Political Diversity and Participation: A Systematic Review of the Measurement and Relationship

Jun, Najin

  • 발행 : 2014.02.28


This study reviews existing research on the measurement of and the relationship between political diversity and political participation. It addresses the inconsistency in the arguments of existing studies researching the influence of political diversity on political participation. It attempts to find the cause in the variety of approaches to conceptualize and operationalize the two variables. As the measure of political diversity, political network heterogeneity and network attributes are discussed in detail in specific relation to political participation. As for political participation, an in-depth analysis of various ways to understand different forms of political involvement is presented. Implications for public opinion research are discussed.


political diversity;political participation;political network heterogeneity;political discussion network;network attributes


  1. Jun, N. (2012). Contribution of Internet news use to reducing the influence of selective online exposure on political diversity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1450-1457.
  2. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  3. Kenny, C. B. (1994). The microenvironment of attitude change. Journal of Politics. 56(3), 715-728.
  4. Kwak, N., Willams, A. E., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics:An examination of the interactive relations between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research. 32(1), 87-111.
  5. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce.
  6. Leighley, J. (1990). Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation. American Politics Research, 18(4), 459-475.
  7. Lin, N. (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. McClurg, S. D. (2006a). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior. 28(4), 349-366.
  9. McClurg, S. D. (2006b). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737-754.
  10. McLeod, J. M., Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, D. M. (1994). The expanding boundaries of political communication effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 123-162). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  11. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
  12. Moy, P., & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443-460.
  13. Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838-855.
  14. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University.
  15. Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference. The American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97-114.
  16. Orum, A. M. (1976). Individual autonomy and social constraints in the political arena: Signs and designs in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, New York City.
  17. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Berger, C. R. (2009). Interpersonal communication. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  19. Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering ''difference'' in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680-700.
  20. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  21. Cambell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
  22. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hively, M. H. (2005). Political discussion frequency, network size and "heterogeneity" of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205-224.
  23. Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265-285.
  24. Gil de Zuniga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 387-421.
  25. Giles, M. W., & Dantico, M. K. (1982). Political participation and the neighborhood social context revisited. American Journal of Political Science, 26(1), 144-50.
  26. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
  27. Grosser, J., & Schram, A. (2006). Neighborhood information exchange and voter participation: An experimental study. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 235-248.
  28. Huckfeldt, R. (1979). Political participation and the neighborhood social context. American Journal of Political Science. 23(3), 579-92.
  29. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2002). Political environments, political dynamics, and the survival of disagreement. The Journal of Politics, 64(1), 1-21.
  30. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University.
  31. Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M. and Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65-95.
  32. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Jang, S. (2009). Are diverse political networks always bad for participatory democracy? Indifference, alienation, and political disagreements. American Politics Research, 37(5), 879-898.
  34. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impact of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315-338.
  35. Schmitt-Beck, R. (2004). Political communication effects: The impact of mass media and personal conversations on voting. In E. Esser, & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing Political communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges (pp. 293-322). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  36. Son, J., & Lin, N. (2008). Social capital and civic action: A network-based approach. Social Science Research, 37(1), 330-349.
  37. Stroud, N. J. (2007). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior. 30(3), 341-366.
  38. Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21(3), 265-282.
  39. Verva, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  40. Weismann, G. (1982). On the importance of marginality: One more step into the two-step flow of communication. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 764-773.
  41. Zipp, J. F., & Smith, J. (1979). The structure of electoral political participation. American Journal of Sociology. 85(1), 167-77.
  42. Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B.W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728-753.