International Comparative Study on Astronomical Exhibits: Focus on Exhibit Characteristics and Earth Science Curriculum Reflected in Exhibits

천체 전시물 비교 연구 -전시특성 및 지구과학 교육과정의 반영 정도를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2016.11.08
  • Accepted : 2016.12.19
  • Published : 2016.12.31


For students, astronomy is not only interesting but also difficult to learn. However, there is a limit in learning astronomy in a school science setting since astronomy is vast subject. Fortunately, science museums can be helpful in overcoming this limitation. Experiences in science museum provide something that any descriptions or illustrations cannot give. Therefore, to maximize the educational effect, it is necessary to look at astronomical exhibits regarding the educational aspects and complement them. For these reasons, the purpose of this study is to investigate characteristics of exhibitions related to astronomy and how much the exhibitions reflect the contents of their science curricula. We selected famous science museums in Korea, America, and Japan and analyzed characteristics of their astronomy exhibition. We analyze these characteristics in the aspects of exhibition technology & media, presentation method and activity types. Also, this study figures out how content of exhibitions are connected to school science curriculum. The results are summarized as follows: First, Science Museums of America and Japan utilize interactive exhibits to raise participation. It implies that Science Museum of Korea needs Interactive Exhibits that provide a realistic experience of the universe. Second, the astronomy exhibits reflect some of the learning elements of their science curricula concerned with astronomy. However, these astronomical contents are included selectively and not according to their required curriculum. It means that many students lack the opportunity to study Astronomy in their schools. Therefore, the astronomy museum must reflect learning elements of science curricula concerned with astronomy in the exhibits.


science museum;astronomy;Earth science curriculum;interactive exhibition;Big History


