The Present Status for Understanding and Recognition of STEAM Education in Pre-service Teachers Majoring in Teaching Profession of Engineering System

공학계열 교직전공 예비교사의 STEAM교육 이해도 및 인식현황

  • Hyun, Eunryung (Department of Applied Art Education, Hanyang University)
  • 현은령 (한양대학교 응용미술교육과)
  • Received : 2017.02.03
  • Accepted : 2017.03.31
  • Published : 2017.03.30

Abstract

This study examined a difference in a change of understanding and recognition on STEAM Education before and after participating in STEAM Education of university students majoring in teaching profession of engineering system who took part in 'STEAM Education of being made together with undergraduates for 2016' as part of the project for a center of supporting STEAM pre-service teachers. As a result, the pre-service teachers majoring in teaching profession of engineering system could be confirmed to have been improved the understanding and sympathy level with STEAM education as a whole following the execution of the program. Comparing it with other majoring system, the pre-service teachers majoring in teaching profession of engineering system were shown to be a little low in pre-perception or satisfaction, but were indicated later to have high intention of participation in STEAM education. This suggests that the pre-service teachers majoring in teaching profession of engineering system recognize the importance of STEAM education in the engineering education, but are feeling pressure about interpersonal communication. Accordingly, it is time that there is a need to have a system of officially providing the implementation of STEAM education and an opportunity of experience in the education for pre-service teachers aiming at the engineering education for future generation.

Keywords

STEAM;Engineering education;Pre-service Teachers

Acknowledgement

Supported by : (재)한국과학창의재단

References

  1. 김진숙(2010). 창의성 교육 국제비교 연구. 한국교육과정평가원.
  2. 백윤수(2011). 우리나라 STEAM교육의 방향. 학습자중심교과 교육연구, 11(4), 149-171.
  3. 신영준.한선관(2011). 초등학교 교사들의 융합인재교육(STEAM)에 대한 인식 연구. 초등과학교육, 30(4)m 514-523.
  4. 소경희(2011). 국가교육과정에 제시된 창의성 관련 지침의 개선 방향 탐색 : 캐나다, 영국, 호주 교육과정과의 비교를 중심으로. 교육문화연구, 8(17), 149-174.
  5. 이광우 외(2011). 창의적 인재 육성을 위한 중등학교 교육 개선연구. 한국교육과정평가원.
  6. 이춘식(2012). 미국 STEM교육의 최신 동향과 딜레마. 한국실과교육학회지, 12(25), 101-122.
  7. 양연경(2014). STEAM기반의 미술관 에듀테인먼트 스마트 콘텐츠 모델연구, 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  8. 한국과학창의재단(2014). 2014년 융합인재교육(STEAM) 프로그램 개발 분야별 워크숍 자료. 한국과학창의재단.
  9. 한국과학창의재단(2016). 2016년 융합인재교육(STEAM) 예비교사지원센터 최종보고서. 한국과학창의재단.
  10. 홍경희 외(2012). 생각에너지 숲: 21세기 창의대학. 시그마프레스.
  11. 현은령(2013). 디자인기반 '의료인문학'교육개발을 위한 의학전공 대학생의 창의적 강점 요인 분석. 디자인지식저널, 26, 249-258
  12. 현은령(2016). 미디어스토리텔링디자인 기반 STEAM프로그램의 고등학교 화학교육 적용효과. 한국디자인문화학회지, 22(3), 639-650.
  13. World Economic Forum(2016). The Future of Jobs Employers. Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Forth Industrial Revolution.
  14. Brown, J., Brown R., & Merrill, C.(2012). Science and Technology Educators' Enacted Curriculum ; Areas of Possible Collaboration for an Integrative STEM Approach in Public Schools. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71 (4), 30-34.