Creative Problem Solving Process using TRIZ Contradiction Analysis

트리즈의 모순분석을 활용한 창의적 문제해결 실습과정

  • Received : 2014.06.10
  • Accepted : 2015.05.07
  • Published : 2015.05.29

Abstract

Many methods have been suggested for a creative problem solving approach. TRIZ approach is ranked top in its practical application because it is originated from the real patent analysis. This approach is assumed to be generic which can be applied to any types of problems regardless of problem type and its domain. The objective of this study is to propose a creative problem solving approach using TRIZ's contradiction analysis, then introduce a case study of applying this approach to a creative design coursework. Main topic covers a creative problem solving approach, a problem definition using TRIZ contradiction analysis, finding invention principles, and problem solving from the generic approach. For the course project, Roborobo tool is adopted to implement the design concept. This coursework helps students finding a general problem solving approach, and applying a generic solution for their specific problem domain.

Keywords

TRIZ;Creative problem solving;Contradiction analysis;Technical contradiction;Creativity design;Roborobo

References

  1. 유인근(2007). 공학교육인증 프로그램의 효과적인 운영방안에 관한 연구, 공학교육연구, 10(2) : 62-72.
  2. 이경원(2010). 대학의 창의적 설계교육에 적합한 퀵 트리즈프로세스와 적용 사례들, 한국정밀공학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회논문집, 871-872.
  3. 장용철.김건국.김민철(2013). 창의설계 입문의 PBL 적용: 충남대학교 환경공학분야 사례. 공학교육연구, 16(2) : 78-85.
  4. 지해성(2013). 학제간 팀별 설계프로젝트 기반 산학공동 공학설계교육. 공학교육연구, 16(3) : 51-60.
  5. 한병기.지해성(2006). 공학교육에서의 디자인 및 창의적 설계 교육. 공학교육연구, 9(4) : 19-27.
  6. Osborn, Alex (2001). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving, Creative Education Foundation Press, ISBN 0-930222-73-3.
  7. 김병제.박성균(2006). 알기쉬운 트리즈. 인터비젼.
  8. 김은경(2013). 창의적 공학설계. 한빛미디어
  9. 김태운(2008) 강건설계방법을 활용한 창의적 문제해결 실습과정, 공학교육연구, 11(1) 64-75.
  10. 김효준.정진하.권정희(2004). 생각의 창의성. 지혜.
  11. 박강.박용원.김병재.장혁수.김영욱(2010). 창의공학 2판, 인피니티북스.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 경성대학교