DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Mathematical Structure and Formulation of Bottom-up Model based on Linear Programming

온실가스감축정책 평가를 위한 LP기반 상향식 모형의 수리 구조 및 정식화에 대한 연구

  • Received : 2014.09.17
  • Accepted : 2014.12.04
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Since the release of mid-term domestic GHG goals until 2020, in 2009, some various GHG reduction policies have been proposed. There are two types of modeling approaches for identifying options required to meet greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement targets and assessing their economic impacts: top-down and bottom-up models. Examples of the bottom-up optimization models include MARKAL, MESSAGE, LEAP, and AIM, all of which are developed based on linear programming (LP) with a few differences in user interface and database utilization. In this paper, we suggest a simplified LP formulation and how can build it through step-by-step procedures.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 경성대학교

References

  1. 국가온실가스 종합정보센터, "2020년 중기 국가 온실가스 감축목표설정", 2011.
  2. 녹색성장위원회, "그린카 발전전략 및 과제", 2010.
  3. 에너지경제연구원, "MARKAL 모형과 국내 장기 온실가스 감축잠재량 분석 보고서", 2009.
  4. 에너지경제연구원, "저탄소 경제시스템 구축 전략 연구 - 지역별 저탄소 경제시스템 개발", 2010.
  5. 유종훈, 김후곤, "손익분기점 분석을 이용한 전기차의 보조금 정책 연구", 에너지공학, 제20권 제1호, 2011.
  6. 유종훈, 김후곤, "MESSAGE 모델링을 이용한 승용차 부문의 그린카 도입 전망 분석", 에너지공학, 제21권 제1호, 2012.
  7. 지식경제부. "전기자동차산업 활성화방안", 2009.
  8. 한국산업환경기술원, "온실가스 배출 전망 및 감축잠재량 예측 분석 평가 기술 개발", 2011.
  9. 한국원자력 연구원, "MESSAGE 모형을 이용한 가정.상업.수송 부문 온실가스 감축잠재량 분석", 2010.
  10. EEA, CO2 Emissions Performance of Car Manufacturers in 2011, European Environment Agency (2011).
  11. EPA, Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Final Rule, Federal Register, 75(88), Environmental Protection Agency (2010).
  12. Fishbone, L.G., Abilock, H., MARKAL, a linear-programming model for energy systems analysis: technical description of the BNL version. Energy Res. 5(4), 353-75 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4440050406
  13. Fumo, B., Mago, P.J., Chamra, L.M., Emission operational strategy for combined cooling, heating, and power systems. Appl. Energy 86 (11), 2344-350 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.007
  14. Goldberg, K.P., The effects of the corporate average fuel efficiency standards in the U.S.. J. Ind. Econ. 46 (1), 1-3 (1998).
  15. Hashim, H., Douglas, P., Elkamel, A., Croiset, E., Optimization model for energy planning with CO2 emission considerations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (4), 879-90 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie049766o
  16. IPCC, IPCC Second Assessment Report: Climate Change 1995. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1995).
  17. IPCC, IPCC Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2001).