DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

English Writing Strategies of Korean Students: Exploring Written Texts and Interviews with the Teacher

한국 학생들의 영작문 전략: 텍스트 분석과 교사와의 인터뷰를 중심으로

  • 이영화 (선문대학교 영어학과) ;
  • 김선재 (배재대학교 전자상거래학과)
  • Received : 2014.09.15
  • Accepted : 2014.10.13
  • Published : 2014.10.28

Abstract

This study aims at investigating Korean EFL students' writing strategies through their rhetorical patterns and meaning-making for a writing task in an English writing classroom at a Korean university. The participants were the students and teacher in the course, and the data comprised nine pieces of students' opinion writing and interviews with the teacher. To analyze the data, a 'Claim-Support' pattern was adopted. The findings show that most students, 89%, demonstrated the same or similar elements in the 'Claim-Support' pattern for their textual structures and many parts of the meaning-making in their writing were originated from the textbook. These findings reflect that the students pursued the strategy of 'accommodation' in order to succeed in their academic writing regardless of the teacher's intention which focused on creativity and imagination in writing. The conclusion suggest that the students tend to establish their own ways of strategy to cope with the recontextualized setting for writing in English.

Keywords

Writing Strategies;Rhetorical Patterns;Meaning-making;Claim-Support Pattern;Accommodation

References

  1. C. Yang, "How Chinese beginning writers learn English writing: A study of writing strategies," Journal of Educational and Social Research, Vol.3, No.1, pp.9-18, 2013.
  2. Y. Lee, Alignments and detachments in writing pedagogy: Interface between teachers' practices and students' purposes in two EFL writing courses in Korea, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University, UK, 2003.
  3. C. Mu, "A taxonomy of ESL writing strategies," Redesigning pedagogy: Research, policy, practice, May 30-June Vol.1, pp.1-10, 2005.
  4. W. Grabe and R. B. Kaplan, Theory and Practice of writing, London, Addison Wesley, 1996.
  5. A. Okamura, "Two types of strategies used by Japanese scientists, when writing research articles in English," System, Vol.34, pp.68-79, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.03.006
  6. X. Lei, "Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities," Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.17, pp.219-236, 2008.
  7. M. Ridhuan, A. Zulqarnain, and M. Razol, "Writing strategies of Malaysian ESL undergraduate engineering learners," International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol.11, No.2, pp.1-9, 2011.
  8. M. E. Mastan and N. Maarof, "ESL learners' self-efficacy beliefs and strategy use in expository writing," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.116, pp.2360-2363, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.573
  9. R. Lan and R. L. Oxford, "Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan," International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Vol.41, pp.339-379, 2003.
  10. G. Fulcher, "Assessing writing," In Fulcher, G. (Ed.), Writing in the English language classroom, pp.45-67, 1996.
  11. A. Pollitt and C. Hutchinson, "Calibrating graded assessments: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writing," Language Testing, Vol.4, No.1, pp.72-92, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400107
  12. J. Brown, T. Hilgers, and J. Marsella, "Essay prompts and topics: Minimizing the effect of mean differences," Written Communication, Vol.8, No.4, pp.533-556, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088391008004005
  13. B. Huot, "Toward a new theory of writing assessment," College Composition and Communication, Vol.47, No.4, pp.549-566, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/358601
  14. D. Barton and N. Hall, Letter writing as a social practice, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000.
  15. M. Halliday, Spoken and written language, Victoria: Deakin University Press, 1994.
  16. T. Hutchinson and A. Waters, English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  17. M. Hoey, Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis, London: Routledge, 2001.
  18. N. Prabhu, "The dynamics of the language lesson," TESOL Quarterly, Vol.26, No.2, pp.225-241, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587004
  19. A. Ferdosipour and A. Delavar, "The effects of rhetorical patterns or schemata on reading comprehension in expository text of Persian," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.30, pp.690-693, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.133
  20. A. Hogue, First steps in academic writing, New York: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
  21. M. Lea, "Academic literacies and learning in higher education: Constructing knowledge through texts and experience," Studies in the Education of Adults, Vol.30, No.2, pp.156-171, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.1998.11730680
  22. Y. Lee, "Accommodation for success: Korean EFL students' writing practices in personal opinion writing," In Carter, A., Lillis, T. and Parkin, S. (Eds.), Why writing matters: Issues of access and identity in writing research and pedagogy, pp.111-126, 2009.
  23. S. Kim, Y. H. Lee, and K. H. Im, "The relationships between educational investment as a human capital formation and the national economic growth: Focusing on non-English-speaking OECD countries," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.10, No.3, pp.315-325, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.3.315
  24. S. Kim and Y. H. Lee, "The relationships between English language proficiency and the national economic performance: Focusing on non-English-speaking OECD countries," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.11, No.1, pp.329-339, 2011.