Analysis of the Relationship between CSR Activity and Purchase Motivation

  • Nakamura, Yoshiki (Department of Business Administration, Aoyama Gakuin University)
  • Received : 2016.06.22
  • Accepted : 2016.09.05
  • Published : 2016.09.30


Companies have developed a keen interest in bolstering their CSR activities. Especially in Japan, CSR is strongly associated with social contribution and $m{\acute{e}}c{\acute{e}}nat$ activities. On the other hand, the primary purpose of companies is to provide their products and services to consumers and thereby return value to their shareholders through sales and profits. It is, however, difficult to estimate directly the relationship between CSR and sales/profits. This study focuses particularly on CSR activities related to environmental and consumer issues and community involvement and development. It is also analyzed the relationship between the degree of CSR empathy and product purchase motivation. For accomplishment the purpose, a questionnaire is designed that elicits the respondent's degree of purchase intention and empathy toward CSR activities supported through sales. The object industry for questionnaires is TV maker. For results of the questionnaire, a covariance structure analysis is conducted to understand potential relationships among CSR activities, sales, and disposable budget. Through this study, it is able to clear the relationship between CSR activities and sales/profits. It is one of the advice to future prospect, strategy and CSR concept for the companies.


CSR;ISO26000;Data Analysis;Covariance Structure Analysis


  1. Alexander, A., Francis, A., Kyire, L. A., and Mohammed, H. (2014), The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Building, International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6, 126-134.
  2. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., and Hill, R. P. (2006), The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior, Journal of Business Research, 59, 46-53.
  3. Bernhart M. S. and Maher, F. J. S. (2011), ISO 26000 in Practice: A User Guide Paperback, Quality Press.
  4. Blunch, N. J. (2013), Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Using IBM SPSS Statistics and Amos 2nd ed. Edition, SAGE Publications.
  5. Boonpattarakan, A. (2012), An Experimental Design to Test the Main and Interaction Effects of CSR Involvement, Brand Naming and Pricing on Purchase Intentions in Thailand, International Journal of Business and Management, 7, 62-79.
  6. Brown, T. J. and Dacin, P. A. (1997), The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses, Journal of Marketing, 61, 68-84.
  7. Carroll, A. B. and Shabana, K. M. (2010), The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 85-105.
  8. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. (1991), Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319.
  9. Drumwright, M. E. (1994), Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion, Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-19.
  10. Francesco Perrini, F., Russo, A., and Tencati, A. (2007), CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms, Evidence from Italy, Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 285-300.
  11. Gatignon, H. (2014), Statistical Analysis of Management Data 3rd ed. 2014 Edition, Springer.
  12. Graafland, J. and Ven, B. (2006), Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 111-123.
  13. Keidanren (2015), Summary of the Survey on Corporate Philanthropic Activities in Fiscal 2014, (Accessed 15 June 2016).
  14. Lee, K. and Shin, D. (2010), Consumers' Responses to CSR Activities: The Linkage between Increased Awareness and Purchase Intention, Public Relations Review, 36, 193-195.
  15. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., and Hult, G. T. M. (1999), Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455-469.
  16. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., and Harris, K. E. (2001), Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45-72.
  17. Peloza, J. and Hassay, D. (2008), Make versus Buy Philanthropy: Managing Firm-Cause Relationships for Strategic and Social Benefit, Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 19, 69-90.
  18. Pivato, S., Misani, N., and Tencati, A. (2008), The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Trust: The Case of Organic Food, Business Ethics, A European Review, 17, 3-12.
  19. Ross III, J. K., Stutts, M. A., and Patterson, L. (1991), Tactical Considerations for the Effective Use of Cause-Related Marketing, Journal of Applied Business Research, 7, 58-65.
  20. Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L. L. (2000), Consumer Behavior, Prentice Hall.
  21. Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001), Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 25-243.
  22. Tibbett L. S. (1997), Growing the Green Market, Americun Demogruphics, 19, 45-49.
  23. Wu, S. and Wang, W. (2014), Impact of CSR Perception on Brand Image, Brand Attitude and Buying Willingness: A Study of a Global Cafe, International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6, 43-56.
  24. Weber, M. (2008), The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR, European Management Journal, 26, 247-26.