Abstraction of the Definition of Engineering Design Ability and its Subdivision and Element by the Survey of Experts' Recognition

전문가 인식 조사에 의한 공학 설계 능력의 정의 및 하위 영역과 요소 도출

  • Received : 2015.04.27
  • Accepted : 2015.05.28
  • Published : 2015.05.29

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to consider theoretical points of view on a preceding research related to an engineering design and abstract the definition of engineering design ability, its subdivision and element on the basis of experts' recognition. To achieve this goal, various literature researches were carried out by examining domestic and foreign articles in journals, lots of dissertations, and books related to engineering design through theoretical consideration. And to secure the validity on the definition of engineering design ability, its subdivision and element through the theoretical study, a feasibility evaluation method by the experts was applied. And the feasibility evaluation of the experts was conducted through 2 stages. The major conclusions of this study are as follows. Firstly, based on the experts' recognition on the definition of engineering design ability, its subdivision and element, which were revised through the 1st feasibility evaluation and then utilized in the 2st one, the validity was confirmed, and the subdivisions of the engineering design ability were divided into 5 and the elements of the subdivision ability were 33. Secondly, the engineering design ability was defined as "the one to design a realizable product with consumers' demand fully satisfying, based on a knowledge application ability, thinking ability, communication ability, problem-solving ability, and teamwork ability to solve engineering problems." Thirdly, the subdivisions of the engineering design ability were divided as a knowledge application ability, thinking ability, communication ability, problem-solving ability, and teamwork ability.

Keywords

Engineering Design Ability;Engineering Design;Definition of Engineering Design Ability;Subdivision and element of Engineering Design Ability;Expert Validation;Engineering Education;Engineering Design Education

References

  1. 김대영 외. (2006). 공학전문가가 인식하는 공학기초능력의 구성요소에 관한 연구. 공학교육연구, 9(2), 34-51.
  2. 김태훈, 이소이, 노태천. (2005). 공학설계능력의 평가 요소 구명. 공학교육연구, 8(3), 49-56.
  3. 김희필. (2004). 기술 교과 교육의 목돼 내용 구성을 위한 기술적 능력의 구성 요인. 충남대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  4. 박세호. (2012). 창의적 문제해결 기법을 활용한 공회입문설계 교육 내용 모형 연구. 한국해양대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  5. 배진승, 박강. (2013). 공학입문설계교과의 통합 운영이 신입생의 창의적 설계 능력에 미치는 효과. 2013 대한기계학회 춘추학술대회.
  6. 신선희. (2009). 공학교육에서의 개념학습을 위한 탐구활동 지원도구 설계 연구. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  7. 이종수 외. (2008). 체험학습기반의 기초 창의공학설계 교육 및 운영. 공학교육연구, 11(2), 32-41
  8. 이창훈. (2007). 창의 공학 설계 교육 프로그램이 공학 입문자의 창의력과 공학 설계 능력에 미치는 효과. 충남대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  9. 윤나리. (2012.) 공학설계 강의에서 활용된 문제중심학습의 효과 측정. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  10. Cross, N. (2004). Engineering design methods : Strategies for product design(3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Eggert, R. J. (2010). 공학 설계(강남철 역). 시그마프레스.
  12. Ford, R. M., & Coulston, C. S. (2009). 공학 설계상의 원리와 실제(장준호 외 역). 한티미디어.
  13. Haik, Y. (2004). Engineering design process. Thompson Learning.
  14. Thompson, B. S. (1998). Creative Engineering Desing(4th ed.). Okemos Press.
  15. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단