DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatial Distribution of the Population at Risk of Cholangiocarcinoma in Chum Phaung District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province of Thailand

Kaewpitoon, Soraya J;Rujirakul, Ratana;Loyd, Ryan A;Matrakool, Likit;Sangkudloa, Amnat;Kaewthani, Sarochinee;Khemplila, Kritsakorn;Eaksanti, Thawatchai;Phatisena, Tanida;Kujapun, Jirawoot;Norkaew, Jun;Joosiri, Apinya;Kaewpitoon, Natthawut

  • Published : 2016.03.07

Abstract

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a serious health problem in Thailand, particularly in northeastern and northern regions, but epidemiological studies are scarce and the spatial distribution of CCA remains to be determined. A database for the population at risk is required for monitoring, surveillance and organization of home health care. This study aim was to geo-visually display the distribution of CCA in northeast Thailand, using a geographic information system and Google Earth. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 9 sub-districts and 133 villages in Chum Phuang district, Nakhon Ratchasima province during June and October 2015. Data on demography, and the population at risk for CCA were combined with the points of villages, sub-district boundaries, district boundaries, and points of hospitals in districts, then fed into a geographical information system. After the conversion, all of the data were imported into Google Earth for geo-visualization. Results: A total of 11,960 from 83,096 population were included in this study. Females and male were 52.5%, and 47.8%, the age group 41-50 years old 33.3%. Individual risk for CCA was identifed and classified by using the Korat CCA verbal screening test as low (92.8%), followed by high risk (6.74%), and no (0.49%), respectively. Gender ($X^2$-test=1143.63, p-value= 0.001), age group ($X^2$-test==211.36, p-value=0.0001), and sub-district ($X^2$-test=1471.858, p-value=0.0001) were significantly associated with CCA risk. Spatial distribution of the population at risk for CCA in Chum Phuang district was viewed with Google Earth. Geo-visual display followed Layer 1: District, Layer 2: Sub-district, Layer 3: Number of low risk in village, Layer 4: Number of high risk in village, and Layer 5: Hospital in Chum Phuang District and their related catchment areas. Conclusions: We present the first risk geo-visual display of CCA in this rural community, which is important for spatial targeting of control efforts. Risk appears to be strongly associated with gender, age group, and sub-district. Therefor, spatial distribution is suitable for the use in the further monitoring, surveillance, and home health care for CCA.

Keywords

Spatial distribution;population at risk;cholangiocarcinoma;Nakhon Ratchasima;Thailand

References

  1. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Hashimoto D (2011). Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer: Advances and current limitations. World J Clin Oncol, 10, 94-107.
  2. Green A, Uttaravichien T, Bhudhisawasdi V, et al (1991). Cholangiocarcinoma in northeast Thailand. A hospital-based study. Trop Geogr Med, 43, 193-8.
  3. IARC. (1994). Infection with liver flukes (Opisthorchis viverrini, opisthorchis felineus and clonrochis sinensis). IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks of Hum, 61, 121-75.
  4. Kaewpitoon SJ, Rujirakul R, Kaewpitoon N (2012). Prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in Nakhon Ratchasima province, Northeast Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 5245-9. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.10.5245
  5. Landis S, Murray T, Bolden S, et al (1998). Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin, 48, 6-29. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.48.1.6
  6. Patel T (2002). Worldwide trends in mortality from biliary tract malignancies. BMC Cancer, 2, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-2-10
  7. Poomphakwaen K, Promthet S, Kamsa-ard S, et al (2009). Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in KhonKaen, Thailand: A nested case-control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 10, 251-7.
  8. Rattanasing W, Kaewpitoon SJ, Loyd RA, et al (2015). Utilization of google earth for distribution mapping of cholangiocarcinoma: a case study in satuek district, buriram, Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 5903-6. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.14.5903
  9. Rujirakul R, Ueng-arporn N, Kaewpitoon S, et al (2015). GISbased spatial statistical analysis of risk areas for liver flukes in Surin Province of Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 2323-6. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.6.2323
  10. Shin HR, Oh JK, Masuyer E, et al (2010). Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma: an update focusing on risk factors. Cancer Sci, 101, 579-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01458.x
  11. Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Sithithaworn P M, et al (2007). Liver fluke induces cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS Med, 4, 201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040201
  12. Sripa B, Pairojkul C (2008). Cholangiocarcinoma: lessons from Thailand. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 24, 349-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282fbf9b3
  13. Sripa B, Bethony JM, Sithithaworn P, et al (2011). Opisthorchiasis and opisthorchis-associated cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand and Laos. Acta Trop, 120, 158-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.07.006
  14. Thunyaharn N, Promthet S, Wiangnon S, et al (2013). Survival of cholangiocarcinoma patients in northeastern Thailand after supportive treatment. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 7029-32. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.14.11.7029

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Health Security Office of Nakhon Ratchasima province