Guidance Law for Near Space Interceptor based on Block Backstepping Sliding Mode and Extended State Observer

• Guo, Chao (School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
• Liang, Xiao-Geng (Luoyang Optoelectro Technology Development Center)
• Accepted : 2014.05.19
• Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel guidance law based on the block backstepping sliding mode control and extended state observer (ESO), which also takes into account the autopilot dynamic characteristics of the near space interceptor (NSI), and the impact angle constraint of attacking the maneuvering target. Based on the backstepping control approach, the target maneuvers and the parameter uncertainties of the autopilot are regarded as disturbances of the outer loop and inner loop, respectively. Then, the ESO is constructed to estimate the target acceleration and the inner loop disturbance, and the block backstepping sliding model guidance law is employed, based on the estimated disturbance value. Furthermore, in order to avoid the "explosion of complexity" problem, first-order low-pass filters are also introduced, to obtain differentiations of the virtual control variables. The stability of the closed-loop guidance system is also proven, based on the Lyapunov theory. Finally, simulation results demonstrate that the proposed guidance law can not only overcome the influence of the autopilot dynamic delay and target maneuvers, but also obtain a small miss distance.

References

1. Han, J., Active disturbance rejection control technique--the technique for estimating and compensating the uncertainties, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2008.
2. Qu, P., and Zhou, D., "A dimension reduction observerbased guidance law accounting for dynamics of missile autopilot", Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 227, No. 7, 2013, pp. 1114-1121.
3. Sun, S., Zhang, H., and Zhou, D., "Sliding mode guidance law with autopilot lag for terminal angle constrained trajectories", Journal of Astronautics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2013, pp. 69-78.
4. Zhang, Z., Li, S., and Luo, S., "Terminal guidance laws of missile based on ISMC and NDOB with impact angle constraint", Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2013, pp. 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2013.09.003
5. Hou, M., Liang, X., and Duan, G., "Adaptive block dynamic surface control for integrated missile guidance and autopilot", Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2013, pp. 741-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2013.04.035
6. Swaroop, D., Hedrick, J., and Yip, P., et al., "Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 45, No. 10, 2000, pp. 1893-1899. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2000.880994
7. Yang, C., and Chen, H., "Nonlinear $H{\infty}$ guidance law for homing missiles", AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1998, pp. 882-890. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4321
8. Chen, B., Chen, Y., and Lin, C., "Nonlinear fuzzy $H{\infty}$ guidance law with saturation of actuators against maneuvering targets", IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2002, pp. 769-779. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2002.804122
9. Zhou, D., Sun, S., and Teo, K., "Guidance laws with finite time convergence", AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1838-1846. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42976
10. Zhou, D., New guidance laws for homing missile, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2002.
11. Li, S., Yang, J., and Chen, W., et al., "Generalized extended state observer based control for systems with mismatched uncertainties", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 59, No. 12, 2012, pp. 4792- 4892. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2011.2182011
12. Liu, H., and Li, S., "Speed control for PMSM servo system using predictive functional control and extended state observer", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2012, pp. 1171- 1183. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2011.2162217
13. Xia, Y., and Fu, M., Compound control methodology for flight vehicles, Springer Science Business Media, Berlin, 2013.
14. Dai, J., Cheng, J., and Guo, R., "Research on nearspace hypersonic weapon defense system and the key technology", Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2010, pp. 58-61.
15. Zarchan, P., Tactical and strategic missile guidance, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2012.
16. Siouris, G., Missile guidance and control systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
17. Zhang, Z., Li, S., and Luo, S., "Composite guidance laws based on sliding mode control with impact angle constraint and autopilot lag", Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2013, pp. 764-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331213478327

Cited by

1. Cooperative Guidance Law for Multiple Near Space Interceptors with Impact Time Control vol.15, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5139/IJASS.2014.15.3.281
2. Active disturbance rejection control based robust output feedback autopilot design for airbreathing hypersonic vehicles 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2018.01.002
3. Robust state-constrained control design for nonlinear systems with uncertainties using a new barrier Lyapunov function 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331217722599
4. Robust constrained autopilot control for a generic missile in the presence of state and input constraints vol.149, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.09.026
5. Impact-angle-constrained reentry guidance law guaranteeing convergence before attainment of desired line-of-sight range pp.2041-3025, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410018786036