Integrated survivability assessment given multiple penetration hits

다중 관통 피격에 따른 함정 통합 생존성 분석 절차

Kim, Kwang-Sik;Lee, Jang-Hyun

  • Received : 2013.08.13
  • Accepted : 2014.02.13
  • Published : 2014.02.28


Survivability assessments and vulnerability reductions are required in warship design. A warship's survivability is assessed by its susceptibility, vulnerability, and recoverability. In this paper, an integrated survivability assessment for a warship subjected to multiple hits is introduced. The methodology aims at integrating a survivability assessment into an early stage of warship design. The hull surface is idealized using typical geometries for RCS (Radar Cross Section) detection probability and susceptibility. The Vulnerability is evaluated by using the shot-line. The recoverability is estimated using a survival time analysis. This enables the variation of survivability to be assessed. Several parameters may be varied to determine their effects on the survivability. The susceptibility is assessed by the probability of detecting the radar cross section of the subject and the probability of being hit based on a probability density function. The vulnerability is assessed by the kill probability based on the vulnerable area of critical components, according to the component's layout and redundancy. Recoverability is assessed by the recovery time for damaged critical components.


Integrated Survivability;Susceptibility;Vulnerability;Recoverability


  1. Ball, R.E., 1985. The Fundamentals of Aircraft Combat Survivability Analysis and Design. 1st Edition, New York.
  2. Ball, R.E., 2003. The Fundamentals of Aircraft Combat Survivability Analysis and Design. 2nd Edition, New York.
  3. Ball, R.E., Calvano, C.N., 1994. Establishing the Fundamentals of a Surface Ship Survivability Design Discipline. Naval Engineers Journal, 106(1), 71-74.
  4. Cho, Y.J., 2009. A Study on Measuring Procedure and Analysis Technique of Ship Infrared Signature at Sea. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 23(3), 53-58.
  5. Chung, J.H., Kwon, J.I., 2008. Survivability Analysis of A Naval Ship Using the MOTISS Program(I): Theoretical Background. Proceedings of the Annual Autumn Meeting of Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Changwon Republic of Korea, 330-339.
  6. Driels, M., 2004. Weaponeering: Conventional Weapon System Effectiveness. AIAA Education Series, Virginia.
  7. Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H., Hwang, S.Y., 2011. Simplified Vulnerability Assessment Procedure for the Warship Based on the Vulnerable Area Approach. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 85(5), 404-413.
  8. Federal Aviation Administration(FAA), 2005. Advanced Aircraft Materials-Engine Debris Penetration Testing. Office of Aviation Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
  9. JTCG/ME, 1985. Penetration Equations Handbook for Kinetic-Energy Penetrators(U). Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness(Anti-Air), JTCG/ ME-77-16.
  10. Kim, K.H., Kim, J.H., Choi, T.M., Kim, Y.H., Cho, D.S., 2009. A Study on a Dynamic Radar Cross Section Analysis Technique for a Surface Warship. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 23(6), 77-81.
  11. Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H., 2012. Vulnerablility Assessment Procedure for the Warship Including the Effect of Shotline and Penetration of Fragments. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 49(3), 254-263.
  12. Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H., Son, G.J., Jhun, J.I., 2012. A Study of the Procedure for Integrated Survivability Assessment. Proceedings of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers Conference, Pyeongchang Republic of Korea, 824-840.
  13. Lapierrea, F.D., Marcel, J.P., Acheroy, M., 2007. Design of an Infrared Ship Signature Simulation Software for General Emissivity Orofiles. 2nd International IR Target Backgraound Modeling and Simulation Workshop Toulouse, France.
  14. Lillis, J.A., 2002. Analysis of the Applicability of Aircraft Vulnerability Assessment and Reduction Techniques to Small Surface Craft. Master's Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.
  15. Michael, O.K., 2002. Radar Systems, Peak Detection and Tracking. Oxford, Newnes.
  16. Otsin, N., 2005. Development of a Combat Aircraft Operation and Cost-Effectiveness Design Methodology. The degree of doctor, Granfield College of Aeronautics, Granfield University.
  17. Park, J.K., 2006. A Study of Establishing the Ship Susceptibility Design for Ship Survivability. The Degree of Master, Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Chung-Nam National University, Dae-Jeon.
  18. Pei, Y., Song, B., Han, Q., Ou, B., 2009. A Direct Simulation Method for Calculating Multiple-hit Vulnerability of Aircraft with Overlapping Components. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 22(1), 612-619.
  19. Shin, Y.H., Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.H., Sajdak, A.W., 2012. Development of Vulnerability Analysis Program for Review of Warship Survivability at Concept Design Stage, The 4th International Conference on Design and Anlaysis of Protective Structures, Jeju Republic of Korea, 151-162.
  20. Song, J.Y., Lee H.S., Jang, J.S., Jung, J.Y., Ha, S.D., 2005. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, Criticality Analysis. 1st Edition, Kyo-Woo-Sa, Seoul.