DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Project Experience and its Impact on Project Performance

프로젝트 경험이 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2014.06.23
  • Accepted : 2014.08.11
  • Published : 2014.08.28

Abstract

The assignment of exploration on individuals provides challenging work environments, while it generates high levels of complexity. On the other hand, the assignment of exploitation on individuals offers less challenging work environments, while it makes low levels of complexity. Give the characteristics of exploration and exploitation, I argue that the assignments of both exploration and exploitation create the favorable work environments to individuals. Developed hypotheses were tested using a logit regression from a sample of 168 project managers in a R&D center. I found that a manager who experienced exploitation project(s) is positively related to higher performance in exploitation project(s). In addition, a manager who experienced both exploitation and exploration projects are found to be positively associated with higher project performance.

Keywords

Exploration and Exploitation;R&D Management;Project Performance

References

  1. R. A. Burgelman, "Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.47, No.2, pp.325-357, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094808
  2. D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, "The Myopia of Learning," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, pp.95-112, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
  3. J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning," Organization Science, Vol.2, No.1, pp.71-87, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  4. S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt, "Product development - Past research, present findings, and future directions," Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, No.2, pp.343-378, 1995.
  5. G. Probst and S. Raisch, "Organizational crisis: The logic of failure," Academy of Management Executive, Vol.19, No.1, pp.90-105, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2005.16963629
  6. H. W. Volberda, "Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments," Organization Science, Vol.7, No.4, pp.359-374, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.4.359
  7. T. Burns and G. M. Stalker, Mechanistic and organic systems of management. In T. Burns & G.M. Stalker (Eds.), The management of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.96-125, 1961.
  8. M. L. Tushman and P. Anderson, Technological discontinuities and organizational environments," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.31, No.3, pp.439-465, 1986. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832
  9. P. E. Tesluk and R. R. Jacobs, "Toward an integrated model of work experience," Personnel Psychology, Vol.51, No.2, pp.321-355, 1988.
  10. M. Hoegl and H. G. Gemueden, "Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence," Organization Science, Vol.12, No.4, pp.435-449, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
  11. E. Danneels, "The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.23, No.12, pp.1095-1121, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.275
  12. S. C. Kang and S. Snell, "Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management," Journal of Management Studies Vol.46, No.1, pp.65-92, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x
  13. L. A. Burke and H. K. Steensma, "Toward a model for relating executive career experiences and firm performance," Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol.10, pp.86-102, 1998.
  14. A. Taylor and A. Greve. "Superman or the fantastic four: Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.49, No.4, pp.723-740, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083029
  15. J. S. Brown and P. Duguid, "Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Towards a Unified View of Working, Learning and Organization," Organization Science, Vol.2, No.1, pp.40-57, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
  16. D. Dougherty, "A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation," Strategic Managemnent Journal, Summer Special Issue, Vol.13, pp.77-92, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131007
  17. J. R. Hackman and G. Oldham, Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
  18. C. Perrow, "A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations," American Sociological Review, Vol.32 (April), pp.194-208, 1967. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091811
  19. D. C. Maynard and M. D. Hakel, "Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance, Human Performance, Vol.10, No.4, pp.303-330, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1004_1
  20. J. F. Hair, R. Jr., Anderson, and W. C. Tatham, Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1998.
  21. T. J. M. Mom, F. A. J. van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms," Organization Science, Vol.20, No.4, pp.812-828, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0427
  22. D. Lavie, U. Stettner, and M.L. Tushman, "Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations," The Academy of Management Annals, Vol.4, No.1, pp.109-155, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003691287