Decomposition of leaf litter of some evergreen broadleaf trees in Korea



Lee, Kyung Eui;Cha, Sangsub;Lee, Sang Hoon;Shim, Jae Kuk

  • 투고 : 2015.08.04
  • 심사 : 2015.10.06
  • 발행 : 2015.11.28


Litter decomposition is an important process in terrestrial ecosystem. However, studies on decomposition are rare, especially in evergreen broadleaf trees. We collected the leaf litter of five evergreen broadleaf trees (Daphniphyllum macropodum, Dendropanax morbifera, Castanopsis cuspidata var. thunbergii, Machilus thunbergii and Quercus acuta), and carried out a decomposition experiment using the litterbag method in Ju-do, Wando-gun, Korea for 731 days from December 25, 2011 to December 25, 2013. Among the five experimental tree species, C. cuspidata var. thunbergii distribution was limited in Jeju Island, and D. macropodum was distributed at the highest latitude at Mt. Baekyang (N 35°40′). About 2% of the initial litter mass of D. macropodum and D. morbifera remained, while 20.9% remained for C. cuspidata var. thunbergii, 30.4% for M. thunbergii, and 31.6% for Q. acuta. D. macropodum litter decayed four times faster (k = 2.02 yr-1) than the litter of Q. acuta (k = 0.58 yr-1). The decomposition of litter was positively influenced by thermal climate such as accumulated mean daily air temperature (year day index) and precipitation, as well as by physical characteristics such as thickness (R2=0.939, P = 0.007) and specific leaf area (SLA) (R2 = 0.964, P = 0.003). The characteristics of chemical composition such as lignin (R2 = 0.939, P = 0.007) and water-soluble materials (R2 = 0.898, P = 0.014) showed significant correlations with litter decomposition. However, the nutrients in litter showed complicated species-specific trends. The litter of D. macropodum and D. morbifera had fast decomposition despite their low nitrogen concentration and high C/N ratio. This means that the litter decomposition was more strongly affected by physical characteristics than chemical composition and nutrient content. On the other hand, the litter of Q. acuta which had the slowest decay rate had a high amount of N and low C/N ratio. Thus, the decomposition of Q. acuta litter was more affected by the P content of the litter than the N content, although all litter had similar physical characteristics.


decomposition;decomposition constant;evergreen broadleaf;leaf litter;physico-chemical effects


