DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Initiating Smokeless Tobacco Use across Reproductive Stages

Begum, Shahina;Schensul, Jean J.;Nair, Saritha;Donta, Balaiah

  • Published : 2015.12.03

Abstract

Background: The use of smokeless tobacco (SLT) among women is increasing in India, especially among those with limited education and resources. Preventing the initiation of SLT among women is critical since it has known negative consequences for oral and reproductive health. Most research on tobacco initiation in India focuses on adolescents. This paper addresses the unrecognized issues of post marital initiation among women of reproductive age, highlighting the importance of reproductive stages in women's tobacco initiation. The objective is to examine the correlates of SLT initiation among low income women in Mumbai from pre-marriage through early marriage, first pregnancy and beyond, using case examples to illustrate initiation during each of these stages. Materials and Methods: In 2011-2012, cross-sectional community level survey data were collected from a representative sample of 409 daily SLT-using married women aged 18-40 years in a low income community in Mumbai. Information on socio-demographics, initiation by reproductive stage, types of tobacco use, childhood exposure to tobacco, learning to use, and initiation influences and reasons were collected through a researcher-administered survey. Univariate and bivariate analysis assessed factors influencing initiation of SLT use by reproductive stage. In addition 42 narratives of tobacco use were collected from a purposive sample of pregnant and non-pregnant married women addressing the same questions in detail. Narratives were transcribed, translated, and coded for key concepts including initiation of tobacco use. Results: Thirty-two percent of women initiated SLT use before marriage, 44% initiated after marriage but before pregnancy, 18.1% initiated during their first pregnancy and the remainder started after their first pregnancy. Mean age of marriage among women in this study was 16 years. Younger women (i.e. age at time of the interview of less than 30 years) were 0.47 [95% CI (0.32, 0.87)] percent less likely to initiate after marriage than women aged more than 30 years. Women who got married before 18 years of age were 2.34 [95% CI (1.40, 3.93)] times more likely to initiate after marriage than their counterparts. Childhood exposure was a predictor for initiating SLT use prior to marriage but not after. Women reporting tooth and gum pain were 1.85 times more likely to initiate after marriage than their counterparts. Husband and neighbours were the most significant influences on post-marital initiation. Narratives highlighted differences in processes of initiation pre and post marriage and during pregnancy. Conclusions: Most tobacco prevention interventions are directed to adolescents in school. This study suggests that especially for low literate or illiterate women, school based interventions are ineffective. To be effective strategies to prevent SLT initiation must reach women in urban areas at or immediately after marriage and during their first pregnancy. Messages must negate culturally rooted beliefs about the health benefits of SLT in order to prevent initiation and onset of daily use.

Keywords

Smokeless tobacco;India;women;mishri;pan;gutka;marriage;pregnancy;reproductive career

