Monetary Penalty System and Privacy

벌금형 제도의 현대적 가치와 개인정보문제

  • Kim, Woon-Gon (Dept.of Maritime Police, Chosun College of Science & Technology)
  • 김운곤 (조선이공대학교 해양경찰과)
  • Received : 2015.05.07
  • Accepted : 2015.05.25
  • Published : 2015.06.30


A fine is defined to the criminal penalty which is slighter than imprisonment on a system of criminal penalty, but put practically a seat to imprisonment and similar strong discipline contrivance to commission agent in capitalism societies be doing. Also, did heavy commission, but the corporation time, a fine to consider the respect which cannot impose other criminal penalty, and cannot but impose fine penalty only to this corporation carries out art as important criminal penalty than the commission which a person does. But fine drawing of our country cannot carry out art scaring to criminal penalty to rich body as aggregate fine drawing, and a lot of, but do abatement duration of a fine so as same, and be most in spite of adjudication criminal sentence occupying at criminal case adjudication, and difference cannot do to an amount of a fine that is carrying well out the art. Therefore, and have to change to the daily fine systemdm which gained because of total fine system in order to carry out value as modern criminal penalty, and a few fines shall exchange to penalty payment system according to complement department canon of Penal Code, and social accusation protects individual information of low commission agent if so, can normally do art accomplishment of criminal penalty. The system that the maximum can guarantee right of defence of accused has to have to be introduced in procedural a few aspect to pronounce this and a fine. Specially, let explain necessary fact to be related to, and informal procedures understand, and introduction of drawing to be able to get from accord of accused is necessary for accused before charging to informal decree in order cannot be guaranteed right of defence this of accused while consisting in writing of whether accusation and adjudication are procedural at informal procedures, and to supplement respect.


  1. Winfried Hassemer, Warm Strafe sein muss, Translator : Bae Jong-Dae.Yoon Jae-Wang, Nanam Publishing Co., 2011, p.130.
  2. Dona Weekly Magazine, "Problem of detention in labor house", Vol. 931, 2014. 3. 31, p.57.
  3. Park, Jae-yoon, "Comments, General Provision of Criminal Act(2)", Korea Law & Administration Research Institute, 2011, p.500.
  4. Kim, Hye-Kyung, "Fines to be proportional to imprisonment", Korea Journal of Criminology, Vol.24 No.2, 2012, Korean ABociation of Criminology, p.111.
  5. Japan Supreme Court, 1950. 6. 27. Case of Criminal, 46, 958.
  6. Jo, Dae-hwan, "Problems of detention in a work", Legal Profession Journal, Vol.47 No.3, 1998, Korea ABociation of Legal Profession, p.6.
  7. Kim, Il-soo.Seo, Bo-hak, Particulars of Criminal Law, Pakyoungsa, 2002, p.789.
  8. Meyer-Gossner, ${\S}$407 Rn. 1; Zipf, S. 230.
  9. Song Kwang-soub, "The Current utilization of summary proceedings, its drawbacks and directions for improvement", Prosecution Service, Vol.40, 2013. 9, Supreme Prosecutor's Office, p.179.
  10. Roxin/Schunemann, Strafverfahrensrecht, 26. Aufl. 2009, S. 489-490.
  11. Fischer, Karlsruher Kommentar, StPO, vor ${\S}$ 407 Rn. 2.
  12. Supra Note 9, p.200.
  13. Supra Note 3, pp.503-504.
  14. Jang, yoon-seok, "the Improvement of Summary proceedings", Legal Profession Journal, Vol., 47 No. 2, 1998, Korea ABociation of Legal Profession, p.168.
  15. Supra Note 9, p.207.
  16. You, Keun-seob, "Japan summary proceedings", Prosecutor, Vo., 95, 1987, p.336
  17. Supra Note 14, p.166.
  18. Hong, Jin-young, "The right of privacy decision and dispute resolution", Study on the civil case, Vol., 35, 2013, 02., Pakyoungsa, pp.743-744.
  19. Japan Supreme Court, 1981. 4. 14. Case of Civil, Vol., 35, No.,3, p.620
  20. Kim, Young-cheol, "Studyon the Protective Privacy in Criminal Law",Dissertation of Kunkook University, 1996, pp.43-44.
  21. Kim, Young-cheol, "Case of Protective Privacy in Criminal Law", Justice, Vol., 30, No., 1.,1997, 'Korea Legal Center, p.71.
  22. SCP 1993. 3. 23. 92Do455.
  23. Lim, Woong, "A study on the Decriminalization",Sungkyunkwan Law Review, Vol., 19, No., 3,2007. 12., Sungkyunkwan Comparative LawResearch, p.466.
  24. Supra Note 14, pp.166-167.
  25. Rhee Joo Won, Zur Auswirkung derStrafauBerkraftsetzung auf Urteile imkoreanischen Strafausserkraftsetzungsgesetz,Lawyers Association journal, No.469, 2004,Korea Association of Legal Profession, p.214.