  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS III. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30: 1-67.
  2. Aerts R, De Caluwe H. 1997. Nutritional and plant mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78: 244-260.
  3. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby CL. 1974. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 245-247.
  4. Austin AT, Vitousek PM. 1998. Nutrient dynamics on a precipitation gradient in Hawai’i. Oecologia 113: 519- 529.
  5. Austin AT, Vivanco L. 2006. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442: 555-558.
  6. Chang NK, Han SE. 1985. A study on the production and decomposition of litters of evergreen broadleaved forests in Haenam and Koje-do. Korean J Ecol 8: 163-169.
  7. Berg B, Berg MP, Bottner P, Box E, Breymeyer A, de Anta RC, Couteaux M, Escudero A, Gallardo A, Kratz W, Madeira M, Mälkönen E, Mcclaugherty C, Meentemeyer V, Muñoz F, Piussi P, Remacle J, De Santo AV. 1993. Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry 20: 127-159.
  8. Berg B, Lundmark JE. 1987. Decomposition of needle litter in lodgepole pine and Scots pine monocultural systems – A comparison. Scand J For Res 2: 3-12.
  9. Bollen WB. 1953. Mulches and soil conditioners, Carbon and nitrogen in farm and forest products. J Agric Food Chem 7: 379-381.
  10. Chen X, Wei X, Scherer R. 2005. Influence of wildfire and harvest on biomass, carbon pool, and decomposition of large woody debris in forested streams of southern interior British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 208: 101-114.
  11. Cotrufo MF, Briones MJI, Ineson P. 1998. Elevated CO2 affects field decomposition rate and palatability of tree leaf litter: Importance of changes in substrate quality. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1565-1571.
  12. Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 63-66.
  13. Cunha-Santino MBD, Pacobahyba LD, Bianchini Jr I. 2003. Changes in the amount of soluble carbohydrates and polyphenols contents during decomposition of Montrichardia arborescens (L.) Schott. Acta Amazonica 33: 469-476.
  14. Garrett LG, Kimberley MO, Oliver GR, Pearce SH, Beets PN. 2012. Decomposition of coarse woody roots and branches in managed Pinus radiata plantations in New Zealand – A time series approach. For Ecol Manag 269: 116-123.
  15. Fioretto A, Di Nardo C, Papa S, Fuggi A. 2005. Lignin and cellulose degradation and nitrogen dynamics during decomposition of three leaf litter species in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 1083-1091.
  16. Fogel R, Cromack Jr K. 1977. Effect of habitat and substrate quality on Douglas fir litter decomposition in western Oregon. Can J Bot 55: 1632-1640.
  17. Gallardo A, Merino J. 1992. Nitrogen immobilization in leaf litter at two Mediterranean ecosystems of SW Spain. Biogeochemistry 15: 213-228.
  18. Gessner MO. 1991. Differences in processing dynamics of fresh and dried leaf litter in a stream ecosytem. Freshw Biol 26: 387-398.
  19. Han YS. 2014. A study on carbon distribution and budget of dominant plant community in Gotjawal, Jeju Island. MS Thesis. Kongju University, Gongju, South Korea.
  20. Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ. 1997. Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In:Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition (Cadisch G, Giller KE, eds). CAB International, Wallingford, pp 3-32.
  21. Helrich KC. 1990. Official methods of Analysis of the AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc. Arlington, VA.
  22. Hobbie SE. 1996. Temperature and plants species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66: 503-522.
  23. Klotzbücher T, Kaiser K, Guggenberger G, Gatzek C, Kalbitz K. 2011. A new conceptual model for the fate of lignin in decomposing plant litter. Ecology 92: 1052-1062.
  24. Koukoura Z, Mamolos AP, Kalburtji KL. 2003. Decomposition of dominant plant species litter in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 23: 13-23.
  25. Lamlom SH, Savidge RA. 2003. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy 25: 381-388.
  26. Lim SM, Cha SS, Shim JK. 2011. Effects of simulated acid rain on microbial activities and litter decomposition. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 401-410.
  27. Meentemeyer V. 1978. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59: 465-472.
  28. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621-626.
  29. Millar CS. 1974. Decomposition of coniferous leaf litter. In:Biology of plant litter decomposition. (Dickinson C H, Pugh G J F, eds). Academic press, London and New York, pp 105-128.
  30. Moretto AS, Distel RA, Didoné NG. 2001. Decomposition and nutrient dynamic of leaf litter and roots from palatable and unpalatable grasses in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 18: 31-37.
  31. Olson JS. 1963. Energy Storage and the Balance of Producers and Decomposers in Ecological Systems. Ecology 44: 322-331.
  32. Polyakova O, Billor N. 2007. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For Ecol Manage 253: 11-18.
  33. Ribeiro C, Madeira M, Arau´jo MC. 2002. Decomposition and nutrient release from leaf litter of Eucalyptus globules grown under different water and nutrient regimes. For Ecol Manag 171: 31-41.
  34. Silver WL, Miya RK. 2001. Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129: 407-419.
  35. Rowland AP, Roberts JD. 1994. Lignin and cellulose fractionation in decomposition studies using acid-detergent fibre methods. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25: 269-277.
  36. Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM. 2003. Interactions between litter quality, decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 391-399.
  37. Saura-Mas S, Estiarte M, Penuelas J, Lloret F. 2012. Effects of climate change on leaf litter decomposition across post-fire plant regenerative groups. Environ Exp Bot 77: 274-282.
  38. Singh KP, Singh PK, Tripathi SK. 1999. Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns in four native tree species raised on coal mine spoil at Singrauli, India. Biol Fertil Soils 29: 371-378.
  39. Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS. 1999. Litter production and leaf-litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in Western Ghats, India. For Ecol Manag 123: 231-244.
  40. Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. University of California Press, Oakland, CA.
  41. Tateno R, Tokuchi N, Yamanaka N, Du S, Otsuki K, Shimamura T, Xue Z, Wang S, Hou Q. 2007. Comparison of litterfall production and leaf litter decomposition between an exotic black locust plantation and an indigenous oak forest near Yan’an on the Loess Plateau, China. Forest Ecol Manage 241: 84–90.
  42. Van Vuuren MMI, Berendse F, De Visser W. 1993. Species and site differences in the decomposition of litters and roots from wet heathlands. Can J Bot 71: 167-173.
  43. Vitousek PM, Turner DR, Parton WJ, Sanford RL. 1994. Litter decomposition on the Mauna Loa environmental matrix, Hawai’i: patterns, mechanisms, and models. Ecology 75: 418-429.
  44. Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y. 2008. Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. For Ecol Manag 255: 1210–1218.
  45. Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Townsend AR. 2009. Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests. Ecology 90: 3333-3341.
  46. Won HY, Kim DK, Lee KJ, Park SB, Choi JS, Mun HT. 2014. Long term decomposition and nutrients dynamics of Quercus mongolica and Pinus densiflora leaf litter in Mt. Worak National Park. Korean J Environ Ecol 28: 566-573.
  47. Yang FF, Li YL, Zhou GY, Wenigmann KO, Zhang DQ, Wenigmann M, Liu SZ, Zhang QM. 2010. Dynamics of coarse woody debris and decomposition rates in an old-growth forest in lower tropical China. For Ecol Manag 259: 1666-1672.
  48. Yang KC. 1995. Studies on litter decomposition and nutrient release in some three spacies. MS Thesis. Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  49. Yim YJ, Kira T. 1975. Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korea peninsula; I. Distribution of some indices of thermal climate. Jap J Ecol 25: 77-88.
  50. Yim YJ, Lee WC. 1976. On the vegetations of Judo and Gamagseum. J Plant Biol 19: 49-61.
  51. Zimmer M. 2002. Is decomposition of woodland leaf litter influenced by its species richness?. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 277-284.