Experimental study on seismic performances of steel framebent structures

  • Liang, Jiongfeng (Faculty of Civil & Architecture Engineering, East China Institute of Technology) ;
  • Gu, Lian S. (Faculty of Civil & Architecture Engineering, East China Institute of Technology) ;
  • Hu, Ming H. (Faculty of Civil & Architecture Engineering, East China Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2015.07.23
  • Accepted : 2016.02.29
  • Published : 2016.05.25


To study seismic performance of steel frame-bent structure, one specimen with one-tenth scale, three-bay, and five-story was tested under reversed cyclic lateral load. The entire loading process and failure mode were observed, and the seismic performance indexes including hysteretic loops, skeleton curve, ductility, load bearing capacity, drift ratio, energy dissipation capacity and stiffness degradation were analyzed. The results show that the steel frame-bent structure has good seismic performance. And the ductility and the energy dissipation capacity were good, the hysteresis loops were in spindle shape, which shape were full and had larger area. The ultimate elastic-plastic drift ratio is larger than the limit value specified by seismic code, showing the high capacity of collapse resistance. It can be helpful to design this kind of structure in high-risk seismic zone.



Supported by : Chinese National Natural Science Foundation


  1. Banihashemi, M.R., Mirzagoltabar, A.R. and Tavakoli, H.R. (2015), "Development of the performance based plastic design for steel moment resistant frame", Int. J. Steel. Struct., 15(1), 51-62.
  2. Code for design of steel structures(GB50017-2003) (2003), Beijing. (in Chinese)
  3. Code for seismic design of building(GB50011-2010) (2010), Beijing. (in Chinese)
  4. D'Aniello, M., Costanzo, S. and Landolfo, R. (2015), "The influence of beam stiffness on seismic response of chevron concentric bracings", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 112, 305-324.
  5. Dimopoulos, A.I., Bazeos, N. and Beskos, D.E. (2012), "Seismic yield displacements of plane moment resisting and x-braced steel frames", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 41, 128-140
  6. Grande, E. and Rasulo, A. (2015), "A simple approach for seismic retrofit of low-rise concentric X-braced steel frames", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 107, 162-172
  7. Grande, E. and Rasulo, A. (2013), "Seismic assessment of concentric X-braced steel frames", Eng. Struct., 49, 983-995.
  8. Hassanien Serror, M., Adel diab, R. and Ahmed Mourad, S. (2014), "Seismic force reduction factor for steel moment resisting frames with supplemental viscous dampers", Earthq. Struct., 7(6), 1171-1186.
  9. Hosseinzadeh. Sh. and Mohebi, B. (2016), "Seismic evaluation of all-steel buckling restrained braces using finite element analysis", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 119, 76-84.
  10. Hoveidae, N., Tremblay, R., Rafezy, B. and Davaran, A. (2015), "Numerical investigation of seismic behavior of short-core all-steel buckling restrained braces", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 114, 89-99
  11. Hsu, H.L. and Li, Z.C. (2015), "Seismic performance of steel frames with controlled buckling mechanisms in knee braces", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 107, 50-60.
  12. Kamaris, G.S., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. and Beskos, D.E. (2015), "Direct damage controlled seismic design of plane steel degrading frames", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(2), 587-612.
  13. Lin, Y.C., Sause, R. and Ricles, J.M. (2013), "Seismic performance of steel self-centering, moment-resisting frame: Hybrid simulations under design basis earthquake", J. Struct. Eng., 139(11), 1823-1832.
  14. Lubliner, J. (2006), Plasticity Theory, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
  15. Metelli, G. (2013), "Theoretical and experimental study on the cyclic behaviour of X braced steel frames", Eng. Struct., 46, 763-773.
  16. Ministry of Construction. Specificating of testing methods for earthquake resistant building (JGJ101-96) (1997), Beijing. (in Chinese)
  17. Nguyen, P.C. and Kim, S.E. (2014), "Nonlinear inelastic time-history analysis of three-dimensional semi-rigid steel frames", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 101, 192-206.
  18. Piedrafita, D., Maimi, P. and Cahis, X. (2015), "A constitutive model for a novel modular all-steel buckling restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 100(1), 326-331.
  19. Pollino, M. (2015), "Seismic design for enhanced building performance using rocking steel braced frames", Eng. Struct., 83(15), 129-139.
  20. Salawdeh, S. and Goggins, J. (2013), "Numerical simulation for steel brace members incorporating a fatigue model", Eng. Struct., 46, 332-349.
  21. Stamatopoulos, G.N. (2014), "Seismic response of steel frames considering the hysteretic behaviour of the semi-rigid supports", Int.J. Steel. Struct., 14(3), 609-618.
  22. Tenchini, A., D'Aniello, M., Rebelo, C., Landolfo, R., Silva, L.S. and Lima, L. (2014), "Seismic performance of dual-steel moment resisting frames", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 101, 437-454.
  23. Zahrai, S.M. and Jalali, M. (2014), "Experimental and analytical investigations on seismic behavior of ductile steel knee braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 16(1), 1-21.

Cited by

  1. Study on the Seismic Performance of Bent Columns in Vertical Bent Frame Structures vol.23, pp.6, 2016,