Study on The Preparation and Mechanical Properties of Fiberglass Reinforced Wood-Based Composite

  • Zhang, Yang (Forestry and Woodworking Machinery Engineering Centre, Northeast Forestry University) ;
  • Ma, Yan (Forestry and Woodworking Machinery Engineering Centre, Northeast Forestry University)
  • Received : 2016.02.26
  • Accepted : 2016.04.23
  • Published : 2016.07.25


To study mechanical properties of fiberglass reinforced wood-based composite (FRWC), fiberglass with a diameter of $20{\mu}m$ was selected to prepare test specimens. Mechanical properties of fiberglass reinforced wood-based composite were determined by three-point-bending test while its microstructure was characterizes by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that mechanical properties of fiberglass reinforced wood-based composite were superior to that of the wood fiberboard based on the contrasting mechanical curves and the analysis of fracture mechanism. It is believed that the material design with this "sandwich" structure brings a unique buffering capacity of fiberglass into play in the composites. So the specimen did not produce a sudden fracture failure at high level of applied loads because it had a bearing ability. The SEM analysis showed that the working strength of PVAc adhesive was high; under a bearing force, it could properly transfer a load. In addition, glass fiber mesh and wood fiber board combined well.


fiberglass;composite materials;wood fiberboard;mechanical properties


Supported by : National Natural Science Found


  1. Bashar, M.T., Sundararaj, U., Mertiny, P. 2013. Mode-I interlaminar fracture behaviour of nanoparticle modified epoxy/basalt fibre-reinforced laminates. Polymer Testing 32(2): 402-412.
  2. Thomason, J.L., Vlug, M.A. 1996. Influence of fibre length and concentration on the Properties of glass fibre-reinforced polypropylene: 1. Tensile and flexural modulus. Composites A 27(1): 477-484.
  3. Lu, G.H., Li, X.T. 1996. Electrical properties and shielding effects (by theoretical calculation) for larbon fibers/abs resin composites mixed by three different ways. Composites and Technology 12(56): 193-199.
  4. Ma, Y. 1995. The exploration on analytical method of micromechanics model and rigidity parameters of Scrimber. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 23(4): 107-111.
  5. Ma, Y. 2002. Study on quantitatively calculated theory of micro-meter wood fiber directional reconstituted content of cell fiber. Journal of Biomathematics 17(3): 353-357.
  6. Ma, Y. 2003. Study on cell break theory of using wood fiber micro-meter aligned reconstituted technology forming super High-intensity Wood-based Panel. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 39(3): 111-115.
  7. Molgaard, C. 2005. Environmental impacts by dis posal of plastic from municipal solid waste. Resources Conservation and Recycling 15(2): 51-63.
  8. Norman, D.A., Robertson, R.E. 2003. The effect of fiber orientation on the toughening of short fiber-reinforced polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 90(10): 2740-2751.
  9. Pedroso, A.G., Rosa, D.S. 2005. Mechanical, thermal and morphological characterization of recycled LDPE/corn starch blends. Carbohydrate Polymers 59(5): 1-9.
  10. Peijs, T., Garkhail, S., Heijenrath, R., Vanden Oever, M., Bos, H. 1998. Thermoplastic composites based on flax fibre and polypropylene: Influence of fibre length and fibre volume fraction on mechanical properties. Macromolecular Symposia 127(3): 193-203.
  11. Shen, G. L., Hu, G.K. 2006. Compound material mechanics. Tsinghua university press, Beijing, CHN.
  12. Simonsen, J. 1996. Utilizing straw as a filler in thermoplastic building materials. Construction and Building Materials 10(1): 435-440.
  13. Evans, K.E., Gibson, A.G. 1986. Prediction of the maximum packing fraction achievable in randomly oriented short-fibre composites. Composite Science Technology 25(2): 149-162.
  14. Al-Salem, S.M., Lettieri, P., Baeyens, J. 2009. Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): a review. Waste Management (Oxford) 29(3): 2625-2643.
  15. Biot, M.A. 1996. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. I. Low frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28(2): 168-178.
  16. Guo, M. 2006. MorPhology controlling and properties of polyporpylenel/glass fiber composites obtainedvia shear sterss field. Ph.D. Thesis, Sichuang University, CHN.
  17. Guo, M., Yang, H., Tan, H., Wang, C., Zhang, Q., Du, R. 2006. Shear enhanced fiber orientation and adhesion in PP/glass fiber composites. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 291(3): 239-246.
  18. Hull, D., Clyne, T.W. 1996. An introduction to composite material, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, UK.
  19. Jain, L.K., Wetherhold, R.C. 1992. Effect of fiber prientation on the fracture toughness of brittle matrix composites, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 40(6): 1135-1143.
  20. Lee, C.F., Sue, H.J., Fiscus, D.M. 2013. Refined fixture design for effective essential work of fracture toughness characterization of m-LLDPE thin films. Polymer Testing 32(2): 256-264.
  21. Christensen, R.M., Waals, F.M. 1972. Effective stiffness of randomly oriented fibre composites. Journal of Composite Materials 6: 518-532.
  22. Denneulin, S., Viot, P., Leonardi, F., Lataillade, J.L. 2012. The influence of acrylate triblock copolymer embedded in matrix on composite structures' responses to lowvelocity impacts. Composite Structures 94(5): 1471-1481.