Development and Evaluation of Potential Flood Damage Index for Public Facilities

공공시설물 잠재홍수피해지수 체계 개발 및 평가

  • Received : 2016.07.07
  • Accepted : 2016.07.28
  • Published : 2016.07.31


Since public facilities have high property values and are directly exposed to the flood hazard, they account for the highest share of disaster damages compared to other assets such as housing, industry, vehicle and agriculture in case of floods. Therefore, this study was conducted to develop and suggest the potential flood damage index for public facilities to evaluate potential flood damage of specific local government directly or indirectly as a tool for decision-making related to flood prevention, maintenance, management, and budget allocation. The flood damage assessment system proposed in this study was evaluated in 231 local governments nationwide. Evaluation results showed that higher values were obtained in Seoul metropolitan government, Gyeonggi-do (province), coastal areas in Gyeongsangnam-do (province), and Jeju island.


Potential flood damage index;Flood damage;Public facilities


  1. An, J. H., D. S. Gang, Y. N. Yun, 2007. A study on the improvement of potential flood damage estimate, Magazine of Korea water resources association, 40(11): 42-49 (in Korean).
  2. Adhikari Y., Yoshitani J. 2009. Global trends in water-related disasters: An insight for policy makers, The United Nations World Water Assessment Programme, UNESCO, France.
  3. Aall, C. 2005. The concept of indicators, Paper Presented at a Seminar Within the EU Project Capacity Building to Enable the Incorporation of Urban Sustainability Parameters in Spatial Urban Development and Planning Policy Practices Through the Use of Indicators (URBANGUARD). Nicosia. Cyprus. 8-9 August 2005.
  4. Birkmann, J. 2006. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies, United Nation University.
  5. Baeck, S. H., S. J. Choi, G. W. Choi, and D. R. Lee, 2014. A study of evaluating and forecasting watersheds using the flood vulnerability assessment index in Korea, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 5(3): 208-231.
  6. Connor, R. F. and Hiroki K. 2005, Development of a method for assessing flood vulnerability, Water Science & Technology, 51(5): 61-67.
  7. Cho, H. J., K. B. Kim, 2015. Assessment of the social vulnerability in the climate change induced - flood risk : focused on the city of Incheon. Journal of climate research 10(4): 341-354 (in Korean).
  8. Jang, D. W. 2010. Development and application of risk management index for selective flood prevention alternatives, Ph.D. Dissertation, Inha university, Incheon, Korea (in Korean).
  9. Kim, G. H. 2013. A study on estimation of flood damage and development of flood damage index on public facilities, Ph.D. Dissertation, Inha university, Incheon, Korea (in Korean).
  10. Kim, J. H., and Y. H. Kim, 2003. Improving potential flood damage, Proceedings of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers Conference 2003, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 2373-2378 (in Korean).
  11. Kang, M. G., C. Y. Jung, and G. M. Lee, 2007. Extraction of primary factors influencing dam operation using factor analysis, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 40(10): 769-781 (in Korean).
  12. Kang, J. E., M. J. Lee, 2012. Assessment of flood vulnerability to climate change using fuzzy model and GIS in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 15(3): 119-136 (in Korean).
  13. Kwon, J. N., J. G. Kim, and S. J. You, 2000. Characteristics of water quality and factor analysis on the variations of water quality in coastal sea around the Keum River estuary in Summer, Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environment & Energy, 3(4): 3-22 (in Korean).
  14. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT). 2004. Development of watershed assessment techniques for heathy water cycle (in Korean).
  15. Lee, M. H., I. W. Jung, and D. H. Bae, 2011. Korean flood vulnerability assessment on climate change. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 44(8): 653-666 (in Korean).
  16. Lee, Y. J. 2002. Factor analysis, Sukjung (in Korean).
  17. Lim, K. S., Choi, S. J., Lee, D. R. and Moon J. W. 2010. Development of flood risk index using causal relationships of flood indicators, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers B, 30(1B): 61-70 (in Korean).
  18. Nardo, M., M, Saisana, A. Saltelli, S. Tarantila, A. Hoffman, and E. Giovannini, 2005. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide, OECD Statistics Working Papers, OECD, Italy.
  19. Maclaren, V. W. 1996, Urban sustainability reporting, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2): 184-203.
  20. Ologunorisa, E. T. 2004, An assessment of flood vulnerability zones in the Niger Delta, International journal of environmental studies 61(1): 31-38.
  21. Park, T. S., G. M. Kim, Y. S. Yoon, and S. B. Lee, 2005. Analysis of Flood Damage Characteristics and Development of Flood Damage Index, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 2005-6 (in Korean).
  22. Rim, C. S. and J. K. Shin, 2002. cluster and factor analyses using water quality data in the Sapkyo reservoir watershed, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 35(2): 149-159 (in Korean).
  23. Tapsell, E. C., Penning-Rowsell, Tunstall, S. M. and Wilson, T. L. 2002. Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions, Philosophical. Transactions of the Royal Society of London-Series, A 360: 1511-1525.
  24. United Nations Development Programme(UNDP). 2004. Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development, UNDP, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New York.


Supported by : 국토교통과학기술진흥원