Effectiveness of Teaching Engineering in English with Specific Purpose

공학교육에 있어 특수목적 영어 교수법의 효과성

  • Received : 2014.03.14
  • Accepted : 2014.05.29
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study on the effectiveness of teaching an engineering course using English with Specific Purpose(ESP). A study was performed using student groups; one class using ESP, and one class conducted in English with an English text. The course conducted using ESP showed the greatest improvement in English writing and conversation, and the students reported a greatly increased confidence in their ability to function professionally using English. A self-assessment of each student was conducted before and after the courses. Prior to the course less than 10% in each group felt that they are able to: a) understand a textbook, b) write an email, c) generate a project report, or d) follow a lecture given in English. The survey at the end of the course showed that the ESP teaching style resulted in significant improvements in students ability and confidence with writing and speaking in English, whereas reading skills were similar for both groups. This is due to the ESP method, in which students are required to give presentations and keep journals in English. After a brief review of the ESP principles and a discussion of how they were implemented, the background data of the participants(students) are described. Finally, the end-of-semester survey highlights the efficacy of the ESP approach.

Keywords

Engineering Education;English with Specific Purpose;Confidence;Professional Communication;Engineering in English

References

  1. Anson, C. M., Bernold, L. Crossland, E C., Spurlin, J., McDemott, M. and Weiss, S. (2003). "Empowerment to Learn in Engineering: Preparation for an Urgently-Needed Paradigm Shift," Global J. Engrg. Educ, Vol. 7(2,) pp.145-155.
  2. Bernold, L.E. (2008). "Applying Total-Quality-Management Principles to Improving Engineering Edu.," J. Prof. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 134(1), pp. 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(33)
  3. Bernold, L.E., Spurlin J. and Anson Ch. M. (2006). Understanding our students: A longitudinal study of success and failure in engineering, J. Engineering Edu., ASEE, Vol. 96(3), pp. 263-274.
  4. Bernold, L.E. (2005). "A Paradigm Shift in Education is Vital for the Future of Our Profession," J. Constr. Eng. and Mgmt., ASCE, Vol. 131, No.5, April, pp. 535-542.
  5. Dudley-Evans, T. and John, St. M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  6. Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). An Overview of ESP in the 1990s, Proc. Japan Conf. on English for Specific Purposes, Fukushima, Japan, pp. 5-12.
  7. Hyland, L.K. (2002). "Specificity revisited: how far should we go now?" English for Specific Purposes, No.2, pp.385-395.
  8. Marginson, S. and McBurnie, G. (2004). "Cross-border postsecondary education in the Asia-Pacific region." Proc. OECD, Internationalisation and trade in higher education, Paris, pp.137-204.
  9. Palmer,S. R. (2000). Student Responses to Activities Designed to Develop Generic Professional Skills, J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract. 126(4), pp. 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2000)126:4(180)
  10. Radu, M.E. (2006). "Offering engineering degrees in a foreign language-preparing engineers for a global experience", Proc. Inter.Conf. on Engineering Edu., Puerto Rico.
  11. Savas, B. (2009). "Role of Functional Academic Literacy in ESP Teaching: ESP Teacher Training in Turkey for Sustainable Development." J. Inter. Social Research, Vol. 2(9), pp. 395-406.
  12. Weinstein, C.E. (1987). LASSI User's Manual, H and H Publishing Company, Inc., Clearwater, Florida, US.
  13. Widdowson, H.G., (1978). Teaching Language as Communication, Oxford University Press, London, England.