DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determinants of Eco-friendly Outdoor Wear Products Purchase Intention : Exploring Value-Belief-Norm Theory

친환경 아웃도어 웨어 제품 구매의도 결정요인 : 가치-신념-규범 이론을 중심으로

Kim, Young Hwa;Oh, Kyung Wha;Jung, Hye Jung
김영화;오경화;정혜정

  • Received : 2015.09.30
  • Accepted : 2015.12.10
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

This study aims to investigate determinants that included personal values, pro-environmental beliefs, and proenvironmental norms for enhancing consumers' purchase intention of eco-friendly outdoor wear exploring Stern(2000)’s the value-belief-norm theory. A survey was conducted with females and males between the ages of 20 and 60 who have experienced buying outdoor wear products. A total of 300 responses were analyzed by descriptive analysis, factor analysis, a reliability test, an independent samples t-test, and regression analysis. The results of this study were as follows: 1) The results of exploratory factor analysis and reliability test on the personal value clearly showed factorial structures including the social power, ecologic value, openness, equality, and altruistic value. 2) There are significant differences in personal value sub-dimensions, pro-environmental beliefs, pro-environmental norm, and purchase intention of eco-friendly outdoor wear products according to respondents' gender and age. 3) Personal values, but not social power, affect pro-environmental beliefs; in turn, pro-environmental beliefs affect pro-environmental norms, which then affects purchase intentions of eco-friendly outdoor wear. The findings support the conclusion that there is significant causality among personal value such as ecologic, openness, equality, and altruistic, pro-environmental belief, and pro-environmental norm. This study suggests pragmatic implications to understand outdoor wear consumers' socio-psychological and demographic factors and to augment purchase intentions of eco-friendly outdoor wear products.

Keywords

eco-friendly outdoor wear;personal value;pro-environmental belief;pro-environmental norm;purchase intention;value-belief-norm theory

