DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Reminding Words Evaluation Method for Icon Design

연상단어 평가를 통한 아이콘 디자인 연구

  • Received : 2014.06.03
  • Accepted : 2014.07.11
  • Published : 2014.10.28

Abstract

As the importance of interface became emphasized recently, function of icon as an element that helps operation and formative function as an aesthetic element are becoming emphasized. Specially, various research methodologies for measuring the understanding degree of users are being attempted in functional aspect, however, they are facing limitations as user evaluation method of quantitative investigation for statistical analysis became overly dependent on the consent from majority. To overcome such limitation, a methodology of measuring sensibility as aesthetic impression or individuality based on the system of emotion or system of understanding of users and designing icon based on the measurement is being attempted continuously. Therefore, this study suggested an evaluation method using reminding words and conducted an empirical study to apply results on the icon design by applying the evaluation method on icon design of printing products to measure the user sensibility and understanding level. Through this process, this study intended to research summaries on the design evaluation method which based on the evaluation of user sensibility and understanding level and to debate effective design methodologies through the process of applying these summaries on the project. The intention was to progress discussion from practical application perspectives apart from the textbook type discussion by applying a research methodology through concrete cases. This study objectified sensibility and understanding level of users in the icon design aspect, suggested a methodology that can be applied on the design, and it is expected to be used when progressing the icon and GUI design.

Keywords

Icon Design;Evaluation;Reminding Word;User Value;User Experience

References

  1. 김진우, Human Computer Interaction 개론; 사람과 컴퓨터의 어울림, 안그라픽스, p.504, 2007.
  2. 제프 래스킨, Humane interface; 인간 중심 인터 페이스, 안그라픽스, p.217, 2003.
  3. 김수희, "메타포와 메트로 아이콘 형태의 비교 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 2013 춘계종합학술대회, p.63, 2013(5).
  4. K. M. Lodding, "Iconic Interfacing," IEEE Computer Graphics & Application, Vol.3, No.2, p.11, 1983.
  5. 제프 래스킨, Humane interface; 인간 중심 인터 페이스, 안그라픽스, p.218, 2003.
  6. ISO/IEC, 9241-11 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT)s - Part 11 Guidance on usability, 1998: ISO/IEC 9241-11: 1998(E).
  7. Carol M. Barnum and A. Palmer Laura, "More Than a Feeling: Understanding the Desirability Factor in User experience," Proceedings of CHI 2010, p.4704, 2010.
  8. K. Hornbeak, "Current practice in mesauring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research," International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, Vol.64, p.79, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002
  9. International Standard, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), PartII; Guidance on usability, ISO9241-11, p.10, 1998.
  10. Michael Hawley, "Rapid Desirability Testing: A Case Study," 2010, http://www.uxmatters.com
  11. 벨라 마틴, 브루스 해닝턴, 디자인 방법론 불변의 법칙 100가지, 고려문화사, p.186, 2013.
  12. JThomas S. Tullis and Jacqueline N. Stetson, "A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability," UPA 2004 Presentation, 2004.
  13. Joey Benedek and Trish Miner "Measuring Desirability: New methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting," Proceedings of UPA 2002 Conference, Orlando, FL, 2002(7).
  14. 벨라 마틴, 브루스 해닝턴, 디자인 방법론 불변의 법칙 100가지, 고려문화사, p.64, 2013.
  15. 전성복, 정수연, "메타포어 아이콘의 인지현황과 인지향상 방안에 관한 연구;웹사이트에서 행해지는 아이콘 인지를 중심으로", 디자인학연구, 통권 제52권, Vol.16, No.2, pp.77-86, 2003.
  16. 하광수, "복사기 조작버튼에 따른 사용성 상관관계 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제13권, 제12호, p.596, 2003. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.12.595
  17. Michael Hawley, "Rapid Desirability Testing: A Case Study," 2010, http://www.uxmatters.com
  18. 일본인간공학회 스크린 디자인 연구회, graphic user interface; GUI 디자인 가이드, 안그라픽스, p.124, 2003.