A Case Study on Application of the NABI Program to Realize the 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character'

'실천 중심 인성 발현 메커니즘' 구현을 위한 NABI 프로그램의 적용 사례

  • Received : 2016.11.25
  • Accepted : 2016.12.21
  • Published : 2016.12.31


Today, in accordance with emphasizing the importance of character education, science educators have tried to implement character education in the field of science education. Therefore, this research aims to confirm the possibility of the realization of 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' developed on the basis of character education theory through the application of the NABI Program based on Nature-Study. For this, the NABI program was applied to 24 3rd grade students of an elementary school for a period of ten months. Qualitative data was collected like students' reports, journals, and video recording of the classes. This data was classified into 'value, judgment, action,' the steps of 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character,' and text was written by interpreting the data. The research resulted in the following: First, students formed 'value' by making a connection with the objects. And the various values - individual, interpersonal, social, ecological, and spiritual - are formed according to the type of objects with which the students felt a connection to. Second, students need to judge the problems of the real world at the 'judgment' step. Third, at the 'action' step, students practice moral behavior in relation to the sympathy or feeling they felt with the objects that they made a connection to. In conclusion, 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' can be realized through the application of the NABI Program. The NABI Program can be a definite way to implement character education in the field of science education.


Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character;Character Education;NABI Program