References

  1. Ali NS, Khuwaja AK, Ali T, Hameed R (2009). Smokeless tobacco use among adult patients who visited family practice clinics in Karachi, Pakistan. J Oral Pathol Med, 38, 416-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00754.x
  2. Arora M, Stigler MH, Reddy KS (2011). Effectiveness of health promotion in preventing tobacco use among adolescents in India: research evidence informs national tobacco control programme in India. Global Health Promot, 18, 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975910393163
  3. Dhumal GG, Gupta PC (2013). Assessment of gutka ban in Maharashtra: findings from a focus group discussion. Int J Head Neck Surg, 4, 115-8.
  4. Division-of-Statistics (2011). Family welfare statistics in india, tables a28-30. New Delhi, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  5. Gundala SR, Aneja R (2014). Piper betel leaf: a reservoir of potential xenohormetic nutraceuticals with cancer-fighting properties. Cancer Prev Res, 7, 477-86. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0355
  6. Gupta PC, Ray C, Sinha D, Singh P (2011). Smokeless tobacco: A major public health problem in the SEA region: A review. Indian J Public Health, 55, 199-209. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-557X.89948
  7. Gupta PC (1996). Survey of sociodemographic characteristics of tobacco use among 99,598 individuals in Bombay, India using handheld computers. Tob Control, 5, 114-20. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.5.2.114
  8. Gupta PC, Ray CS (2003). Invited review series: tobacco and lung health. smokeless tobacco and health in India and South Asia. Respirol, 8, 419-31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00507.x
  9. Gupta PC, Sreevidya S (2004). Smokeless tobacco use, birth weight, and gestational age: population based, prospective cohort study of 1217 women in Mumbai, India. BMJ, 328, 1538. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38113.687882.EB
  10. Gupta PC, Subramoney S (2006). Smokeless tobacco use and risk of stillbirth - A cohort study in Mumbai, India. Epidemiol, 17, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000190545.19168.c4
  11. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2004). Betelquid and areca-nut chewing and some areca-nut-derived nitrosamines (Vol. International Agency for Research on Cancer). Lyon: IARC Press.
  12. International Intitute for Population Sciences (2010). Global adult tobacco survey India report (GATS India), 2009-10. New Delhi: MoHFW: international institute of population sciences, ministry of health and family welfare (MoHFW), Government of India.
  13. Nitin J, Nagaraj K, Shashidhar KM (2010). Arecanut and tobacco use among school children in a village in South India -A cross sectional study. AMJ, 3, 299-303.
  14. Khan S, Mehmood M, Ali A, et al (2011). Studies on antiinflammatory and analgesic activities of betel nut in rodents. J Ethnopharmaco, 135, 654-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.03.064
  15. Mishra GA, Pimple AS, Shastri SS (2012). An overview of the tobacco problem in India. Indian J Med Pediatr Oncol, 33, 139-45. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.103139
  16. Nair S, Schensul JJ, Begum S, et al (2015). Use of smokeless tobacco by indian women aged 18-40 years during pregnancy and reproductive years. Plos One, 10, 119814
  17. Nair S, Schensul JJ, Bilgi S, et al (2012). Local responses to the Maharashtra gutka and pan masala ban: A report from Mumbai. Indian J Cancer, 49, 443-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.107754
  18. Narayan DD, Dhondibarao GR, Ghanshyam KC (2011). Prevalence of tobacco consumption among the adolescents of the Tribal Areas in Maharashtra. J Clin Diagnostic Res, 5, 1060-63.
  19. National Cancer Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Smoke thesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
  20. Parasuraman S (2005). A profile of youth in india. national family health survey (nfhs-3): 2005-06. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences.
  21. Parasuraman S, Kishor S, Vaidehi Y (2008). National Family Health Survey, India: Maharashtra. Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & Macro International.
  22. Rani M, Bonu S, Jha P, et al (2003). Tobacco use in India: prevalence and predictors of smoking and chewing in a national cross sectional household survey. Tobacco Control, 12, 4. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.4.e4
  23. Ravishankar TL, Nagarajappa R (2009). Factors attributing to initiation of tobacco use in adolescent students of Moradabad, (UP) India. Indian J Dent Res, 20, 346-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.57382
  24. Reddy KS, Gupta PC (Eds.) (2004). Report on tobacco control in India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA, World Health Organization.
  25. Sazwi NN, Nalina T, Rahim ZHA (2013). Antioxidant and cytoprotective activities of Piper betle, Areca catechu, Uncaria gambir and betel quid with and without calcium hydroxide. BMC Complementary Alternative Medicine, 13, 351-51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-351
  26. Schensul JJ, Nair S, Bilgi S, et al (2013). Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a lowincome area of Mumbai. Tob Control, 22, 324-30. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148
  27. Sinha DN, Gupta PC, Reddy KS, et al (2008). Linking global youth tobacco survey 2003 and 2006 data to tobacco control policy in India. J Sch Health, 78, 368-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00316.x
  28. Subramoney S, Gupta PC (2008). Anemia in pregnant women who use smokeless tobacco. Nicotine Tob Res, 10, 917-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200802027206
  29. Verma A, Muddaiah P, Murthy AK, Sanga R (2015). Exploring an effective tobacco prevention programme for Indian adolescents. Public Health, 129, 23-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2014.11.010
  30. WHO (2010). Prevalence of tobacco use and factors influencing initiation and maintenance among women. In 'Gender, women, and the tobacco epidemic, Eds Samet JM and SY Yoon.WHO, Geneva, 29-49.

Cited by

  1. Toxicity of Smokeless Tobacco Extract after 184-Day Repeated Oral Administration in Rats vol.13, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030281

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Institutes of Health (NIH)