References

  1. Tanner, C. (1999). Constraints on environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(2), 145-157. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0121 https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0121
  2. Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 20(10), 883-902. doi:10.1002/mar.10101 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10101
  3. Thøgersen, J. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(1), 53-81. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9
  4. Yang, J. J., Kim, S., Ham, G., & Lee, Y. (2013). Impacts of environmental value, belief, and personal norm on pro-environmental behavior using VBN theory. Environmental Policy, 21(3), 53-80. doi:10.15301/jepa.2013.09.21.3.53 https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2013.09.21.3.53
  5. Yu, J. B. (2015, April 23). Now essential of eco-friendly for fashion brand. FashionN. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from http://goo.gl/efEGPK
  6. Park, J. W. (2015, April). Rapid growth of outdoor economy, let up. Chosun Magazine. Retrieved July 1, 2015, from http://goo.gl/epylfy
  7. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, Z. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
  8. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T. A., Guagnano, G., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97.
  9. Park, S. H., & Kim, S. H. (2014). Poly (ethylene terephthalate) recycling for high value added textiles. Fashion and Textiles, 1(1), 1-17. doi:10.1186/s40691-014-0001-x https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-014-0001-x
  10. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models, behavior research methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
  11. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism1. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
  12. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
  13. Slimak, M. W., & Dietz, T. (2006). Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis, 26(6), 1689-1705. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.x
  14. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Lazo, J. K., Kinnell, J. C., & Fisher, A. (2000). Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 179-194. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202019 https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202019
  16. Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
  17. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
  18. Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  19. Lee, A. R. (2013, September 23). Grow by self, outdoor - Become Korea fashion, 10 year 10% increase. Apparel News. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://goo.gl/FzaaJx
  20. Lee, H. R. (2011). A study on market segmentation by benefits sought by consumers of outdoor items. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  21. Lee, J. H. (2014, November 27). 7 of 10 of consumers, want ecofriendly material of outdoor clothing. Outdoor News Sympatex Korea. Retrieved June 27, 2015, from http://goo.gl/UqKS7a
  22. Lee, S. H. N., Kim, H. J., & Yang, K. (2015). Impacts of sustainable value and business stewardship on lifestyle practices in clothing consumption. Fashion and Textiles, 2(17), 1-18. doi:10.1186/s40691-015-0043-8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-014-0025-2
  23. Mun, Y. J. (2015). The Influence of sports outdoor wear's brand personality on brand identification, switching barrier, immersion, and customer behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  24. Johan, J., Agneta, M., & Annika, N. (2011). Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco-innovation using value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10, 51-60. doi:10.1002/cb.346 https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.346
  25. Mustapha, H. I. (2010). Application of value beliefs norms theory to the energy conservation behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(2), 1-11. doi:10.5539/jsd.v3n2p129 https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v3n2p129
  26. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740-756. doi:10.1177/001391602237244 https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237244
  27. Paek, K. J., & Lee, J. R. (2014). Draft proposal of smart outdoor wear upon the outdoor wear functionality demand. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 16(3), 446-455. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.3.446 https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.3.446
  28. Kim, H. B., Choo, H. J., & Lee, H. K. (2014a). The effects of social clues on purchase intention in the social commerce: Focusing on the mediation role of social presence and consumer competition. Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(5), 167-188.
  29. Kim, H. S., & Damhorst, M. L. (1998). Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(3), 126-133. doi:10.1177/0887302X9801600303 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9801600303
  30. Kim, H. J., Ahn, S. K., & Forney, J. A. (2014b). Shifting paradigms for fashion: From total to global to smart consumer experience. Fashion and Textiles, 1(1), 1-16. doi:10.1186/s40691-014-0015-4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-014-0001-x
  31. Kim, J. E., Min, S. J., Kim, M. R., & Choi, H. S. (2014c). A study of Chinese consumer's attitude towards Korean wave and wearing condition for outdoor clothing development into the China market - Focused on Chinese tourist-. Fashion & Textiles Research Journal, 16(4), 614-624. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.4.614 https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.4.614
  32. Kim, J. Y. (1998). A study on communication effect of sports marketing, Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  33. Dunlap, R. E., & VanLiere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
  34. Kim, S. I. (2004, February 18). 3 code of reading wellbeing fever. CEO Report, LG week economic, pp. 19-24.
  35. Kim, S. O. (2012). Impact of environmental value, belief, and personal norm on pro-environmental behavior using VBN theory. Unpublished master’s thesis, Sejong University, Seoul.
  36. Kim, S. Y. (2009). Analysis on the perceived purchase behavior environmentally friendly clothing. Unpublished master’s thesis, Mokpo National University, Mokpo.
  37. Ebreo, A., Hershey, J., & Vining, J. (1999). Reducing solid waste linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. Environment and Behavior, 31(1), 107-135. doi:10.1177/00139169921972029 https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972029
  38. Gaskill-Fox, J., Hyllegard, K. H., & Ogle, J. P. (2014). CSR reporting on apparel companies’ websites: Framing good deeds and clarifying missteps. Fashion and Textiles, 1(1), 1-22. doi:10.1186/s40691-014-0011-8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-014-0001-x
  39. Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(3), 335-362. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034003004
  40. Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 699-718. doi:10.1177/0013916595275005 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595275005
  41. Guber, D. L. (2003). The grassroots of a green revolution: Polling America on the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  42. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  43. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  44. Harger, J. R. E., & Meyer, F. M. (1996). Definition of indicators for environmentally sustainable development. Chemosphere, 33(9), 1749-1775. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(96)00194-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(96)00194-4
  45. Jang, Y. S. (2011). A study on development of fashion products design made of environment-friendly fabric materials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  46. Ahn, J. J. (2015). What's the environment for outdoor market? Money Today News. Retrieved April 6, 2015, from http://goo.gl/dGK3W9
  47. Andersson, L., Shivarajan, S., & Blau, G. (2005). Enacting ecological sustainability in the MNC: A test of an adapted value-belief-norm framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(3), 295-305. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3440-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3440-x
  48. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  49. Bennett, W., Stadt, R., & Karmos, J. (1997). Values preferences by gender for nontraditional college students between 1992 and 1982. Counseling and Values, 41(3), 246-252. doi:10.1002/j.2161-007X.1997.tb00406.x https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.1997.tb00406.x
  50. Cha, G. Y., & Kim, M. Y. (2014). A study on the effects of ethical consumption consciousness on purchase attitude of consumers - Focused on recycled apparel. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 64(5), 125-140. doi:10.7233/jksc.2014.64.5.125 https://doi.org/10.7233/jksc.2014.64.5.125
  51. Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 450-471. doi:10.1177/001391659803000402 https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402
  52. Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3-18. doi:10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18 https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Outdoor Wear Consumer Characteristics and Leading Outdoor Wear Brands Using SNS Social Big Data vol.18, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2016.18.1.48
  2. Perceived Consumption Value, Pro-Environmental Belief, Attitude, eWOM, and Purchase Intention Toward Upcycling Fashion Products vol.20, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2018.20.2.177