DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Safety Management Items for Low Pressure Hydrogen Facility below 0.1MPa in Domestic Hydrogen Town

국내 수소타운 내 0.1MPa 이하 저압 수소 사용시설의 안전관리 항목 분석

Lee, Duk-Gwon;Heo, Doo-Hyun;Lee, Sun-Kyu;Lee, Jung-Woon;Lyu, Geun-Jun;Lee, Yeon-Jae;Kim, Hie-Sik
이덕권;허두현;이선규;이정운;유근준;이연재;김희식

  • Received : 2015.12.07
  • Accepted : 2015.12.24
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

As the interest in hydrogen energy is being increased, it is a widely issue to develop a lot of hydrogen technologies in the field of production, storage, transportation, application and others. In the aftermath, there is a hydrogen town in Ul San, which is expected to expand application fields of hydrogen energy, as a demonstration project. The hydrogen town in Ul San can consist of high and low pressure part by the gas pressure. The high pressure part is managed by 'the high pressure gas safety control act'. And, low pressure part is managed by 'the guideline for the safety management of demonstration project of hydrogen town'. In this paper, to improve efficiency of safety management, the direction of safety management is reviewed by an analysis of low pressure hydrogen facility and safety management items. And then, some improvement directions are suggested. In the end, it is expected that the results of this study could help to activate construction of hydrogen town and improve efficiency of safety management as well.

Keywords

hydrogen town;low pressure hydrogen;safety management;hydrogen facility

References

  1. Michael Ball, "The future of hydrogen-opportunities and challenges", Hydrogen energy, 34, 615-627, (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.014
  2. Harikishan R. Ellamla, Iain Staffell, Piotr Bujlo, Bruno G. Pollet, SivaKumar Pasupathi, "Current status of fuel cell based combined heat and power systems for residential sector", Journal of Power Sources, 293, 312-328, (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.050
  3. 안병기, "친환경 수소. 연료전지차 개발 동향", 기계저널, 52(2), 34-38, (2012)
  4. Jun, D. C., "A Study on Safety Policies for a Transition to a Hydrogen Economy", Transactions of the Korean hydrogen and new energy society, 25(2), 161-172, (2014) https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2014.25.2.161
  5. KGS, Facility. Technical. Inspection. Safety Diagnosis Code for Pipes Outside of Producing and Supplying Places of Urban Gas Business, KGS FS551, (2015)
  6. KGS, Facility. Technical. Inspection Code for Governors of General Urban Gas Business, KGS FS552, (2015)
  7. KGS, Facility. Technical. Inspection Code for Urban Gas Using Facilities, KGS FU551, (2015)
  8. 우항수, "울산 수소타운 시범사업 현황", 전기저널, 452, 35-41, (2014)
  9. Shi Jianfeng, " Defects classification and failure mode of electrofusion joint for connecting polyethylene pipes", Journal of applied polymer science, 124(5), pp 4070-4080, (2012) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.35013
  10. American Institute of Aeronautics and astronautics, Guide to safety of hydrogen and hydrogen systems, ANSI/AIAA G-095, (2004)
  11. Compressed Gas Association, Hydrogen pipeline systems, CGA-5.6, (2005)
  12. American Society Mechanical Engineering, Hydrogen piping and pipeline, ASME B31.12, (2014)
  13. International Code Council, International Fuel Gas Code, (2015)
  14. Compressed Gas Association, INC., Standard for hydrogen piping systems at user locations, CGA G-5.4, (2012)
  15. KATS, Basic Considerations for The Safety of Hydrogen Systems, KS B ISO 15916, (2006)
  16. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Permit-required confined spaces, 29 CFR 1910. 146, 2015
  17. N. Rajalakshmi, "Effect of carbon dioxide and ammonia on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack performance", Fuel cells, 3(4), 177-180, (2004)
  18. International Organization for Standardization, PEM fuel cell applications for road vehicles, ISO 14687-2, (2012)
  19. International Organization for Standardization, PEM fuel cell applications for stationary appliances, ISO 14687-3, (2014)
  20. Compressed Gas Association, Commodity specification for hydrogen, CGA-5.3, (2011)

Cited by

  1. An Analysis on Vehicle Accident Factors of Intersections using Random Effects Tobit Regression Model vol.16, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2017.16.1.26

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)