DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficiency Test for Surface Protecting Agents for the Chemical Resistance of Concrete Structures Using Sulfur Polymers

Sulfur Polymer를 사용한 콘크리트 구조물용 내화학성 표면보호재의 성능 평가

  • Received : 2014.04.02
  • Accepted : 2014.04.30
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

Structures requiring chemical resistance are usually coated with surface protecting agents, but the cost for maintenance and re-construction is incurred due to the low durability. Therefore, in this study, sulfur was polymerized and the performance was examined so that it could be used as the concrete surface protecting agents for structures requiring chemical resistance. The evaluation results indicated that for the spray of the sulfur polymer surface coating agents, the application of the gravity type was appropriate; and for the number of coating times, about 3 cycle spray gave the best results. For the surface condition of the concrete to be coated with the surface protecting agents, outstanding quality was obtained above room temperature ($20{\sim}30^{\circ}C$), and the bond strength increased as the temperature increased. The evaluation results of the strength characteristics depending on the filler content of the surface protecting agents indicated that about 20~40% filler mixing contributed to the strength improvement as it reduced the shrinkage of the sulfur polymer. Also, the mixing of silica showed larger increase in the bond strength than the mixing of fly ash, and the most outstanding bond strength characteristics could be obtained by the mixing of both silica and fly ash. In the case of the chemical resistance, the strength reduction was minimized and outstanding chemical resistance was obtained when the fly ash and silica were substituted by 20%, respectively. The performance evaluation of the chloride ion penetration indicated that for the specimens coated with the sulfur polymer surface protecting agents, the chloride ion penetration resistance increased by 29~48% compared to the specimen without the coating of the surface protecting agent. The examination of the coating condition of the surface protecting agents, compressive strength, bond strength, chemical resistance, and salt damage resistance indicated that in the range of this study, the optimal level was when the silica and fly ash were substituted by 20%, respectively, as the filler for the sulfur polymer.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : (주)태영건설

References

  1. Guide for mixing and placing sulfur concrete in construction (1993), Report 548.2R-93, ACI Committee 548 (American Concrete Institute), Farmington Hills, MI.
  2. Mariusz Ksiazek (2013), The intensity of corrosion processes influenced by tensile stress for reinforcing steel covered with sulphur polymer composite applied as industrial waste material, Composites Part B: Engineering, 45(1), 1126-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.072
  3. Milica M. Vlahovic, Predrag B. Jovanic, Sanja P. Martinovic, Tamara D. Boljanac, Tatjana D. Volkov-Husovic (2013), Quantitative evaluation of sulfur-polymer matrix composite quality, Composites Part B: Engineering, 44(1), 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.005
  4. Milica M. Vlahovic, Sanja P. Martinovic, Tamara Dj. Boljanac, Predrag B. Jovanic, Tatjana D. Volkov-Husovic (2011), Durability of sulfur concrete in various aggressive environments, Construction and Building Materials, 25(10), 3926-3934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.024
  5. Ministry of knowledge economy (2012), Supply and demand situation of mineral produce in 2011, Korea institute of geoscience and mineral resources, 119-120.
  6. Mohamed AMO (2010), El Gamal MM. Sulfur concrete for the construction industry - A sustainable development approach. J. Ross Publishing.

Cited by

  1. Strength Development of Sulfur-Polymer-Based Concrete Surface Protecting Agents Depending on Curing Condition and Hazard Assessment of Sulfur Polymers vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2015.19.1.139