Improvement through Analysis of Current Open Book Policy for the Korean CM at Risk

국내 시공책임형 CM 오픈북 정책 현황 분석을 통한 개선방안

  • Received : 2015.09.30
  • Accepted : 2016.01.29
  • Published : 2016.03.31


CM at Risk has been introduced in Korea to keep up with the global standards of construction management and provide a higher quality of cm service in line with a rapid change of the construction industry recently. However, it is widely considered that more time would required to settle down the system due to a lack of understanding towards CM at Risk, shortage of reliability and low capability to manage and undertake CM at Risk. Therefore, this research is analyzed problems of contract types, open book policies, and contract conditions of 33 numbers of projects undertaken by a bespoke domestic construction management firm in this research. Moreover, this research is suggested a method to establish an open book policy of CM at Risk aiming a better customers satisfaction through staff training, simplifying and improving a payment system, and a way to settle down an open book policy by improving a performance management system on site. It's expected that this research will contribute to a more competitive system with more dominating the market and a differentiation of the service so as clients to rely more on the CM at Risk.


CM at Risk;Open book policy;Customer satisfaction;Customers atisfaction investigation


  1. ENR. (2015). "The Top 100 CM at Risk." ENR, RS. Means, (Aug. 4, 2015).
  2. Kim, E. J., and Yu, I. H. (2015). "Suggestions to Improve the System for Introducing CM at risk system of Specialty Construction Contractors." Korean Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 17(2), pp. 129-138.
  3. Kim, E. J. (2014). "Suggestions to Strengthen Competitive Power of Domestic Specialty Construction Contractors by Activating CM at Risk." Korean Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 16(5), pp. 207-215.
  4. Kim, J. G., Jung, J. H, and Lee, H. K., (2009). "The Corresponding Plan of Construction Enterprises for the Introduction of CM at Risk." Korean Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 11(1), pp. 159-167.
  5. Koh, M.H., Kim, Y.S, Kwon, S.W, and Chin, S.Y. (2010). "Feasibility Analysis of Introducing CM at Risk Delivery Method to the Korea Public Construction Industry by Analyzing Attributes of the Projects," Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 11(2), pp. 3-12.
  6. Ministry of Land infrastructure and Transport(Molit). (2015) "Domestic Construction Management Capability in 2015. (Aug. 31, 2015).
  7. Park, K., Lee, H.W., and Kim, C. (2014). "Assessment of risk management practices of CM enterprises: The need for an enterprise-level risk management framework." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 15(3), pp. 66-73.
  8. Yoo, S.K., and Kim, J.J. (2009). "A Current Status Study in the Introduction of CM at Risk on the Domestic Major Construction Company." Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 9(1), pp. 5-9.
  9. Yoo, S. K, Choi, S. I., and Son, C. B. (2009). "An Analysis of Capability of CM at Risk in Major Construction Company." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(5), pp. 85-95.


Supported by : 한국연구재단