Supported by : 한국연구재단


  1. Al-Khalifah, A., McCrindle, R., Sharkey, P., & Alexandrov, V. (2006). Using virtual reality for medical diagnosis, training and education. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 5(2), 187-194.
  2. Beiers, M. R., & McRobbie, C. (1992). Learning in interactive science centres. Research in science education, 22(1), 38-44.
  3. Bitgood, S. (1991). Suggested guidelines for designing interactive exhibits. Visitor Behavior, 6(4), 4-11.
  4. Borun, M., & Dritsas, J. (1997). Developing family-friendly exhibits. Curator: The Museum Journal, 40(3), 178-196.
  5. Choi, M. H., & Choi, B. S. (1999). Content Organization of Middle School Integrated Science Focusing on the Integrated Theme. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(2), 204-216.
  6. Christian, D., Brown, C., & Benjamin, C. (2013). Big history: between nothing and everything.
  7. Doo, K., & Kim, S. (2012). The Study on the Interactive Display Video Activating Plan in Experience-Type Media Space. Journal of Korea Design Knowledge, 24.
  8. Dunser, A., & Hornecker, E. (2007, June). An observational study of children interacting with an augmented story book. In International Conference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment (pp. 305-315). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  9. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Altamira Press.
  10. Feher, E. (1990). Interactive museum exhibits as tools for learning: explorations with light. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 35-49.
  11. Fruland, R. M. (2002). Using immersive scientific visualizations for science inquiry: Co-construction of knowledge by middle and high school students. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  12. Go, D. (2003). A study on the spatial plan and the exhibition production strategy for the children's design museum. Hongik University Graduate School, Master's thesis.
  13. Hein, G. E. (1999). The constructivist museum. The educational role of the museum, 73-79.
  14. Hein, G. E. (2002). Learning in the Museum. Routledge.
  15. Hwang, E. J. (2006). The Characteristics and Correlations between Earth Science Exhibits and School Science Curriculum - Focused on the Representative Natural History Museums in the World-. Seoul National University Graduate School, Master's thesis.
  16. Jeong, S. Y. (2012). Study of time structure and receptive structure in science exhibition. Hongik University Graduate School, Master's thesis.
  17. Joh, E. (2010). A study on features of emotional expression on the Science Museum space. Journal of the Korea Institute of Spatial Design, 7(2), 79-86.
  18. Kim, C. J., Shin, M. K., Lee, C. Z., & Cha, H. J. (2006). School earth science curriculum reflected in exhibits and an educational analysis of exhibition methods: Cases of natural history museums in the US. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 27(2), 130-139.
  19. Kim, C. -J., Shin, M. -K., & Lee, S. -K. (2010). Understanding informal science learning. Seoul: Bookshill.
  20. Kim, H. S., & Park, B. M. (2006). A Study on the Status of Experiential Exhibition Facilities in Exhibition Space - A focus on A Medium of Digital Media -. Archives of Design Research, 19(5), 293-392.
  21. Kim, K. S., Lee, S. K., & Kim, C. J. (2009). Characteristics of Children's Interactive Learning in a Natural History Museum. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 30(1), 127-140.
  22. Kim, S. H., & Song, J. W. (2003). The characteristics of the exhibits in science centers and students' perceptions about the exhibits-in the case of 3 science centers in seoul. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(5), 544-560.
  23. Kim, S. (2014). Analysis of the relation between the contents of physics exhibits in science center and middle school science curriculum 2009 and its pedagogical applications : the case of National Gwangju Science Museum. Yonsei University Graduate School, Master's thesis.
  24. Kim, W. (2003). Study on the characteristics of medium and production for improved sensibility interface of exhibit space. Hongik University Graduate School, Master's thesis.
  25. Koo, D. H. (2010). A Study on Interactive exhibits, planning and production processes. Korea Science & Art Forum, 6, 1-11.
  26. Lee, S. -Y., & Yoon, J. -E. (2012). A Study on an Storytelling of Museum's exhibition by applying concept of ‘Event'- Focusing on Holocaust Museum -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 21(3), 58-66.
  27. Lee, S. -K., Park, J., Ko, S. Y., Yu, E. -J., Yoon, R. N., Chung, S. I., & Shin, D. H. (2015). Analysis of the Exhibition in Korean Natural Heritage Center as a Field of Environmental Education. Journal of Korean Society for Environmental Education, 28(4), 262-279.
  28. Leem, S. Y., & Hong, S. (2005). New Changes and Tasks of the Science Museum: Focusing on its relation to PUS. Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 5(2), 97-127.
  29. Lim, C. H. (2003). Nature and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Teaching. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 24(4), 235-249.
  30. Meichtry, Y. J. (1993). The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 429-443.
  31. Melber, L. M., & Abraham, L. M. (2002). Science education in US natural history museums: A historical perspective. Science & Education, 11(1), 45-54.
  32. Ministry of culture sports and tourism of Korea (2010).
  33. Park, S. J., Shin, S. H., Yoo, J. H., Yoon, S. K., Jeon, T. I., & Jeong, I. K. (2007). A Study on the Promotion of Science Museums. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  34. Rix, C., & McSorley, J. (1999). An investigation into the role that school-based interactive science centres may play in the education of primary-aged children. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 577-593.
  35. Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of research in science teaching, 40(2), 121-137.
  36. Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. In Augmented Reality Toolkit, The First IEEE International Workshop (pp. 8-pp). IEEE.
  37. Shin, M. R., & Lee, Y. S. (2011). The Effects of RSM-Based Astronomical Observation Program on Astronomical Spatial Concept and Self-Directed Learning for the Scientific Gifted Students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 21(4), 993-1009.
  38. Stevenson, J. (1991). The long-term impact of interactive exhibits. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 521-531.
  39. Uh, Y. H., Choi, J. W., & Kim, K. H. (2014). A Proposal on necessity of an interactive hands-on exhibit integrated management system -based on domestic national science museum-. Korea Science & Art Forum, 17, 247-259.
  40. Wellington, J. (1990). Formal and Informal Learning in Science: The Role of the Interactive Science Centres. Physics Education, 25(5), 247-52.
  41. Yun, G. A., Choi, S. I., Jeong, K. S., & Lee. H. (2009). The Analysis of Science Curricula Reflected Programs in Astronomy Science Museums. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(1), 142-151.
  42. Christian, D. (2008). Big history: The big bang, life on earth, and the rise of humanity.
  43. National plan for the science and technology museums. Korea: Ministry of Science and Technology (2006).