DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An analysis of Empirical Studies of Musical Literary Work Plagiarism Standard : The Popular Music

음악저작물 표절 기준에 관한 고찰 : 대중음악을 중심으로

  • Received : 2013.12.31
  • Accepted : 2014.01.24
  • Published : 2014.03.28

Abstract

This study deals with the precedents regarding music works among 'The suits to claim an infringement of copyright' and 'Suits to claim indemnification for damage' that have been filed in Korea up so far in order to establish clear criteria to judge plagiarism based on the ground of legal judgment and judge the similarity of two works that have been in controversy previously. The study has been performed through literature review and also precedents. According to the study result, 'criteria to judge music works on plagiarism' are largely classified into (1) creativity, (2) access, and (3) substantial similarity. It is almost the same to judge creativity and substantial similarity. With the components of music works, say, melody, harmony, and rhythm, comparative analysis is conducted. About creativity, the original composer's song is analyzed with another object to be compared whereas about substantial similarity, two songs in controversy get to be analyzed. Regarding the current criteria to judge creativity, it is needed to set the number of objects to be compared which have been regarded similar. And access has limitations in setting up objective criteria for it. Lastly, we should develop digitized criteria for substantial similarity based on the preliminary review system of the Committee on Performance Ethics in the past.

Keywords

Musical Literary Work;Plagiarism;Copyright;Infringement of Copyright

References

  1. C. Lepera and M. Manuelian, "Music Plagiarism: A framework for litigation," Entertainment and Sports Law, Vol.15, No.2, pp.27-38, 1997.
  2. 육소영, "지적재산권과 표현의 자유", 공법학연구, 제12권, 제4호, pp.231-254, 2011.
  3. 이재경, " '외톨이야' 사건 - 음악저작물 표절에 대한 판단 기준 : 서울중앙지방법원 2011. 4. 13. 선고 2010가단86875판결의 평석", 중앙법학, 제13권, 제4호, pp.339-370, 2011.
  4. 최현영, "표절 개념을 통해 본 대중음악 표절시비의 문제점", 계간 낭만음악, 제13권, 제3호, pp.311-329, 2001.
  5. Y. C. Kim and J. Y. Choi, "A Program Plagiarism Evaluation System," ICCSA 2005, Lecture Note of Computer Science 3483, 2005.
  6. 하동철, 음악 저작권, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2013.
  7. 한국문화콘텐츠진흥원, 문화콘텐츠 계약 매뉴얼, 한국문화콘텐츠진흥원, 2010.
  8. 한국저작권단체연합회, 2012 저작권보호 연차보고서, 한국저작권단체연합회, 2012.
  9. 대법원, 2010. 2. 11. 선고 2007다63409 판결
  10. 임우섭, 김진욱, "음악 표절에 관한 실무적 쟁점 : 대중가요를 중심으로", 문화.미디어.엔터테인먼트 법, 제6권, 제1호, pp.125-148, 2012.
  11. 정상조, 지적재산권법, 홍문사, 2004.
  12. 문화체육관광부, 음악표절 가이드 라인, 문화체육관광부, 2007.
  13. 이장직, "대중음악의 분석", 문학과 사회, 제5권, 제4호, p.1243, 1992.
  14. 수원지방법원 제6민사부, 2006. 10. 20. 판결, 사건2006가합8583 손해배상(기).
  15. 서울중앙지방법원, 2012. 2. 10, 2011가합70768 손해배상.
  16. 김수영, "표절과 올바른 인용 방법", 가정의학회지, 제29권, 제3호, pp.167-174, 2008.
  17. 김종보, "지적재산권 강화경향과 정보공유와의 관계에 대한 고찰 : 헌법이념상 저작권개념을 중심으로", 법학연구, 제46권, 제1호, pp.89-121, 2005.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단