DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Disaster Handling through Volunteering and Charitable Donation: The Roles of South Korean Telethon, Involvement, and Collective-Efficacy

  • Jin, Bumsub (School of Advertising and Public Relations Hongik University)
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

This study examined whether South Koreans' philanthropic behaviors were related to the factors of two theoretical frameworks. From the involvement perspective, the study argued that three types of involvement with a telethon may be linked to volunteering and charitable donation behaviors. At the collective level, collective-efficacy may also be related to such behaviors. The study asked 279 South Koreans to respond to a Web survey that used convenience sampling. Results found that after controlling for demographics and past volunteer experiences, cognitive and behavioral involvement and collective-efficacy were positively related to volunteering behaviors, but affective involvement was not related. Moreover, only behavioral involvement and collective-efficacy were positively related to charitable donation. These results suggest that researchers and practitioners for volunteering resources need to use effective programs and contents for such behaviors in order to enhance involvement and level of collective-efficacy among community members in times of disaster.

References

  1. Aldoory, L. (2001). Making health communications meaningful for women: Factors that influence involvement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(2), 163-185.
  2. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective-efficacy. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
  4. Bortree, D.S. (2011). Mediating the power of antecedents in public relationships: A pilot study. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.002
  5. Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. N.Y.: Holt, Rineharl & Winston.
  6. Heath, R. L., & Douglas, W. (1990). Involvement: A key variable in people's reaction to public policy issues. In J. E. Grunig, & L. A. Grunig (Eds.), Public relations research annual (pp. 193-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  7. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973-1974). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.
  8. Kelly, K. S. (1998). Effective fund-raising management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Jin, B. & Lee, S. (2012). The determinants of blood donation behavior in health promotion campaigns: Focusing on the effect of celebrity identification in the U.S. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 23(7), 135-154.
  10. Jin, B. & Lubbers, C. (2006). Integrative theory and collective efficacy as predictors of intention to participate in a campus nonviolence campaign. Business Research Yearbook, 13, 400-404.
  11. Kim, B.-C., Choi, M., & Kim, Y.-M. (2012). The influence of audience involvement in TV donation program on donation intention: The mediated effects of the perceived behavioral control, moral norm, and altruism. Journal of Media Economics & Culture, 10(3), 48-88.
  12. McGuire, J. K., & Gamble, W. C. (2006). Community service for youth: The value of psychological engagement over number of hours spent. Journal of Adolescence, 29(2), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.07.006
  13. Papa, M., Singhal, A., Law, S., Pant, S., Sood, S., Rogers, E., & Shefner-Rogers, C. (2000). Entertainment-education and social change: an analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 31-55.
  14. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
  15. Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 525-548). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
  16. Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(2), 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
  17. Silverman, W. K., Robertson, S. J., Middlebrook, S. J., & Frabman, R. S. (1984). An investigation of pledging behavior to a national charitable telethon. Behavior Therapy, 15, 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(84)80033-7
  18. Sood, S. (2002). Audience involvement and entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12(2), 153 - 172.
  19. Statistics Korea & Eurostat European Commission (SK & ES) (2012). The European Union and the Republic of Korea: A statistical portrait. European Union. Retrieved April 1, 2012, from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-32-11-816/EN/KS-32-11-816-EN.PDF

Cited by

  1. How Do South Koreans Perceive Corporate Social Capital and Its Benefits? An Application to Corporations and Community vol.3, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2015.3.1.1