DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consolidation of Protection for Lessees by Improvement of Opposing Power System of the Unregistered Housing Leases

미등기 주택임대차의 대항력 관련 제도개선을 통한 임차인보호 강화

  • 노한장 (국민연금공단, 단국대학교 부동산건설대학원)
  • Received : 2014.06.23
  • Accepted : 2014.08.11
  • Published : 2014.08.28

Abstract

According to the Housing Lease Protection Act, even though it is not registered, if the lessee has completed delivery of a house and the resident registration, the lease shall take effect against the third person from the following day thereof. Any lessee who has met the requirements for opposing power and obtained the fixed date on the lease contract document, shall be entitled to receive the repayment of the deposit from the converted price of the leased house, in preference to any junior obligors and other creditors, at the time of an auction as provided by the Civil Execution Act and a public sale as prescribed by the National Tax Collection Act. The lessee shall be entitled to receive a repayment of a specified amount of the deposit in preference to other persons having the security rights in the leased house. However those provisions give rise to many problems because the Housing Lease Protection Act allows the opposing power and the right of preferential payment from the following date of fulfillment of the requirement. For the purpose of solving the problems, this study suggests that the Housing Lease Protection Act need to be amended as follows. The fixed date should be added to the requirement of opposing power and the preferential right of specified deposit repayment. In addition, the commencement of opposing power and preferential right of deposit repayment need to be taken effect from the day that the requirement is fulfilled.

Keywords

Housing Lease;Opposing Power;Right of Preferential Repayment;Fixed Date

References

  1. 편집대표 곽윤직, 민법주해[XV], 박영사, 2009.
  2. Burgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der justiz und fur Verbraucherschutz
  3. http://nland.kbstar.com/.
  4. 김성욱, "주택임차인의 대항요건과 관련한 비교 법적 고찰", 법학연구, 제44집, pp.39-57, 2011.
  5. 장민, 허명국, 임대차 법제의 비교법적 고찰, 법무부 연구용역보고서, 2010.
  6. http://world.moleg.go.kr/World/WesternEurope/
  7. http://www.uniformlaws.org/
  8. 노한장, 유정석, "부동산 경매에 있어서 유치권의 우선변제권 인정 및 대항력 제한", 부동산학보, 제52집, p.98, 2013.
  9. C. W. Sullivan, "Forgotten Lessons From The Common Law, The Uniform Residential Landlord And Tenant Act, And The Holdover Tenant," Washington University Law Review, Vol.84, pp.1311-1315, 2006.
  10. 김성욱, 박영준, 보증금 보험제도 등 주택임대차제도 개선방안, 법무부 연구용역보고서, 2011.
  11. 김준호, 민법강의, 박영사, 2013.
  12. 대한민국 법원행정처, 대법원예규집 : 송무편, 법원행정처, 1992.
  13. 고상룡, "임차권과 주민등록상의 공시방법", 법률신문, 제2421호, p.14, 1995.07.10.
  14. 고상룡, "임차권과 주민등록상의 공시방법", 법률신문, 제2421호, p.15, 1995.07.10.
  15. 박종렬, "부동산 경매에 있어 유치권 신고의무", 한국콘텐츠학회, 제11권, 제2호, pp.408-409, 2011.
  16. 박종렬, "부동산 이중매매와 그 예방", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제9권, 제7호, pp.328-330, 2009.
  17. http://www.iros.go.kr/re1/
  18. 미래창조과학부, "미래부, 'ICT산업 경쟁력 강화를 위한 법․제도개선 추진", 보도자료, 2014,5,8.