticles.33 Since all these samples show perfect superparamgnetic behavior, hence they are believed to be promising for wide range of engineering applications, such as drug delivery, bio-separation and magnetic resonance imaging.

Figure 5.Magnetic hysteresis loop of pure and Si modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

 

CONCLUSIONS

Fe3O4 nanoparticles are prepared by chemical co-precipitation method. Then silica was coated onto the surface of Fe3O4 by hydrolysis of TEOS. XRD patterns confirm the presence of SiO2 phase along with the magnetite phase in the sample. UV-vis spectra shows a red shift with increase in SiO2 doping. This is due to the fact that with increase in particle size the band gap of the material decreases. The magnetization measurements confirm that the samples are super paramagnetic in nature. The saturation magnetization (Ms) was found to decrease drastically with increase in SiO2 coating.

References

  1. Chu, M.; Shao, Y.; Peng, J.; Dai, X.; Li, H.; Wu, Q.; Shi, D. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 4078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.086
  2. Zhu, S.; Guo, J.; Dong, J.; Cui, Z.; Lu, T.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, D. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 2013, 20, 872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.12.001
  3. Wei, X.; Liu, T.; Li, J.; Chen, X. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6, 4953.
  4. Ito, A.; Ino, K.; Kobayashi, T. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 6185-6193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.039
  5. Uebe, R.; Henn, V.; Schuler, D. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 1018-1023. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.06356-11
  6. Chomoucka, J.; Drbohlavova, J.; Huska, D.; Adam, V. Kizek, R.; Hubalek, J. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62, 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2010.01.014
  7. Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yang, X. Analyst. 2011, 136, 4960. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1an15602k
  8. Xiong, C.; Yuan, X.-H.; Zhou, J.-D.; Chen, Y.; Chen, F.- H.; Xin, Xu, L. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharacol. 2013, 7, 666.
  9. Hu, F.; MacRenaris K.; Waters E.; Schultz-Sikma E.; Eckermann, A.; Meade, T. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 73-75. https://doi.org/10.1039/b916562b
  10. Xiao, L.; et al. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6315-6324. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn201348s
  11. Ataie, Kazemzadeh, H.; Nikkhah-Moshaie, R.; Ahmed, F.-M. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2009, 45.
  12. ElGhandoor, H.; Zidan, H.-M., Khalil Mostafa, M. H.; Ismail, M.-I.-M. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 5734.
  13. Hai, H.-T.; Kura, H.; Takahashi, M.; Ogawa, T. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 341, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.09.041
  14. Hua, Z.; Deng, Y.; Li, K.; Yang, S. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-129
  15. Liu, X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ren, J.-W.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Guo, Y.; Lu, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z. J. Mater. Sci. 2010,45, 906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-4019-1
  16. Mihoc, G.; Ianos, R.; Curariu, C.-P. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2013, 112, 391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-012-2750-3
  17. Zhang, S.; Wu, W.; Xiao, X.; Zhou J.; Ren, F.; Jiang, C. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-6-89
  18. Weia, Y.; Hanb, B.; Hua, X.; Linc, Y.; Wangd, X.; Denga, X. Procedia Eng. 2012, 27, 632-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.498
  19. Duan, L.-F.; Jia, S.-S.; Wang, T.-H.; Xue, B.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Zhao, L.-J. Met. Mater. Int. 2011, 17, 801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-011-1017-z
  20. Kazemzadeh, H. Int. J. Mod. Phys.: Conference Series 2012, 5, 160. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010194512001973
  21. Srivastava, V.; Singh, P.-K.; Weng, C.-H.; Sharma, Y.-C. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2011, 13, 1.
  22. Chin, S.-F.; Pang, S.-C.; Tan, C.-H. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2011, 2, 299.
  23. Zhu, Y.; Fang, Y.; Kaskel, S. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010, 114,16382. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp106685q
  24. Abid, A.-D.; Kanematsu, M.; Young, T.-M.; Kennedy, L.- M. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 2013, 47, 169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.735380
  25. Chang, C.-C.; Zhao, L.; Wus, M. K. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 094105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3504030
  26. Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Yu, A.; Zhang, H.; Song, D. Colloids Surf., B. 2011, 84, 484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.003
  27. Sun, W.; Sun, W.; Kessler, M.-R.; Bowler, N.; Dennis, K.- W.; McCallum, R.-W.; Li, Q.; Tan, X. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1636. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302520e
  28. Ahangaran, F.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Nouri, S. Int. Nano Lett. 2013, 3, 23.
  29. Deng, Y.; Wang, C.; Hu, J.; Yang, W.; Fu, S. Colloids Surf., A. 2005, 262, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.04.009
  30. Wang, H.; Nakamura, H.; Yao, Y.; Maeda, H.; Abe, E. Chem. Lett. 2001, 1, 1168.
  31. Helmi Rashid Farimani, M.; Shahtahmasebi, N.; Rezaee Roknabadi, M.; Ghowsc, N.; Kazemi, A. Physica E 2013, 53, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2013.04.032
  32. Kulkarni, S.-A.; Sawadh, P.-S.; Palei, P.-P.; Kokate, K.-K. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 1945-1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.103
  33. Maaz, K.; Karim, S.; Mumtaz, A.; Hasanain, S.-K.; Liu, J.; Duan, J.-L. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 1838-1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.098

Cited by

  1. Phosphanamine-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (PAFMNP): an efficient magnetic recyclable ligand for the Pd-catalyzed Heck reaction of chloroarenes vol.40, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ02409A
  2. Fabrication of Fe 3 O 4 -ZnO core-shell nanoparticles by rotational atomic layer deposition and their multi-functional properties vol.16, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2016.09.014
  3. Modification of Mg3Si2O5(OH)4 nanotubes by magnetite nanoparticles vol.43, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659617030051
  4. Efficient visible light magnetic modified iron oxide photocatalysts vol.43, pp.17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.193
  5. Antibacterial zinc oxide hybrid with gelatin coating vol.81, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.009
  6. Fabrication of Pd Nanoparticles Embedded C@Fe3O4Core–Shell Hybrid Nanospheres: An Efficient Catalyst for Cyanation in Aryl Halides vol.7, pp.41, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08875
  7. A study on the effect of chemically synthesized magnetite nanoparticles on earthworm: Eudrilus eugeniae vol.7, pp.1-2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-016-0542-y
  8. Immobilization and characterization of human carbonic anhydrase I on amine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles vol.57, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.03.025
  9. Synthesis of a Novel Magnetic Reusable Organocatalyst Based on 4-Dialkylaminopyridines for Acyl Transformations vol.1, pp.13, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201600824
  10. Nickel embedded on triazole-modified magnetic nanoparticles: A novel and sustainable heterogeneous catalyst for Hiyama reaction in fluoride-free condition 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2017.09.021
  11. Synthesis and characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles prepared hydrothermally at different reaction temperatures andpH vol.107, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3139/146.111417
  12. (111) vol.97, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.125304
  13. Ternary Blended Chitosan/Chitin/ $$\hbox {FE}_{3}\hbox {O}_{4}$$ FE 3 O 4 Nanosupport for Lipase Activation and Stabilization pp.2191-4281, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03771-4
  14. Physicochemical Characterization and Biocompatibility of SPION@Plasmonic @Chitosan Core-Shell Nanocomposite Biosynthesized from Fungus Species vol.2019, pp.1687-4129, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4024958