DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Treatment of retrograde peri-implantitis: seven-year follow-up study

역행성 임플란트 근단병소 주위염(Retrograde Peri-implantitis) 치료의 7년 관찰

  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실)
  • Received : 2014.04.10
  • Accepted : 2014.08.10
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

Retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) is defined as a clinically symptomatic periapical lesion. RPI is generally accompanied by symptoms of pain, tenderness, swelling and fistula. Several etiologic factors of RPI were possible, residual bacteria would be the main cause of RPI. Various treatment modalities have been introduced: debridement only or a combination of debridement with the grafting material accompanied by a detoxification of the infected implant surfaces, apicoectomy and so on. Although the definitive management methods remain undefined, many favorable clinical results of a treatment of RPI have been published. This case report introduces the 7-year long-term clinical result of the application the principle: implant surface detoxification using saline and chlorhexidine and guided bone regeneration with bone graft material and barrier membrane. If the implant was not mobile, it would be possible to treat RPI according to surgical approach and good results will be maintained over long term.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 부산대학교

References

  1. Quirynen M, Gijbels F, Jacobs R. An infected jawbone site compromising successful osseointegration. Periodontol 2000 2003;33:129-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03311.x
  2. Reiser GM, Nevins M. The implant periapical lesion: etiology, prevention, and treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16:768, 770, 772 passim.
  3. Dahlin C, Nikfarid H, Alsen B, Kashani H. Apical peri-implantitis: possible predisposing factors, case reports, and surgical treatment suggestions. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:222-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00108.x
  4. Ayangco L, Sheridan PJ. Development and treatment of retrograde peri-implantitis involving a site with a history of failed endodontic and apicoectomy procedures: a series of reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:412-7.
  5. Quirynen M, Vogels R, Alsaadi G, Naert I, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Predisposing conditions for retrograde peri-implantitis, and treatment suggestions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:599-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01147.x
  6. Lin S, Mayer Y. Treatment of a large periradicular lesion of endodontic origin around a dental implant with enamel matrix protein derivative. J Periodontol 2007;78:2385-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070199
  7. Flanagan D. Apical (retrograde) peri-implantitis: a case report of an active lesion. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:92-6. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0092:ARPACR>2.3.CO;2
  8. Chan HL, Wang HL, Bashutski JD, Edwards PC, Fu JH, Oh TJ. Retrograde peri-implantitis: a case report introducing an approach to its management. J Periodontol 2011;82:1080-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100585
  9. Green TL, Walton RE, Taylor JK, Merrell P. Radiographic and histologic periapical findings of root canal treated teeth in cadaver. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:707-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90324-3
  10. van der Stelt PF. Experimentally produced bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59:306-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(85)90172-0
  11. Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:682-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.118904
  12. Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 1976;47:256-60. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.5.256
  13. Zablotsky MH, Diedrich DL, Meffert RM. Detoxification of endotoxin-contaminated titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces utilizing various chemotherapeutic and mechanical modalities. Implant Dent 1992;1:154-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199205000-00009
  14. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Tamse A, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011;37:1039-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.016
  15. Mailoa J, Lin GH, Chan HL, MacEachern M, Wang HL. Clinical outcomes of using lasers for peri-implantitis surface detoxification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2014;85:1194-202. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.130620
  16. Park JB. Treatment of peri-implantitis with deproteinised bovine bone and tetracycline: a case report. Gerodontology 2012;29:145-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00470.x
  17. Claffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I, Renvert S. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:316-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01277.x
  18. Schou S, Holmstrup P, Jorgensen T, Skovgaard LT, Stoltze K, Hjorting-Hansen E, Wenzel A. Implant surface preparation in the surgical treatment of experimental peri-implantitis with autogenous bone graft and ePTFE membrane in cynomolgus monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:412-22. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00912.x