DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Causes of Decrease in the Number of Students Taking Chemistry I in the CSAT by Analyzing the Chemistry I Question in the CSAT and the Recognition Survey of Students and Teachers

대학수학능력시험 화학 I 문항 분석 및 학생과 교사의 인식 조사를 통한 화학 I 응시자 감소 원인 분석

  • Received : 2017.08.18
  • Accepted : 2017.10.31
  • Published : 2017.12.20

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the causes of decrease in the number of students taking Chemistry ? in the College Scholastics Ability Test (CSAT) by analyzing the adequacy of the Chemistry I question in the CSAT and the recognition survey of students and teachers about the Chemistry I choice. We analyzed some questions in Chemistry I of the CSAT from the year 2014 to 2016. The questions were analyzed to determine whether they were appropriate to the curriculum content, achievement standard, and achievement level. The target of the survey for perception was 452 senior high school students and 68 science teachers. The result of the study showed that the questions in Chemistry I are somewhat difficult compared to the depth and achievement level required by the curriculum, and it also requires mathematical thinking ability. Students recognized the mathematical thinking and complex mathematical skills are needed to solve problems in Chemistry I. Teachers also thought that the choice of Chemistry I is unfavorable in aspect of meeting the minimum academic ability standard, and accordingly, they did not actively recommend students to take Chemistry I. Moreover, most of the teachers recognized that it is necessary to improve the direction of writing questions for Chemistry I. Therefore, setting questions that can be solved using chemical knowledge, not mathematical ability need to be addressed.

Keywords

College Scholastics Ability Test (CSAT);Chemistry I;question analysis;recognition survey;decrease in the number of students taking Chemistry I

References

  1. Lee, J. S.; Park, D. S.; Lee, J. J.; Nam, M. H.; Kim, H. W.; Kim, J. K.; Paik, S. K. A Study on Reformation of CSAT KICE.KEDI Collaborative Research Reports 2004. Research data RR2004-15.
  2. Kim, S. Y. J. Edu. Eval. 2009, 22, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790903101469
  3. Nam, M. H. J. Edu. Eval. 2005, 18, 17.
  4. Choi, S. H.; Kim, E. S.; Kwon, O. K.; Oh, C. H.; Park, K. T. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2008, 52, 96. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2008.52.1.096
  5. Hong, M. Y. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2006, 50, 394. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.5.394
  6. Yoo, M. H.; Sin, D. H. J. Res. Curriculum & Instr. 2013, 17, 595. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.2.595
  7. Sim, J. H.; Park, H. J.; Lee, J. K. J. Sci. Edu. 2015, 39, 133. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.2.133
  8. Hong, M. Y.; Jeon, K. M.; Lee, B. H.; Lee, Y. R. J. Kor. Assoc. Sci. Edu. 2002, 22, 204.
  9. Hong, M. Y.; Jeon, K. M.; Lee, Y. R.; Lee, B. H. J. Kor. Assoc. Sci. Edu. 2002, 22, 378.
  10. Kim, H. K. Sch. Sci. J. 2015, 9, 94.
  11. Kim, H. K. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 54, 818. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2010.54.6.818
  12. Kim, H. K. J. Kor. Assoc. Sci. Edu. 2011, 31, 1158.
  13. Yang, J. K. An Analysis of the Reluctance to Select Physics I among High School Students in the Science and Engineering Course After the 2009 Revised National Curriculum. Master Dissertation. Inha University, Incheon, Korea, 2016.
  14. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. Science Curriculum; Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Announcement 2011-361 (Suppl. 9), 2011.
  15. Kook, D. S.; Lee, S. G. J. Kor. Earth Sci. Soc. 2005, 26, 771.
  16. Joun, S. Y. A comparative analysis of the Curriculum Revision 2009 with the Curriculum Revision 2007: Focusing on the high school Chemistry I. Master Dissertation. Pukyung University, Busan, Korea, 2013.
  17. Chiu, M.-H. Proceedings of the Nat'l Sci. Council, Repub. of China Math., Sci. and Tech. Edu., 2001, 11, 20.
  18. Zoller, U.; Dori, Y. J.; Lubezky. A. Internatl. J. Sci. Edu. 2002, 24, 185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049060