Supported by : 한국연구재단


  1. Armitage, K. C. (2009). The nature study movement: The forgotten popularizer of America's conservation ethic. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  2. Bailey, L. H. (1903). The nature-study idea: Being an interpretation of the new school movement to put the child in sympathy with nature. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company.
  3. Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. E. (2003). Integrating science education and character education. In Zeidler, D. L. (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (Chap. 6. pp. 117-138). Dordrecht, Boston, New York and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues(SSI). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
  5. Character Education Promotion Act, No. 13004 (2015).
  6. Cho, M. (2015). A phenomenological study on group creativity experiences of elementary science-gifted students. Doctoral dissertation, Konkuk University.
  7. Cho, Y. (1999). Qualitative description, analysis, interpretation. The Journal of Anthropology of Education, 2(2), 27-63.
  8. Cho, Y., Kim, A., Im, H., Sin, D., Cho, A., & Kim, I. (1998). Component factors of desirable character education. Journal of educational studies, 28, 131-152.
  9. Choi, J., Park. C., Yeon, K., Min. Y., Lee. E., Jung, W., Seo, J., Cha, D., Hur, J., & Lim, C. (2009). The problem of character education and alternative approach in korea(creative character education). The Journal of creativity education, 9(2), 89-112.
  10. Doris, E. E. (2002). The practice of nature-study: What reformers imagined and what teachers did (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3055845).
  11. Eick, C. J. (2012). Use of the outdoor classroom and nature-study to support science and literacy learning: A narrative case study of a third-grade classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 789-803.
  12. Gardner, H. (2002). Intelligence reframed. (Moon, Y. Tran.). Seoul: Gimmyoung. (original work published 1999).
  13. Greenawalt, C. E. (1996). Character education in America. Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives, Harrisburg, PA. ED398327.
  14. Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition on empathy. In Izard, C. E., Kagan, J., & Zajonc, R. B. (Eds.) Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Huh, S. (2016). The current problem and task of humanity education of elementary school. Journal of Learning Strategy Intervention, 7(1), 37-49.
  16. Jang, J., Mun, J., Ryu, H., Choi, K., Krajcik, J., & Kim, S. (2012). Korean middle school students' perceptions as global citizens of socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1124-1138.
  17. Jeong, C., Chang, K., Lee, D., Song, S., & Woo, Y. (2016). Creating practical action plans for character education through student-teacher/studentstudent interactions. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 40, 1-27.
  18. Johnson, K. (2013). The nature-study movement, Green Teacher, 99, 16-20.
  19. Kang, S., Park, E., Kim, G., Song, S., Chung, Y., Kim, Y., & Ko, M. (2008). A foundational study for the vision of education for the human nature for 21st century. The Journal of Research in Education, 30, 1-38.
  20. Kim, H., & Lim, H. (2014). Elementary science gifted students' perceptions of decision-making activities on socioscientific issues. The Journal of Education, 34(3), 237-252.
  21. Kim, J., Bang, M., Bae, S., Hong, Y., Choi, J., Lee, N., Seo, S., Bae, J., Lee, Y., Lee, H., & So, K. (2014). The effect of STEAM education program using movies on the creative personality, creative problem-solving ability and scientific attitude of elementary scientific gifted. Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 120-132.
  22. Knapp, C. E., & Woodhouse, J. L. (2006). The nature study movement: A revolt to promote school reform. Thresholds in Education, 32(3), 20-25.
  23. Kohlstedt, S. G. (2010). Teaching children science: Hands-on nature study in north America, 1890-1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (2011). A study on how to activate character education through subjects education and creative extra curricular activities (RRC 2011-7-1). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  25. Kwon, H., & Kim, C. (2007). Beginning earth science teachers' perceptions about learning in geologic field trip. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28(1), 14-23.
  26. Lee, H., & Chang, H. (2011). Enlargement of Pre-service Science Teachers' Understanding of SSI Teaching through a Teacher Education Program. Journal of Research in Curriculum instruction, 15(4), 911-930.
  27. Lee, J., You, S., & Lee, Y. (2015). Exploring instructional methods for the integration of subject education and character education. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 26(3), 463-487.
  28. Lee, Y., & Kim, Y. (2012). The effects of the creative thinking and creative personality using the ‘Weather and our life' on science-based STEAM. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(2), 204-212.
  29. McComas, W. F. (2008). Back to the future? Science Teacher, 75(2), 24-28.
  30. Ministry of Education. (2014a). Policy research for the establishment of vision in character education. Seoul: Jinhan M&B.
  31. Ministry of Educational Science and Technology. (2011). Ethics Curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of the MEST. Seoul: Ministry of Educational Science and Technology
  32. Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral-ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues(SSI). In Tippins, D. J., Mueller, M. P., van Eijck, M., & Adams, J. D. (Eds). Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (Chap. 8, pp. 105-128). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
  33. Park, D. (2015). Historical analysis of Nature-Study and reinterpretation with modern perspectives : NABI (NAture-study Based Ideas) program as an implication. Doctoral dissertation, Kyungpook National University.
  34. Park, D., & Park, J. (2015a). Development and application of NABI(NAture-study Based Ideas) program for 'science education through nature'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 961-970.
  35. Park, D., & Park, J. (2016). Directions for character education in science education and a theoretical approach of Nature-Study in terms of character education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 581-589.
  36. Park, J., & Park, S. (2014). The formation process of Nature-Study in U. S. and its implication for science education. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 58(1), 118-125.
  37. Park, S. (2011). Development of humanity program based on ecological approach for adolescent. The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 19(1), 203-220.
  38. Park, S., & Huh, S. (2012). A study for development of the integrated humanity scale for adolescent. The Journal of Child Education, 21(3), 35-47.
  39. Park, S., & Park, J. (2015b). A study on educational methods of Nature-Study for science education through nature. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 59(1), 45-53.
  40. Ryu, C., & Jin, H. (2006). Analysis of character virtue factors for character education. The Journal of Education, 26(1), 139-166.
  41. Kang, S., Park, E., Kim, G., Song, S., Chung, Y., Kim, Y., & Ko, M. (2008). A foundational study for the vision of education for the human nature for 21st century. The Journal of Research in Education, 30, 1-38.
  42. Scott, C. B. (1900). Nature study and the child. Boston: D. C. Heath.
  43. Seo, Y. & Koh, M. (2013). A case study on character education applying project based learning. Korean Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(1), 49-77.
  44. Strauch-Nelson, W. (2012). Reuniting art and nature in the life of the child. Art Education, 65(3), 33-38.
  45. Wee, S., & Lim, S. (2013). Awareness and educational needs concerning SSI of Korean pre-service elementary teachers related to nuclear power plant accident. Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 294-309.
  46. Zeidler, D. L., Berkowitz, M. W., & Bennett, K. (2014). Thinking (scientifically) responsibly the cultivation of character in a global science education community. In Mueller, M. P., Tippins, D. J., & Stewart, A. J. (Eds), Assessing schools for generation R(responsibility): a guide for legislation and school policy in science education. (Chaps 7. pp 83-99). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  47. Seo, K., Choi, J., Noh. S., Kim, S., Lee, J., & Hyun S. (2013). The development and validation of teacher disposition assessment instruments. Journal of educational studies, 44(1), 147-176.