DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of CALPUFF and HYSPLIT Models for Atmospheric Dispersion Simulations of Radioactive Materials

CALPUFF와 HYSPLIT의 방사성물질 대기확산 특성 비교

  • Received : 2015.06.25
  • Accepted : 2015.10.26
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

In this study, the atmospheric dispersion of radioactive material ($^{137}Cs$) was simulated with regard to its impact within a 50-km radius from the Kori Nuclear Power Plant (NKPP) based on two different types of models (the non-steady-state puff model CALPUFF and the lagrangian model HYSPLIT) during the spring of 2012 (May 2012). The dispersion distribution of $^{137}Cs$ calculated in the CALPUFF model was similar to that of the HYSPLIT model, but the magnitudes of differences in its spatio-temporal concentrations between the two models were different. The $^{137}Cs$ concentrations simulated by the CALPUFF were significantly lower than those of the HYSPLIT due to a limitation of puff models (e.g. puff size growth over time). The CALPUFF had the advantage of determining the dispersion of radioactive materials and their impacts on the surrounding regions, compared with the HYSPLIT that had high concentrations of $^{137}Cs$ in only small local areas with the movement of air masses along the local winds.

Keywords

CALPUFF;HYSPLIT;Atmospheric dispersion;Radioactive material

References

  1. An, H.Y., Y.-H. Kang, S.-K. Song, J.-H. Bang, and Y.-K. Kim (2015) Atmospheric dispersion of radioactive material according to the local wind patterns around the Kori nuclear power plant using WRF/HYSPLIT model, JESI, 24(1), 81-96. (in Korean with English abstract)
  2. Connan, O., K. Smith, C. Organo, L. Solier, D. Maro, and D. Hebert (2013) Comparison of RIMPUFF, HYSPLIT, ADMS atmospheric dispersion model outputs, using emergency response procedures, with $^{85}Kr$ measurements made in the vicinity of nuclear reprocessing plant, J. Environ. Radioact., 124, 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.06.004
  3. Hong, S.-Y. and J.O. Lim (2006) The WRF Single-Moment 6-class Microphysics scheme (WSM6), KJAFM, 42, 129-151.
  4. Kain, J.S. (2010) The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update, J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 170-181.
  5. Katata, G., M. Chino, T. Kobayashi, H. Terada, M. Ota, H. Nagai, M. Kajino, R. Draxler, M.C. Hort, A. Malo, T. Torri, and Y. Sanada (2015) Detailed source term estimation of the atmospheric release for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident by coupling simulations of an atmospheric dispersion model with an improved deposition scheme and oceanic dispersion model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1029-1070. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1029-2015
  6. Kim, C.-H. and C.-K. Song (2003) Lagrangian particle dispersion modeling intercomparison: Internal versus foreign modeling results on the nuclear spill event, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 19(3), 249-261. (in Korean with English abstract)
  7. Koo, Y.-S., J.-H. Choi, S.-T. Kim, and S.J. Park (2007) A real-time odor monitoring and modeling system, JOIE, 6(4), 254-258. (in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) (2014) Development of a radioactive substance disperison model in East Asia, Korea.
  9. Korsakissok, I., A. Mathieu, and D. Didier (2013) Atmospheric dispersion and ground deposition induced by the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident: A local-scale simulation and sensitivity study, Atmos. Environ., 70, 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.002
  10. Malwer, E.J., S.J. Taubman, P.D. Brown, M.J. Iacono, and S.A. Clough (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663-166682. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237
  11. Ministry of Science and Technology (2007) Radiological dose assessments through the atmospheric environment, Korea.
  12. National Institute of Environmental Research (2014) Studies on the optimization method for improving the accuracy of air quality modeling, Korea.
  13. NOAA (2014) HYSPLIT4 user's guide, USA.
  14. Pasler-Sauer, J. (2010) Comparison and validation exercises of the three atmospheric dispersion models in RODOS, Radioprotection, DOI:10.1051/radiopro/2010018. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2010018
  15. Skamarock, W.C., J.B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D.M. Grill, D. Baker, M.G. Duda, X. Huang, W. Wang, and J.G. Powers (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-468+STR, Mesoscale and Micro scale Meterology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  16. Srinivas, C.V., R. Venkatesan, R. Baskaran, V. Rajagopal, and B. Venkatraman (2012) Regeional scale atmospheric dispersion simulation of accidental releases of radionuclides from Fukushima Dai-ichi reactor, Atmos. Environ., 61, 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.082
  17. Stohl, A., P. Seibert, G. Wotawa, D. Arnold, J.F. Burkhart, S. Eckhardt, C. Tapia, A. Vargas, and T.J. Yasunari (2012) Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2313-2343. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2313-2012
  18. U.S. EPA (2007) Guidance on the use of models and other analyses for demonstrating attainment of air quality goals for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze, Tech Rep., EPA-454/B-07-002, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  19. Nuclear safety and security commision (2015) 2014 Nuclear safety yearbook, Korea, 242 pp.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단