A clinical case of hybrid telescopic double crown using friction pin with an isolated few remaining teeth

고립된 소수 잔존치 환자에서 프릭션핀을 이용한 하이브리드 텔레스코픽 이중관 국소의치의 임상증례

  • Sohn, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyoungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyoungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Am (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyoungpook National University)
  • 손상혁 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조진현 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조성암 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2015.10.08
  • Accepted : 2016.03.17
  • Published : 2016.03.31


A few authors have reported good clinical results using double crown removable partial denture (RPD) with a few remaining teeth. Hybrid telescopic double crown is a good indication for a patient with poor periodontal condition and/or few remaining teeth after extraction, especially located in cross-arch position. In this case, there was a poor periodontal condition with teeth mobility. Several teeth with poor prognosis were extracted. Remaining anterior teeth was restored with fixed prostheses and edentulism was restored with Kennedy class I removable partial denture in maxilla. In mandible, it was hard to restore with clasp removable partial prostheses because of bilaterally isolated remaining teeth so that hybrid double crown removable partial denture with friction pin was suitable for this case. The objective of this report is to discuss the characteristics and the utility of hybrid double crown prostheses using a few remaining teeth in mandible.


bilaterally isolated few remaining teeth;double crown removable partial denture;friction pin


  1. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
  2. Koller B, Att W, Strub JR. Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:109-17.
  3. Berman B, Ericson A, Molin M. Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:533-38.
  4. Isaacson GO. Telescope crown retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:436-48.
  5. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K, Lehmann KM. Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:207-13.
  6. Jo LJ. Spark erosion process: An overview. J Dent Implant 2011;1:2-6.
  7. Ha SJ, Lee CH, Cho JH. Periodontal prosthesis on medically compromised patient with few remaining teeth: hybrid telescopic double crown with friction pin method. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2014;52:359-65.
  8. Widbon T, Lofquist L, Widbom C, Soberfeldt B, Kronstrom M. Tooth-supported telescopic crownretained dentures: an up to 9-year restrospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:29-34.
  9. Verma R, Joda T, Bragger U, Wittneben JG. A systemic review of clinical performance of toothretained and implant-retained double crown prostheses with a follow-up of $\geq$3 years. J Prosthodont 2013;22:2-12.
  10. Sigh K, Gupta N. Telescopic denture - A treatment modality for minimizing the conventional removable complete denture problems: A case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2012;6:1112-6.
  11. Saito M, Miura Y, Notani K, Kawasaki T. Stress distribution of abutments and base displacement with precision attachment- and telescopic crownretained removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:482-7.
  12. Sahin V, Akaltan F, Parnas L. Effects of the type and rigidity of the retainer and the number of abutting teeth on stress distribution of telescopicretained removable partial dentures. J Dent Sci 2012;7:7-13.