Case Study of Creative Merged Camp for non-Subject Program Development

비교과프로그램으로서의 창의·융합캠프 사례연구

  • Joo, Eun Sook (Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Gachon University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Soo (Department of Visual Design, Gachon University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung Hwan (Department of Electrical Engineering, Gachon University)
  • 주은숙 (가천대학교 공학교육혁신센터) ;
  • 김창수 (가천대학교 시각디자인학과) ;
  • 김경환 (가천대학교 전기공학과)
  • Received : 2015.12.07
  • Accepted : 2016.01.22
  • Published : 2016.01.30


This paper was built for an activation of a merged education and development of non-subject, new type creative merged education program having effectivities. This program is disciplined a kind of flipped learning and camp program of 2 nights and 3 days. Given a problem which big enough and open-ended problem, multidisciplinary team that composed with engineering and design major students works the capstone design project. For ordinary engineering design process, 'how can we make?' was important. But in this program 'what can we make?' is more serious question. Our program was pursuing an creative idea that can induce innovation. Teaching or interference of professors was minimized and then students solve the problem theirselves by long time and liberal brainstorming. Last products is not real goods and only a proposal for manufacturing. Finally, the results are presented using ppt and board. After not only professors but also students of other teams can ask a question, resolve and comment on that proposal. The benefits of this program are that inner members of university take a whole process from planning and working to last evaluation. Besides economic benefit, they can secure an infrastructure for development of creative merged education program by running for several times and so can improve the program continuously. For an aspect of students, they can respond to recently highlighted creative experiences that required for recruitment.


Engineering education;Capstone design;Non-subject educational program modeling;Creative experience


Supported by : 산업통상자원부


  1. 김상일 외(2012), KISTEP 10대 미래유망기술 선정에 관한 연구. 한국과학기술기획평가원
  2. 이시균, 중장기 인력수급 전망(2013-2023). 한국고용정보원
  3. 홍병선(2010), 융합교육 활성화를 통한 대학 교육경쟁력 강화방안 연구. 한국교육정책연구원 보고서
  4. 박기범.황정태(2009), 융합 연구의 형성과 발전 과정의 고찰을 통한 국내 연구 현황 분석. 과학기술정책연구원 보고서
  5. 경정운(2012), 정부의 역할이 융합연구효과에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구. 서울시립대학교 박사학위 논문
  6. Lattuca, L. R.(2001), Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty, Nashville. Vanderbilt University Press
  7. 진성희.신수봉(2013), 공과대학 융합교육에 대한 사례조사 및 요구분석. 공학교육연구, 16(6) : 29-37
  8. 신동주.김학진(2012), 고등교육에서 정부의 융합교육 정책방향 : 공학계열 중심으로. 한국정책학회 하계학술발표논문집, 2012(0) : 443-460
  9. 박미경(2012), 공학도를 위한 융합교육의 방향. 공학교육, 19(1): 15-17
  10. Bates, S. and Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study. In Proceedings of the Higher Education Academy STEM conference, London, UK.
  11. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L. and Ball, N. (2013), Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61 : 563-583
  12. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134 : 223-246
  13. 최정빈 외(2015). 공과대학의 Flipped Learning 교수학습 모형 개발 및 교과운영사례. 공학교육연구, 18(2): 77-88