DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Membrane Module and Feed Flow Configuration on Performance in Pressure Retarded Osmosis

압력지연삼투(PRO) 공정에서 막 모듈 배치와 유입원수의 유입 흐름방식이 성능에 미치는 영향

Go, Gilhyun;Kim, Donghyun;Park, Taeshin;Kang, Limseok
고길현;김동현;박태신;강임석

  • Received : 2016.04.19
  • Accepted : 2016.05.23
  • Published : 2016.06.01

Abstract

Recently, reverse osmosis (RO) is the most common process for seawater desalination. A common problem in both RO and thermal processes is the high energy requirements for seawater desalination. The one energy saving method when utilizing the osmotic power is utilizing pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process. The PRO process can be used to operate hydro turbines for electrical power production or can be used directly to supplement the energy required for RO desalination system. This study was carried out to evaluate the performance of both single-stage PRO process and two-stage PRO process using RO concentrate for a draw solution and RO permeate for a feed solution. The major results, were found that increase of the draw and feed solution flowrate lead to increase of the production of power density and water permeate. Also, comparison between CDCF and CDDF configuration showed that the CDDF was better than CDCF for stable operation of PRO process. In addition, power density of two-stage PRO was lower than the one of single-stage. However, net power of two-stage PRO was higher than the one of single-stage PRO.

Keywords

Net power;Power density;Pressure retarded osmosis;SWRO-PRO;Two-stage PRO

References

  1. Achilli A., Cath T. Y. and Childress A. E. (2009) Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation, J. Membr. Sci., 343, 42-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.006
  2. Altaee Ali, Guillermo Zaragoza, Adel Sharif (2014) Pressure retarded osmosis for power generation and seawater desalination: performance analysis, Desalination, 355, 108-115
  3. Chou S., Wang R., Shi L., Fu Q.S.A., Nie S.Z. (2012) Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process with high power density, J. Membr. Sci., 389, 25-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.002
  4. Gray G., McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. (2006) Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation, Desalination, 197, 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.003
  5. Gruber M.F., Johnson C.J., Tang C.Y., Jensen M.H., Yde L., Helix-Nielsen C. (2011) Computational fluid dynamics simulations of flow and concentration polarization in forward osmosis membrane systems, J. Membr. Sci, 379, 488-495 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.022
  6. He W, Wang Y, Mohammad H.S. (2015) Enhanced energy generation and membrane performance by two-stage pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), Desalination, 359, 186-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.014
  7. Hong S.K., Lee S.H., Kim J.H. and Ju Y.G. (2011) Evolution of RO Process for Green Future, Kor. Ind. Chem. News, 14(6), 9-20
  8. Jellinek H.H.G., Masuda H. (1981) Theory and performance of an osmotic-power pilot plant, Ocean Eng., 8, 103-128 https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(81)90022-6
  9. Kim J., Kim S.H., Kim J.H. (2014) Pressure Retarded Osmosis Process: Current Status and Future. J. Kor. Soc. Environ. Eng., 36(11), 791-802 https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2014.36.11.791
  10. Kim Y.C., Kim Y., Oh D., and Lee K.H. (2013) Experimental Investigation of a Spiral-wound Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Membrane Module for Osmotic Power Generation, Env. Sci. Tech., 47, 2966-2973 https://doi.org/10.1021/es304060d
  11. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. (1981) Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis, J. Membr. Sci., 8, 141-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82088-8
  12. Lee S.H., Choi J.S., Hwang T.M. (2013) [Q&A]What Can We Expect on the Next Generation Desalination Technology in the Future Civil and Environmental Engineering?, Kor. Soc. of Civil eng., 61(5), 102-107
  13. Loeb S. (1975) Osmotic power plants, Science, 189, 654-655 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4203.654
  14. Loeb S. (1976) Production of energy from concentrated brines by pressure retarded osmosis: I. Preliminary technical and economic correlations. J. Membr. Sci. 1(1), 49-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82257-7
  15. Loeb S. (2002) Large-scale power production by pressure-retarded osmosis, using river water and sea water passing through spiral modules. Desalination, 143(2), 115-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00233-3
  16. Loeb S., Mehta G.D. (1978) A two-coefficient water transport equation for pressure retarded osmosis, J. Membr. Sci., 4, 351-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83313-X
  17. McGinnis R.L. and Elimelech M. (2007) Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination, Desalination, 207(1-3), 370-382 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.08.012
  18. Mehta G.D., Loeb S. (1978) Internal polarization in the porous substructure of a semipermeable membrane under pressure-retarded osmosis, J. Membr. Sci., 4, 261-265 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83301-3
  19. Pattle R.E. (1954) Production of electric power by mixing fresh and salt water in the hydroelectric pile, Nature, 174, 660 https://doi.org/10.1038/174660a0
  20. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. (2008) Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations, J. Membr. Sci., 324, 209-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.020
  21. Yip N.Y. and Elimelech M. (2011) Performance limitin effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(23), 10273-10282 https://doi.org/10.1021/es203197e

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국토교통부