Analysis of Research Trends on Korea's TRIZ

트리즈(TRIZ) 관련 국내 연구 동향 분석

  • Han, Jiyoung (Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Daejin University)
  • 한지영 (대진대학교 공학교육혁신센터)
  • Received : 2015.05.13
  • Accepted : 2016.01.22
  • Published : 2016.01.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify Korea's TRIZ research trends and to propose implications for setting a direction for future TRIZ research by analyzing TRIZ-related research over the past 15 years, or from 1998 to 2013. The subjects in this study were 256 published studies, including 149 studies in academic journals, 97 master theses, and 10 doctorate theses. This study reached the following conclusion. First, academic journals were the most frequent form of publication of TRIZ-related studies, followed by master's degree theses, and doctorate theses. Second, two or more TRIZ tools were used to solve problems and the most frequently used topic was technical contradiction as the result of frequency analysis for TRIZ research topics. This signified that it was easier to solve problems when various TRIZ tools were used, rather than applying a single TRIZ tool while technical contradiction was considered to be actively used as it allowed the relatively easy understanding of TRIZ. Third, the use of TRIZ research topics had increased and diversified each year. This could be interpreted to be based on the increased understanding of TRIZ. Fourth, case studies and experimental research were the most frequently used methods in TRIZ-related research. This was because various TRIZ tools were applied on problem solving situations, which were directly proposed as the research result. Fifth, the use of TRIZ was increasing in the educational field. Specifically, it was noted that TRIZ was used in creativity education with the use of 40 invention principles in elementary, middle, and high schools.

Keywords

TRIZ;research trend;creative problem solving method

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. 강병선, 최윤희, 오동환 역(2012). 트리즈. 서울; 두양사. Shpakovsky, N..Novitskaya, E. TRIZ. Target Invention Practice. 홍길동 (1996a). 공학교육, 공학교육출판사.
  2. 고홍화 외 역(1988). 사회행동과학 연구방법의 기초. 서울; 성원사.
  3. 김영민, 김현정, 이창훈, 김기수(2011). 특성화 고등학교 산학협동 관련 연구 동향 분석. 대한공업교육학회지, 36(1), 95-114.
  4. 김용익(2006). 초등 실과교과에 TRIZ 이론의 적용 가능성 탐색. 한국실과교육학회지, 19(1), 57-74.
  5. 남승권, 최완식(2006). 트리즈 40가지 발명 원리 적용이 학습자의 창의성 신장에 미치는 영향. 대한공업교육학회지, 31(2), 203-232.
  6. 노태천, 김영민, 최선미, 황민정(2013). '공학교육연구' 논문지의 공학교육 연구 동향 분석. 공학교육연구, 16(1), 45-53.
  7. 디지털타임스. 제조업'성장 패러다임'찾자. [Available online at: http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2015022602102251607002].
  8. 문대영(2006). 기술과 교육에서 TRIZ(창의적 문제해결 이론)의 적용 방안 탐색. 대한공업교육학회지, 31(2), 155-176.
  9. 장환영, 손지영, 하정례(2013). 학회지 분석을 통해 본 HRD 이슈와 동향 탐색. HRD연구, 15(2), 1-22.
  10. 박수진, 김태훈, 왕유진(2011). 국내 트리즈 연구 동향 분석. 실과교육연구, 17(2), 215-236.
  11. 이종신, 이영우 역(2007). 실제사례로 배우는 TRIZ/USIT. 서울; 광문각. 가스야 시계루 저. Fundamentals of TRIZ/USIT and practical cases.
  12. 이희주(2007). 초등학생을 위한 창의성 증진 프로그램 개발 및 효과분석. 초등교육연구, 20(2), 139-160.
  13. 임혜진(2012). 초등학생의 창의성 신장을 위한 TRIZ 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과 분석. 영재교육연구, 22(2), 467-482.
  14. 전자신문. 트리즈 문제해결 프로세스. [Available online at: http://www.etnews.com/20141112001208].
  15. 조승호, 정종완(2006). TRIZ(트리즈)를 활용한 발명교육프로그램 개발 연구. 대한공업교육학회지, 31(1), 86-109.
  16. 한경경제용어사전. 트리즈. [Available online at: http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=2066053&cid=42107&categoryId=42107].
  17. Cascini, G. et al.(2009). TETRIS: Teaching TRIZ at School. Education and Culture DG,
  18. G.S. Altshuller(1984). Creativity As an Exact Science; the theory of the solution of inventive problems. (A. Williams trans.). Gordon and Breach publishers.
  19. International Technology Education Association(2000). Standard for Technological Literacy : Content for the Study for technology. Technology for All American Project.