After-School Education-Infrastructure in Neighborhood Units

근린단위 방과후 학습 교육기반에 관한 연구

  • Kimm, Woo-Young
  • 김우영
  • Received : 2013.09.05
  • Accepted : 2015.06.10
  • Published : 2015.06.30


As verifying the right scale of a learning community unit, making after-school facilities as a part of local learning communities in urban areas, and utilizing collective schools in which participants can access to customized programs, this research is to define the concept of local education community(LEC) which provides various programs of life-long learning. A survey of practical cases of the LEC in the district of Gangnam-Gu is to analyze proximity of the current after-school activities between students and schools and then it can address the potential coalition among education communities in terms of remote participation, learning network, and open-to-public school. In typological approach to the LEC, the case study developed the interactive overlap in the layout of 30 local schools that displays the inter-relation of adjacent schools. The graphs of school ranks based on the national evaluation of 'Student Performance Test' can address the preferred schools that has a larger catchment area in the local district. Reorganizing the learning community consisting of participant oriented schools in a regional society will be a critical agenda that can be achieved by both public and private supports. To verify the practical approach of urban types of the LEC, case studies of the research include a conceptual analysis of community clusters in terms of high-performing schools based on national exam ranks, after-school learning programs, and inhabitants pathways to alternative schools. Findings over the cases insinuate not only how to organize the LEC by public transit with hypothetical issues relating to urban renewal but also enhance active participation with social networks.


Education Community;After-school;Public School;School District;Education-Infrastructure


  1. Baek, B. B. (2012). The Effects of Extra-Curricular Activities in or out of School on the Middle School Students' School Adjustment and Value Awareness of School. The Korean Educational Review, 18(1), 143-167.
  2. Cheon, M. H. (2013). How different K-12 After-School Programs are by Schools. JoongAng Ilbo.
  3. Choi, M. J. (2014). Anchor School Implementation Interviewed by Yongrin Moon, Superintendent of SMOE "Student Happiness First, No Sleeping Child at School". Chosun Biz.
  4. Eum, S. W. (2013). Drop the National Curriculum 'High School Support Plan'. HanKyoReh.
  5. Jung, K. H. (2003). Contents and Trend of Entrance Exam Revolution based on 2004 Tokyo High School Entrance Exam Guideline. Education Policy Network Information Center.
  6. Kim, E. K. (2012). A Study for Media Education Practice Plan through After-School Program in Local Society. Journal of Communication Science, 12(2), 200-239.
  7. Kim, H. S., & Nam, J. H. (2014). The Provisional Suitability of Nursery Facilities in Seoul: Focused on the Analysis of Service Areas. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 30(3), 203-213.
  8. Kim, H. W. et al. (2010). After-School Quality Upgrade Action Plan. 2010 Policy Development Research Project, Korean Educational Development Institute.
  9. Kim, H., & Kim, J. C. (2012). A Study on the Effects of After-School Program Participation on Children's Academic Achievement: Focused on the Mediating Effects on Self-Directed Learning Skills and Creativity. Soonchunhyang Journal of Humanities, 31(2), 172-199.
  10. Kim, J. H. (2014). After Prohibiting Prior Learning 'No Registration' of After-School Program. HanKyoReh.
  11. Kim, K. Y., & Woo, J. Y. (2009). Cheap Prestige Lecture...That's Right.
  12. Kim, M. H. (2014). A Comparative Study on the Operating Systems of After-School Programs between Korea and U.S.. The Journal of Elementary Education, 27(1), 1-28.
  13. Kim, S. S. (2012). A Study on the Difference of School Adaptation of 1st Graders by Student's Backgrounds and After-School Activities in Korean Elementary Schools. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(3), 27-47.
  14. Kim, Y. H., & Kim, N. S. (2013). Education After-School Study International Trends: Germany, Britain, France around. Korean Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 343-365.
  15. Kimm, W. Y. (2010). Spatial Identity of the Life-Long Educational Institution. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(8), 11-19.
  16. Lee, S. M. et al. (2007). A Study on the Improvement of After-School Education's Operating System. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(3), 289-314.
  17. Middle-High Education Department (2008). Open up to 9 Extensions of Prestige Gangnam After-School Anchor School. Promotion Material Room. Seoul Gangnam District Office of Education.
  18. Middle-High Education Department (2009). The 4th Prestige Gangnam After-School Anchor School. Promotion Material Room, Seoul Gangnam District Office of Education.
  19. Park, J. H., & Lee, S. H. (2013). Characteristics of the Street in Housing Complex based on Children's Active Transportation. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(11), 55-66.
  20. Reich, J. (2015). Preparing Students for Learning, Not Lectures, In college. Education Week.
  21. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education(SMOE) (2012). 2012 After-School Consolidation Support Plan. Retrieved from
  22. Shim, H. B., & Park, S. H. (2012). A Study of Social Issues and Decision Making Process of the School Location. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(12), 341-352.
  23. Shim, H. J. (2013). Art and Athletics Applicants from High Schools "No Need of Private Lesson Due to Anchor Schools". Chosun Biz.
  24. Shin, H. S., & Kim, M. J. (2012). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Elementary Subject-Based After-School Programs on the Reduction of Achievement Gap. Journal of Education Evaluation, 25(3), 435-458.
  25. Shon, H. K. (2009). The Constitutionality of the Consigned Management of the After-School Programs. The Journal of Educational Administration, 27(2), 305-328.
  26. Wilson, L. (2015). Modern learning environments in Waikato schools. Waikato Times.