Treatment of the cleft lip and palate patient with few remaining posterior teeth using hybrid telescopic crown denture

치주질환에 이환된 소수 잔존치를 가지는 구순구개열 환자에서의 상악 혼성 이중관 의치를 이용한 수복증례

  • Park, Jin-Wook (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 박진욱 (경북대학교 치과병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 조진현 (경북대학교 치과병원 치과보철과)
  • Received : 2017.08.24
  • Accepted : 2017.09.20
  • Published : 2017.12.30


For individuals with cleft lip and palate, the removable partial dentures (RPDs) have been an important treatment option. Some modifications from conventional prosthetic treatment may be necessary to achieve satisfactory functional and esthetic results in cleft patients. In case of cleft palate patient with periodontally compromised and only posterior few remaining teeth, removable partial prosthesis connected to telescopic crown can be the alternative treatment option. When connected to the RPD, telescopic crowns increase the prosthetic stability and retention, optimize favorable force transmission to the long dental axis, and improve esthetics. And the cross arch stabilization of double crown denture helps to stabilize both divided maxillary ridges in CLP patient. This case present one adult CLP patient using an RPD connected with hybrid telescopic crowns with friction pins to improve not only retention and stability but also aesthetics.


Supported by : Kyungpook National University


  1. Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:167-78.
  2. Palmeiro MR, Piffer CS, Brunetto VM, Maccari PC, Shinkai RS. Maxillary rehabilitation using a removable partial denture with attachments in a cleft lip and palate patient: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 2015;24:250-3.
  3. Balkaya MC, Sultan H, Erdem S, Mutlu D. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a unilateral cleft palate: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111:269-72.
  4. Bishara SE, de Arrendondo RS, Vales HP, Jakobsen JR. Dentofacial relationships in persons with unoperated clefts: comparison between three cleft types. Am J Orthod 1985;87:481-507.
  5. Oiler DK, Wieman LA, Doyle WJ, Ross C. Infant babbling and speech. J Child Lang 1976;3:1-11.
  6. Krogman WM, Mazaheri M, Harding RL, Ishiguro K, Bariana G, Meier J, Canter H, Ross P. A longitudinal study of the craniofacial growth patterns in children with clefts as compared to normal, birth to six years. Cleft Palate J 1975;12:59-84.
  7. Schweckendiek W, Doz P. Primary veloplasty: long term results without maxillary deformity: a twentyfive year report. Cleft Palate J 1978;15:268-74.
  8. Pearl RM, Kaplan EN. Cephalometric study of facial growth in children after combined pushback and pharyngeal flap operations. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;57:480-3.
  9. Cho JH, Cho SA. The use of telescopic crowns in removable partial denture treatment for patients with severe periodontal disease: two patient case history reports. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:175-8.
  10. Breitman JB, Nakamura S, Freedman AL, Yalisove IL. Telescopic retainers: an old or new solution? A second chance to have normal dental function. J Prosthodont 2012;21:79-83.
  11. Wostmann B, Balkenhol M, Weber A, Ferger P, Rehmann P. Long-term analysis of telescopic crown retained removable partial dentures: survival and need for maintenance. J Dent 2007;35:939-45.
  12. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
  13. Weber H, Frank G. Spark erosion procedure: a method for extensive combined fixed and removable prosthodontic care. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:222-7.