Local Government Fiscal Consolidation Measures-Focusing on Cheonan-

지방정부 재정건전화 방안-천안시를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2014.08.21
  • Accepted : 2014.09.22
  • Published : 2014.10.28


This Study aims to establish better sound fiscal plan by investigating perception of local government officials. Local government fiscal consolidation is affected by a combination of factors, including social, economic, demographic, political financial health of local governments. We derived the financial situation of the government-related indicators, financial health-related indicators, the indicators to improve the financial health on the basis of this study are an existing discussion. To ensure the financial soundness of the Cheonan, it is necessary to increase the efficiency of financial management including financial monitoring and control devices provided the locals, investment screening analysis system to enable it. In addition, fiscal controls should be strengthened in order to effectively autonomous government debt management. You must cuts expense of local government to prepare for expansion of local government finance, it is necessary to realize that the fee rates. It should be made through a blend of autonomy and control in the central government, network of local government and the development of local financial operations. You should also to be distributed to the residents welfare and community development funds are invested substantially to establish a systematic planning, resource allocation, evaluation, and reflux system.


Local Government;Decentralization;Fiscal Consolidation;Autonomy


Supported by : 백석대학교


  1. 윤성식, 현승현, "지방교부세 법정세율변화에 따른 재정지출 효가와 건전성 분석", 지방자치학회보, 제18권, 제3호, pp.53-75, 2006.
  2. 변준혁, 지방재정 인센티브제도가 지방재정에 미치는 영향 분석: 건전성과 효율성을 중심으로, 성균관대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문, 2004.
  3. 고성철, 이승우, 지방재정조정제도 운영현황에 대한 분석: 기초지방자치단체 예산의 자주성과 건전성 측면을 중심으로, 한국지방행정연구원, 2003.
  4. 최영수, 지방재정 건전성 제고방안에 관한 연구, 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위, 2004.
  5. 김종순, 지방자치와 행정, 삼영사, 1995.
  6. H. Bohn and R. Inman, Balanced-budget Rules and Public Deficits: Evidence from the U.S. States, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, No.45, pp.13-76, 1996.
  7. A. Alesiana and T. Bayoumi, The Costs and Benefits of Fiscal Rules: Evidence from U.S. States, NEER Working Papers 5614, 1996.
  8. R. Perotti and Y. Kontopoulos "Fragmented Fiscal Policy," Journal of Public Economics, Vol.86, No.2, pp.191-222, 2002.
  9. M. Hallerberg and J. von Hagen, Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits in the European Union. Poterba and von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, NBER and Universiη of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.265, 1999.
  10. 임성일, 지방재정의 건전성 제고방안, 한국지방행정연구원, 2002.
  11. 라휘문, 이상용, "국세와 지방세의 효율적 재배분 방안", 제5회 지역발전포럼 발표논문집: pp.131-157, 2003.
  12. 배인명, 지방자치시대의 중앙과 지방의 합리적 재원배분, 21세기를 여는 민선2기 지방, 1998.
  13. 박종관, "주민참여예산제의 활성화 방안", 공공행정연구, 제14권, 제2호, 2013.
  14. 박종관, "지역갈등해소를 위한 사회자본 형성방안-천안시를 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제13권, 제11호, 2013.